Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001715
Original file (20140001715.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 March 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20140001715 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Awards and Decorations Board decision denying him award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was injured on 24 July 2009; he was present and physically located within 15 meters of the impact zone of several enemy mortar rounds
* he was involved in an enemy indirect mortar attack that set ablaze a lithium battery warehouse 
* the incident caused him internal injuries and concussion injuries as a result of an enemy-generated explosion
* HRC stated he did not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart because he was responding to an enemy attack rather than being involved in the attack
* the impact of the mortar rounds caused the concussion and the smoke and fumes from the battery caused internal injuries to his nose, throat, and airway and required three surgical procedures
* the fact that he provided assistance does not change the fact that he was exposed to two physical events as a result of direct enemy action

3.  The applicant provides:

* Medical statement, dated 15 January 2014
* DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 8 January 2014
* Officer Record Brief, dated 16 January 2014
* Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 24 July 2009
* Orders A-09-926119 (deployment)
* Standard Form 600, dated 23 October 2009
* DD Form 2796 (Post-Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA))
* Fire Incident Report, dated 28 July 2009
* Memorandum for Record, dated 14 February 2011
* Witness statement, dated 14 January 2011
* HRC denial letter, dated 10 December 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was appointed as Regular Army commissioned officer and entered active duty on 5 June 1997.  He completed the Infantry Basic Officer Leader Course. 

2.  He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he was promoted to major on 1 February 2007.  At the time of the incident, he was assigned to the Multi-National Sustainment Training Command, Multi-National Force Iraq. 

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.   Standard Form 600, dated 24 July 2009, which shows the applicant was exposed to smoke and acid fumes from burning batteries.  He inhaled smoke from burning plastic and waste.  He was also exposed to loud noise, an explosion, and heat.  He was seen for headache, dizziness, irritated eyes, sore throat, coughing, congestion, and runny nose.  He was given “CHI” for facial, skin, and watery eyes, and Tylenol for the headaches.  

	b.  A Fire Incident Report, dated 28 July 2009, that essentially describes a loud explosion from a mortar round that occurred on Friday 24 July 2009 at a lithium battery warehouse in Baghdad, Iraq.  Some personnel working inside the warehouse were injured.  

	c.  DD Form 2796 (PDHA), dated 23 October 2009, in which he states he served in theater from 19 June to 29 September 2009.  He indicated he had breathing difficulty and claimed he was injured during this deployment.  He attributed his injury to a blast in a battery warehouse fire accident.


	d.  Standard Form 600, dated 23 October 2009, which he completed in conjunction with the PDHA and he again indicated he was injured by a blast or explosion of a lithium battery warehouse.  He rated his health as much worse now than when he deployed and indicated his emotional problems are now very difficult.  He also stated he was a patient at the Warrior Transition Unit and is scheduled for Rhinoplasty on 2 November 2009. 

4.  On 29 August 2013, the Commander, U.S. Army Element, Joint Task Force Civil Support, Fort Eustis, VA, submitted a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) to the Commander, HRC, recommending the applicant be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in action caused directly by the enemy.  He stated:

The applicant was involved in an enemy indirect mortar attack that set ablaze a lithium battery warehouse causing internal injuries and damage to his respiratory airways due to exposure to toxic fumes while in Iraq. 

5.  With this request, which was favorably endorsed by the Commanding General, Joint Task Force Civil Support, Fort Eustis, he submitted:

	a.  Memorandum for Record, dated 14 February 2011, from Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) MEA, an aviation officer, who states he was forward deployed in Iraq from 20 June 2009 to 14 June 2010.  On the evening of 24 July 2009, after an enemy indirect mortar attack at Victory Base Camp, he went to see if there was any assistance he could provide.  He witnessed the applicant and others within 20 to 30 meters from the burning warehouse receiving medical assistance from the medics on site.  He later learned of the contents of the warehouse which burned for several days with thick black smoke.  He also later learned that the applicant departed theater due to medical issues caused by the exposure during the mortar attack. 

	b.  Statement from MAJ TEB, dated 14 February 2011, who states he worked as a quality assurance technician for a joint program in Kuwait.  He states that on 24 July 2009 he personally witnessed the applicant physically present and within 20 meters of the location that came under enemy indirect mortar attack on base.  He was departing after a meeting that day when he witnessed several mortar rounds impacting the warehouse and setting ablaze the entire facility.  He remembers the applicant because he immediately arrived at the site after a mortar round impacted within a few meters from his location.  He saw him exiting his vehicle and running toward the building and his location was within 20 meters from the explosion.  He was then actively involved in assisting some of the personnel who were injured in the attack.  He also had the opportunity to talk to the applicant at that time.  
	c.  Statement from Mr. GLF, dated 24 November 2011, who states he also worked at the joint program in Kuwait at the time.  He adds that he personally witnessed the applicant on 24 July 2009 physically present at the location when that location came under enemy indirect mortar attack.  He saw the applicant dismount and run from his vehicle to within 20 meters of his position.  At the time of the explosion, he (the author) was a few meters away from the applicant and about 15 meters from the door to the warehouse.  There were three rounds that impacted the area.  As soon as the applicant arrived, he ran toward the building when another round impacted within 20 meters of his location.  

