RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00482
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 AUG 2006
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for wounds inflicted upon
him during the 1st Gulf War (1991).
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In Feb 91, Iraqi military forces ignited nearly 700 oil wells to
use as a weapon against United States (US) and coalition forces.
The burning oil wells produced incredible quantities of smoke laden
with heavy particles including hydrogen sulfide. These fires were
not extinguished until Nov 91. He states, unlike many of the US
military, he did not have a short stay within the burning oil
fields. He lived for almost four months in that heavily
contaminated area and was exposed practically every day, every
moment of those four months.
He feels the guidance for the Purple Heart medal makes no
distinction concerning enemy employed weapons and their consequent
wounding effect on an individual, to determine justification for
the award. He was in action against an enemy of the US and was
wounded as a result of the enemy’s actions; and his exposure
continued during post-hostilities phase when he was maintaining the
cease-fire.
Since exposure to the fires, he has had a chronic cough. When he
mentioned it during his retirement physical, the doctor directed
him to have his lungs tested, and the test verified his condition.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement,
a copy of travel voucher, dated 28 Feb 91, and a copy of a
Pulmonary Function Report.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 Aug 63 and was
honorably released and transferred to the Air Force Reserve on
28 Aug 68 and remained until his discharge on 26 Aug 69. He
enlisted in the Air National Guard on 28 Dec 70 and was discharged
on 16 Aug 71. Applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant on
17 Aug 71.
As an enlisted member, he served in Vietnam, during the Vietnam War
as a forward ground based air controller; was awarded the Purple
Heart Medal for wounds incurred as a direct result of an act of an
enemy on 10 Mar 68. Subsequently, he was commissioned and served
as a navigator and in staff and command positions. He was
progressively promoted to the rank of colonel with an effective
date and promotion service date of 1 Jun 97.
Applicant served during DESERT SHIELD/STORM from 26 Feb 91 –
28 Jun 91 and was awarded a Bronze Star and a Meritorious Service
Medal for meritorious achievement as a director of operations.
A complete list of the applicant’s awards and decorations for the
period 12 Mar 79 to 31 Jan 05 are cited in the DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, dated
31 Jan 05. (See DD Form 214, dated 31 Jan 05 at Exhibit B)
He was honorably retired from active duty on 1 Feb 05 and was
credited with 35 years, 1 month, and 7 days of active service for
retirement. This included 7 years, 3 months, and 4 days of foreign
service.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial,
stating, in part, to be awarded the PH, a member must provide
documentation to support they were wounded as a direct result of
enemy action. In addition, it is necessary that the wound required
or received medical treatment by medical personnel.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
He attached a report called “Results of a Workshop on Medical
Effects of Crude Oil Exposures related to Operation Desert Storm,”
Feb 91;
The report contains critically important concerns and
warnings. He states the findings of the report were never made
available to the only USAF deployed unit in Kuwait. Additionally,
CENTAF sent its first sergeant on a fact finding visit resulting in
no protective equipment being sent, aside from a box of paper throw-
away painters mask, which were of no value. No medical personnel
visited with the unit nor was any constructive advice given on
protecting personnel from the contaminants.
The evaluation points out that wounds must be received as a direct
result of enemy action. He says, “This is correct, and I do not
take exception to the definition. However, what is implied is a
very narrow concept of the phrase, direct result.” This comes from
his extensive experience in combat operations and with over five
years within DOD as a senior expert on terrorist.
He believes that during the 1st Gulf War, he and other military
members experienced the non-conventional use of a weapon system,
i.e., the pre-meditated ignition of oil well crude oil by enemy
forces and the subsequent production of a dangerous and massively
enveloping cloud of toxic and non-toxic particles.
In conclusion, he was subjected to a non-conventional weapon
(chemical laden, particle plumes) generated against US forces by
the Iraqi military during combat operations. He was wounded by the
chemicals and suffer the lasting effects.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant retired for
maximum service on 31 Jan 05 after 35 years, 1 month, and 7 days of
active duty service. Applicant requests award of the Purple Heart
Medal for lung injury due to inhalation of smoke from the Kuwait
oil field fires during Desert Storm.
