RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01784
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 DEC 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His separation code of “JFM” be changed to allow him to reenlist in the
service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His major depressive disorder was not pre-existing prior to his enlistment
in the Air Force.
In support of his request, the applicant provided documents extracted from
his military personnel records.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 25 March 2003, the applicant entered active duty and served in the
security forces.
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) convened on 12 April 2005 and referred his
case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) with a diagnosis of
major depressive disorder. On 9 May 2005, the IPEB found him unfit for
further military service based on a diagnosis of major depressive disorder,
resolved. The IPEB recommended that he be discharged. The applicant
agreed with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. The
Office of the Secretary of the Air Force directed that he be discharged
effective 27 June 2005. He served two years, three months, and three days
on active duty. He received a separation code of JFM – disability, existed
prior to service – PEB; and was assigned an RE code of 2Q – personnel
medically retired or discharged.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states the IPEB found the applicant
unfit for continued service based on a major depressive disorder that had
not been permanently aggravated through military service. The separation
code JFM on the DD Form 214 is the correct code for a member who was
separated due to a disability that existed prior to service.
The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he desires his separation
code changed to reenlist in the service. The preponderance of evidence
does in fact illustrate with dates and military documents that the medical
condition in question did not exist prior to service. No symptoms were
reported prior to service. The Medical Board Report, dated 2 April
2005[sic] requests continued active duty due to a resolved condition that
incurred while entitled to basic pay.
The Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The BCMR Medical Consultant
states the applicant contends he did not experience depression prior to
entering the service, but the only medical documentation available for
review clearly reports a history of depressive symptoms for several years
prior to entering military service. While the episode of depression
leading to discharge began while on active duty, the reported pre-service
history of depressive symptoms is consistent with recurrent depressive
disorder and is reinforced by the strong family history of depression. The
fact that the applicant is presently doing well is consistent with the
clinical pattern of recurrent depression with remissions and relapses and
also indicates lack of permanent service aggravation. Action and
disposition in this case are proper and equitable reflecting compliance
with Air Force directives that implement the law.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 28 September 2006, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit G). As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice warranting his separation code be
changed. After reviewing the evidence of record, it is our opinion that
the applicant’s separation from the Air Force was in accordance with Air
Force policy in effect at the time, which implements the law. His
contentions are duly noted; however, the comments provided by the Air Force
and the BCMR Medical Consultant adequately address his concerns.
Therefore, we adopt their rationale as the basis for our determination that
the applicant has not been the victim of either an error or injustice. In
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 28 November 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Judith B. Oliva, Member
Mr. Don H. Kendrick, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01784 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jun 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 27 Jun 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 Jul 06, w/atch.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 Sep 06.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Sep 06.
CATHLYNN B. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01188
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her commander recommended her discharge for failure to meet Air Force weight standards, while the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended her discharge for a medical condition that existed prior to service (depression). The applicant was discharged on 19 Nov 97 and was issued an RE code of “2Q.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02419
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibit C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02530
On 14 February 2001, Officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to military service (EPTS) and directed the applicant be discharged without disability benefits. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant was discharged for recurrent major depression that existed prior to service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01757
The IPEB reviewed his case and found the member fit and recommended, "Return to Duty." BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated he sought a second opinion by pulmonologist in December 2005 and was diagnosed with asthma after having below normal pulmonary function tests. In this respect, the Board notes...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01757
The IPEB reviewed his case and found the member fit and recommended, "Return to Duty." BCMR Medical Consultant's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and stated he sought a second opinion by pulmonologist in December 2005 and was diagnosed with asthma after having below normal pulmonary function tests. In this respect, the Board notes...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00545
After the review the IPEB determined his PTSD rendered him unfit for further service and recommended he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a compensable percentage of 50 percent. The applicant did not concur with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and requested a formal PEB (FPEB). The Medical Consultant states the preponderance of the record supports the PEB rating of 50 percent for his PTSD.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02986
The Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) was convened on 22 March 1990 and concluded her condition, Bipolar Disorder, manic, moderate, acute, with considerable impairment of social and industrial adaptability, existed prior to service without service aggravation and recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that evidence of the record indicates...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01265
Upon completion of residential treatment, he was transferred to aftercare treatment. His case was to be referred to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). According to emails in the applicant’s records, he was recommended for discharge on 8 Jul 03 for mental disorders under AFI 36-3208, para.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02390
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement and documents extracted from her military personnel record. At the time the applicant was being evaluated in the Air Force disability evaluation system, her depression and hypothyroidism were not separately unfitting and did not warrant a separate rating from the rating for fatigue. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe she has suffered from an...