RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-
02343
INDEX CODE: 131.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 JANUARY 2007
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His AF IMT 709, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), for P0504S,
be corrected to read “administrator” or “MSC” versus “physician” in
the last line.
2. His February 2004 letter to the Calendar Year (CY) 2004A Central
Selection Board (CSB) be removed.
3. He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year
2004A (CY04A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His PRF for the Lieutenant Colonel MSC Board CY04C incorrectly
indicated he was a physician. The term “physician” invalidates the
PRF. He PCS’d to Korea after the new Wing CC, the person who
signed the PRF even arrived; she obviously did not know him. He
was not able to receive a copy of the signed recommendation until
his request for records following the promotion board. His calls
to Hill AFB, and his TDY in Oct 04, resulted in him obtaining an
unsigned draft, which did not have this egregious error.
His letter written to the CY04A Lt Col MSC Board was to be expunged
prior to the convening of CY04C Lt Col MSC Board. He feels the
letters relevance was no longer applicable to the board and may
have been detrimental.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of his PRF,
the letter to the CY04A Lt Col Central Selection Board, and his
Commander’s 18 Feb 04 letter to the Board.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is serving on active duty in the grade of major. His
Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 1 Jun 91. A
review of the applicant’s last five OPRs reveals overall ratings of
meets standards. The applicant has two nonselections to the grade
of lieutenant colonel by the CY04A (1 Mar 04) (P0504A), and CY04C
(6 Dec 04) (P0504C) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Boards.
Applicant’s OPR profile is listed below.
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
1 May 00 Meets Standards
1 May 01 Meets Standards
1 May 02 Meets Standards
# 1 May 03 Meets Standards
## 1 May 04 Meets Standards
# - Top Report on file at time of the CY04A selection board.
## - Top Report on file at time of the CY04C selection board.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPP recommends denial. DPPP states the applicant did not
file an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting
Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, 20 Feb 04.
DPPP further states, the applicant failed to provide memorandums of
support from the Senior Rater and MLR President concurring with the
request and an explanation as to why it should be changed. In
addition, the member failed to provide a substitute report with the
appropriate changes.
The member’s contention that his letter to the CY04A CSB was not
expunged prior to the CY04C CSB is unfounded. AFI 36-2501,
paragraph 2.10.1.3., specifically states “Immediately after
completion of the Central Selection Board, the letter will be
removed from the individual’s selection folder and the letter, or a
copy thereof, placed in the master personnel record for historical,
legal, and appeal purposes only.” As such, his letter to the CY03A
CSB was not filed in his CY04C Officer Selection Record.
Therefore, a SSB is not warranted.
The DPPPO evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In response to the Air Force evaluation applicant states multiple
attempts to obtain a copy of the PRF in advance of the board were
unsuccessful. His rater gave him a draft copy prior to retirement
which did not have this error. He did not see the PRF until he
requested a copy of his records that met the board. He believes it
is apparent and straight forward that he is not a physician so to
change it to administrator or MSC is appropriate. He also believes
the error invalidates all positive statements presented in the
document. The MLR and promotion board event had already past when
he saw the PRF. Support for obtaining the PRF through Air Force
Element in Korea failed. He asks, with PCSs and retirement of key
individuals involved who writes a new or substitute PRF?
His contention that the letter to the CY04A CSB was not expunged is
based on his request for a copy of the records that met the board.
His request was fulfilled and included this record. The process
may be to expunge these letters but when he requested a copy of his
records that met the board it was still in there.
Applicant’s response is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
02343 in Executive Session on 2 March 2006, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer, Member
Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jul 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPP, dated 6 Dec 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02220
The applicant contends her OPR closing 31 January 2004 should have been in her OSR prepared for the CY04A Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board and the performance feedback date (8 October 2003) in section VI, of the same contested OPR is incorrect. However, it is noted this PFW was from the previous reporting period and given by a different rater who was not in the rating chain at the time of the 31 January 2004 OPR. The applicant provided no documents or letters from the rating chain...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01997 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 2 Apr 04 through 31 Aug 04 be declared void and removed from his records, and the attached reaccomplished OPR be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02209
He filed an appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports, on 20 February 2004. If the applicant’s record is not accurate, then both he and this Board have the duty to correct his record. For the reason stated and the other evidence provided, request the Board provide the relief requested.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02793
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends denial of his request to change his OPB to reflect select in the Developmental Opportunity block and noted the applicant is not a "Select." The complete DPAPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial, stating, in part, after careful review of his application, no evidence was found to show the applicant's nonselections for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03699
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03699 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 May 2008 2005 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) that was reviewed by the CY06A (13 March 2006) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) be replaced with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00758
The applicant did not file an appeal under the provisions of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports. His records were presented to a panel of three line general officers and two chaplain colonels along with 13 other officers from different Management Levels across the Air Force. It appears to the Board that the records presented before the promotion board were reviewed based on the applicant’s entire selection record.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00021
Applicant failed to provide supporting evidence to prove the report is inaccurate or was completed with any form of bias. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and that provided by the applicant, the Board majority believes that some doubt has been presented regarding a push for a group command assignment in the PRF submitted for the CY04A Colonel Central Selection Board. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends that the applicant’s PRF for the CY04A Colonel Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03654
This information was on his Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period ending 28 September 2000, which met the CY00A selection board. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states they reviewed the findings in the HQ AFPC/DPPPE advisory and have nothing further to add. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02659
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02659 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Feb 08 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) viewed by the Calendar Year 2006A (CY06A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be corrected to reflect his joint duty history and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03469
The applicant fails to recognize that the PRF is not the only record which documents performance within the Officer Selection Record (OSR) at the time of CSB promotion consideration. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denying the applicants request for direct promotion to the grade of Lt Col; however, they support Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in order for the applicant to write a letter to the CY2011A Lt Col CSB highlighting...