During the time applicant was exposed to smoke from the Kuwait oil
field fires and blowing sand due to the Shammal winds (from March
to September) that blow the fine sand dusts from the desert.
A review of the applicant’s service medical records show the
applicant was a non-smoker with normal lung function and infrequent
care for respiratory complaints attributed to viral infection (a
February 7, 1989, entry for upper respiratory tract infection
indicates “wheeze” on examination). There were no entries showing
care of respiratory complaints while deployed to Kuwait in 1991.
At the time of his annual medical examination on 24 Apr 92, the
physician recorded that the applicant had no medical complaints,
and on examination his lungs were clear to auscultation. His
annual medical examination on 29 Mar 93 reported his overall health
as “very good” and specifically denied symptoms of chronic or
frequent colds, ear nose or throat trouble, asthma, shortness of
breath, pain or pressure in chest, or chronic cough. The
examination of the lungs was recorded as normal.
There are no other pertinent entries present in the copy of the
service medical record until his Dec 04 retirement examination
except for a series of wound clinic entries from 2000. At the time
of his retirement medical examination on 8 Dec 04, the examining
physician recorded that the applicant complained of;
Chronic cough, especially with exposure to dust/humidity; occasional
brief “loss of breath”. In Kuwait (Mar 91 – Jun 91, then periodically
through Nov), exposure to extensive oil fires. Six (symptoms) seemed
to worsen during the past summer – remains active yet impaired by
decreased respiratory status.
The physician noted a normal chest x-ray and pulmonary function
tests that showed “evidence of obstructive disease, not improved
with bronchodilators.” The pulmonary function tests interpreted
the results as “possible early obstructive pulmonary impairment.
Values reported as 90% of predicted and represent a decline in
function in the applicant compared to values obtained prior to his
deployment to Kuwait.
Military Members are eligible for award of the Purple Heart Medal
for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action and for
which medical treatment was or would have been required. A wound
is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside
force or agent sustained as the result of a hostile act of the
enemy. A physical lesion is not required, however the wound for
which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical
officer and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries
received in action must have been made a matter of official record.
Established guidelines for when smoke inhalation injury is of
sufficient severity to earn consideration for the PH; includes
respiratory compromise of sufficient severity to require
hospitalization in an intensive care unit; evidence of hypoxemia
(low blood oxygen levels indicating lung injury) within 96 hours of
exposure by arterial blood gas tests or pulse oximetry; chest
radiographic abnormalities consistent with smoke inhalation
appearing within 96 hours of exposure; and new onset airway
obstruction by spirometry (PFTs) within 6 weeks of the exposure.
Indirect injuries do not qualify for the award and would include
disease (malnutrition, dysentery, pneumonia, etc), exposure
(climatic elements to include frostbite), injury incurred as a
secondary effect of enemy action (i.e., bailing out of a disabled
aircraft or mid-air collision of allied aircraft though over enemy
territory), injuries received while seeking shelter from mortar or
rocket attacks, aircraft bombings, grenades, and injuries incurred
while serving as an aircrew member or in passenger status because
of the aircraft’s evasive measures against hostile fire. The
injuries must have incurred from the exploding device or shrapnel
from the device itself. To preserve the integrity of the award,
primary documentary evidence is usually necessary.
With regard to smoke inhalation injury and award of the PH, the
same basic criteria apply as to other injuries. Two basic criteria
are required, that an injury occurred and that it was the direct
result of hostile enemy action. While an injury due to an enemy
projectile is quite straight forward with regard to entitlement to
a Purple Heart, the same cannot be uniformly said about
inhalational injury. The criteria require clear evidence of lung
injury. This is designed to avoid awarding the PH for a cough due
to irritation of lung tissue without injury that a member may or
may not seek medical attention for. The established criteria for
the PH define an injury as one that requires or would have required
medical attention. An irritant cough does not require medical
attention, although such attention may or may not be sought. The
applicant’s cough and pulmonary function test abnormalities
thirteen years after he was in Kuwait do not qualify him for the
Purple Heart. Action and disposition in this case are proper and
equitable reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that
implement the law.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit F.