6.  On 10 December 2012, by memorandum, the Chief, Awards and Decorations Branch, HRC, disapproved the request for award of the Purple Heart.  The memorandum stated that the narrative and sworn statements provided show that the injuries are not directly caused by enemy action.  The mortar round impacted the warehouse that the applicant was not inhabiting and although he went above and beyond the call of duty to rescue those injured in the attack, this injury does not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. 

7.  He provides additional documents:

	a.  A medical statement, dated 15 January 2004, that shows he was seen at the Internal Medicine Clinic at Fort Eustis for primary care.  He was exposed to a blast while serving in Iraq in 2009.  Since that time, he has been experiencing intermittent headaches, dizziness, visual disturbances, anxiety, and asthma (attributed to fume exposure).  His medical condition is consistent with a concussion and traumatic brain injury. 

	b.  DA Form 3349, dated 8 January 2014, for asthma.  The profile states he was medically evacuated from Iraq in 2009 after exposure to toxic fumes and subsequently developed asthma.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

	a.  A wound is defined as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force or agent sustained under one or more of the conditions applicable to the Purple Heart.  A physical lesion is not required; however, the wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by medical personnel and records of medical treatment for wounds or injuries received in action must have been made a matter of official record.
	b.  Examples of enemy-related injuries which clearly justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

* injury caused by enemy bullet, shrapnel, or other projectile created by enemy action
* injury caused by enemy-placed mine or trap
* injury caused by enemy-released chemical, biological, or nuclear agent
* injury caused by vehicle or aircraft accident resulting from enemy fire
* concussion injuries caused as a result of enemy-generated explosions

	c.  Examples of injuries or wounds which clearly do not justify award of the Purple Heart are as follows:

* frostbite or trench foot injuries
* heat stroke
* food poisoning not caused by enemy agents
* chemical, biological, or nuclear agents not released by the enemy
* battle fatigue
* disease not directly caused by enemy agents
* accidents, to include explosive, aircraft, vehicular, and other accidental wounding not related to or caused by enemy action
* self-inflicted wounds, except when in the heat of battle and not involving gross negligence
* post-traumatic stress disorders
* jump injuries not caused by enemy action

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The Purple Heart differs from all other decorations in that an individual is not "recommended" for the decoration; rather, he or she is entitled to it upon meeting specific criteria.  When contemplating award of the Purple Heart, the key issue that commanders must take into consideration is the degree to which the enemy caused the injury.  The fact that the proposed recipient was participating in direct or indirect combat operations is a necessary prerequisite, but is not the sole justification for the award.

2.  The criteria for an award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify the injury/wound was sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  In this case, the applicant's injury resulted from inhaling fumes and exposure to a loud noise, not from the mortar round itself.  The fact that he exited the vehicle, approached the warehouse, and assisted the wounded/injured, is noted; however, the agent that caused the injury was the battery fumes; the mortar round did not cause the injury.  As such, his injury does not meet the criteria or the intent for award of the Purple Heart.

4.  Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for those wounds/injuries, and his treatment was made a matter of record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001715



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20140001715



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000566

    Original file (20120000566.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Award of the Combat Action Badge is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the: * Purple Heart for wounds received on 13 July 2004 * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006762

    Original file (20110006762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides three pages from his service medical records showing he sought medical treatment on 20 June 2005 for pain in his left elbow after a mortar attack. He provides a DA Form 2823, dated 20 June 2005, showing Chief Warrant Officer 2 C------ W----- confirmed the events described by the applicant in his statement. The ADB stated, in effect, the available documentation did not show he received an injury that required treatment by medical personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005457

    Original file (20150005457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was denied the Purple Heart due to insufficient medical evidence to support a diagnosis and/or treatment of an injury caused by enemy action. The applicant provides the following documents: * 2003 Mobilization orders * 2004 Permanent Orders (PO) for award of the Combat Action Badge * 2004 News release * 2005 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * 2007 DA Form 7349 (Initial Medical Review-Annual Medical Certificate) * 2009 Treatment at the Podiatry Clinic *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003607

    Original file (20090003607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1129 for award of the Purple Heart, the Secretary of the Army will treat a member of the Armed Forces described in ( a ), below, in the same manner as a member who is killed or wounded in action as the result of an act of an enemy of the United States. There are no orders awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004723

    Original file (20130004723.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides: * Congressional correspondence * Denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), request for award of the Purple Heart * Incomplete DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Standard Forms 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Incomplete DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation - Line of Duty and Misconduct Statement) * DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021323

    Original file (20120021323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. An email, dated 23 January 2012, from a Verizon email user who states he was the unit medic at the time in question and that he treated the applicant for a small concussion at Vinh Kim after a mortar round knocked him off his feet in February 1969. c. A statement, dated 12 January 2012, from a radio telephone operator who served in the same unit at the time. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016507

    Original file (20110016507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not show award of the Purple Heart. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record: a. Notwithstanding his sincerity as well as that of his buddies, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023324

    Original file (20110023324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show it. Nothing in five typical documents show he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493

    Original file (20130012493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001556

    Original file (20150001556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated in his previous application: a. His records contain: a. He described these injuries as "superficial" and stated he believed the injuries may have been cause by shrapnel from the explosion.