___________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant’s response to the additional Air Force evaluation is at
Exhibit H.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case. The applicant is requesting award of the Purple Heart Medal
for lung injury due to inhalation of smoke from the Kuwait oil
field fires during Desert Storm. At the time of his retirement
medical examination, applicant’s medical records reflect a chronic
cough with mildly abnormal pulmonary function test, which was over
13 years after his deployment to Kuwait. We found no evidence the
applicant was treated for respiratory complaints while deployed to
Kuwait in 1991, or of a lung injury related to inhalation of Kuwait
oil fire smoke that required medical attention or that was the
direct result of hostile enemy action. Military members are
entitled to award of the Purple Heart Medal for wounds received as
a direct result of enemy action and for which medical treatment was
or would have been required. The applicant’s case has undergone an
exhaustive review by the BCMR Medical Consultant and there is
nothing in the evidence provided by the applicant that would
overcome his assessment of the case. We therefore agree with the
opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has
failed to sustain his burden of having suffered either an error or
injustice. Hence, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-00482 in Executive Session on 14 February 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Feb 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 5 Apr 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Apr 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 26 Apr 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 23 Nov 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBMCR, dated 6 Dec 05.
Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant, dated 3 Jan 06.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01291
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His condition is the result of exposure to jet fuel, several glues and cleaning chemical agents required in making repairs performing his duties as an Aircraft Fuels Systems Mechanic. The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded that he was a smoker during...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001715
The applicant states: * he was injured on 24 July 2009; he was present and physically located within 15 meters of the impact zone of several enemy mortar rounds * he was involved in an enemy indirect mortar attack that set ablaze a lithium battery warehouse * the incident caused him internal injuries and concussion injuries as a result of an enemy-generated explosion * HRC stated he did not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart because he was responding to an enemy attack rather...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085089C070212
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The Board reviewed the medical records submitted by the applicant showing that he sustained an injury to his left arm and was treated for that injury. The Board considered the applicant's contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for emphysema he sustained as the result of oil well fires in Kuwait.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01534
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Restrictive Lung Disease Condition . The CI was diagnosed with restrictive lung disease of unclear etiology and the pulmonary specialist also noted possible chronic obstructive lung disease associated with smoking.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00100
Chronic Cough Condition . When carefully considering the whole record IAW VASRD §4.2 (Interpretation of examination reports) in order to develop a consistent picture of the CI’s chronic cough condition health condition the Board agreed the evidence reflects a consistent improvement in the post bronchodilator. In the matter of the chronic cough condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 30%, coded 6699-6602 IAW VASRD §4.97.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00595
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00595 INDEX CODE: 111.00, 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His reactive airways disease is a direct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008596
t. VA rating decision, dated 3 December 2009, which shows he was awarded service-connected disability compensation for a reactive airway disease/asthma, rated at 30% service-connected, increased to 100% effective 11 August 2009. e. Referral to the Army PDES requires a determination that a Soldier does not meet medical retention standards before an individual can be separated from the military because of an injury or medical condition There is no evidence the applicant had: * a permanent...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02350
The CI was prescribed a combined steroid (Advair) and BD inhaler twice daily and follow-up PFT in three months was recommended.A follow up PC visit 29 March 2004 noted that the CI had no symptoms and was not using the BD inhaler “at all.”At the MEB exam 29 March 2004, the CI reported asthma, denied any SOB or chest tightness, but still had occasional coughing spells.The medications list included Advair twice daily “started today.” The MEB physical exam noted a normal lung exam. However, a...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01574
The PEB did not address the second MEB condition of “ other acute and subacute respiratory conditions due to fumes and vapors.” The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The MEB NARSUM dated 1 September 2004, recorded at the time of the MEB; the CI used only the “rescue” (quick acting to terminate SOB or prevent SOB) inhaler on as needed basis. The Board noted the NARSUM documented only intermittent use of a rescue bronchodilator inhaler.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00491
The CI developed symptoms of shortness of breath associated with an acute upper respiratory illness (URI) in March 2004. The PEB and the VA used the same coding, but arrived at different ratings for the condition. In the matter of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease condition, the Board unanimously recommends a permanent service disability rating of 10%, coded 6604 IAW VASRD§4.97.