RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02653
INDEX CODE: 135.00, 136.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEB 2007
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His retirement date of 1 Feb 05 be changed to 6 Feb 05, and that he
be credited and paid for his split-annual tour on 1 - 4 Feb 05, and
his Unit Training Assembly (UTA) tour on 5 – 6 Feb 05.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He performed the tours and was required to pay out of pocket
expenses for lodging for those days due to his High Year Tenure
(HYT) date ending his orders. Those days would have normally been
reimbursed on his final voucher.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted email correspondence
from his commander and a lodging receipt.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Based on available records, applicant served in the Regular Air
Force from 19 Apr 72 – 12 Aug 80. He was enlisted in the Air Force
Reserve on 13 Aug 80 and had honorable satisfactory service until
his retirement effective 1 Feb 05.
On 12 Aug 04, applicant requested to be transferred to the Retired
Reserve requesting a retirement date of 1 Feb 05, his HYT date.
Applicant’s orders were published on 19 Jan 05.
He was credited with 32 years, 9 months, and 13 days of
satisfactory federal service, and was retired in the grade of
senior master sergeant.
Air Force Reserve members are not allowed to stay past their HYT
date.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP reviewed this application and recommended denial.
They provided the following analysis of the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s case:
a. A review of the applicant’s record indicates he is
eligible for Reserve retired pay under the provisions of Title 10,
USC, Section 12731, effective on his 60th birthday, 10 Aug 2012.
He completed an AF Form 131, Application for Transfer to the
Retired Reserve on 12 Aug 04, requesting a 1 Feb 05 retirement, his
HYT date. The applicant’s retirement order was published on 19 Jan
05 and mailed to him on 27 Jan 05.
b. On 3 Feb 05, the HQ ARPC Retirement Division received a
call from the applicant’s military personnel flight (MPF) asking if
the retirement date could be changed. HQ ARPC/DPPR informed the
MPF the date could not be changed without the approval of the
Secretary of the Air Force (SAF). The applicant was retired due to
maximum service for HYT. Furthermore, the applicant’s Expiration
Term of Service (ETS) was 1 Feb 05.
c. On 4 Feb 05, another call was received from the MPF. The
MPF asked to change the retirement date to 6 Feb 05, because it was
UTA weekend and the applicant wanted to participate. Again they
were informed the retirement date could not be changed without SAF
approval. Applicant did not request to change the retirement date
prior to the effective date as required by the AFI, and he did not
have a waiver to stay past his HYT date.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 23 Sep 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant
requests that his effective date of retirement be changed from
1 Feb 05 to 6 Feb 05, and that he be credited and paid for duty
performed after his effective date of retirement. We note that on
12 Aug 04, he completed an AF Form 131, Application for Transfer to
the Retired Reserve, requesting a 1 Feb 05 retirement, his High
Year Tenure (HYT) date. His retirement order was published on
19 Jan 05 and mailed to him on 27 Jan 05, with a 1 Feb 05
retirement effective date. IAW AFI 36-3209, Separation and
Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve
Members, enlisted members retired at HYT submit an application for
transfer to the Retired Reserve 60 to 90 days before their
retirement effective date. After the effective date of retirement,
withdrawal, cancellation, or change of the effective date cannot be
accomplished without SAF or designated approval authority.
No further participation is authorized after the effective date of
retirement. After careful review of the evidence submitted in
support of the applicant’s appeal, we found no evidence that he
requested a change to his retirement date prior to the 1 Feb 05
effective date, or that he had an approved waiver to stay beyond
his high year of tenure date. Furthermore, given the applicant’s
number of years of service and his position as the unit’s First
Sergeant, we believe he had a responsibility to question being
scheduled for duty subsequent to his effective date of retirement.
We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Reserve Personnel Center and adopt its rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Based on the foregoing, and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-02653 in Executive Session on 10 November 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Cheryl V. Jacobson, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Aug 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 19 Sep 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Sep 05.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03516
In support of the appeal, applicant provided a personal statement, dated 30 September 2006, copies of a Chronology prepared by the 482 FW/IG, dated 5 August 2006, a HYTD Notification Memorandum from the 482 MSG/DPMSA, dated 9 January 2004, an Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4), dated 2 October 2004, a Report on Individual Person (RIP), dated 20 April 2005, an undated memorandum acknowledging HYT extension, an e-mail trail from May- July 2005 advising 482 MSG/CES/CC of HYT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01075
AFI 36-2606 states that the appeal authority for individuals like the applicant with more than 20 years of service would be his group commander. Based on HQ AFPC/DPPRRP’s advisory (Exhibit E), the group commander’s Military Personnel Flight (MPF) contacted the HQ AFPC retirements section to advise that the group commander was going to complete the AF Form 418. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB advises the applicant was...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPAD, states that their office received two letters in behalf of the applicant recommending approval of his request for a HYT waiver. At the time of receipt of these two letters the applicant was erroneously given an adjusted HYT date of 1 August 2000. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00344
However, the Board decided to grant the applicant a measure of relief based on clemency and promoted him to the grade of senior airman with a DOR of 1 Oct 03, which allowed him an opportunity to test for promotion to the grade of SSgt and allow him to retire in that grade. They further note that HYT extensions are designed to address specific problems and issues, not to allow a member the opportunity to test for the next higher grade, which they believe the applicant’s request is based on. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00365
He states that at the time he was considered for promotion to MSgt, he had more than 12 months left until retirement. Counsel opines that based on the stipulations in AFI 36-2502 and AFRC 36-2102, the Air Force could have, and should have, granted the applicant the promotion to master sergeant (MSgt). The waiver was denied because the applicant would have only been able to perform duty as a MSgt for 10 months before reaching his mandatory retirement at High Year of Tenure Date of 20 Mar 07.
In support of his request, applicant provided a letter from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service-Denver Center concerning a debt in the amount of $476.38 for drills performed on January 10 and 11, 1998, after his separation. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPAR, reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating there is no provision of law that permits members to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03913
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was required to extend his current enlistment for 18 months to meet the service obligation for an in-place overseas tour, he requested to extend to his high year of tenure date (HYTD) of 8 April 2007. The applicant’s HYT as a Master Sergeant, at the time of his extension, was 8 April 2007 (24 years). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00223
On 10 Sep 03, the Board did not restore his SSgt grade but instead promoted him to senior airman effective 9 Apr 03 and waived the HYT restriction so he could be eligible for promotion consideration by the 04E5 cycle. His present reenlistment (RE) code of 4D renders him ineligible to reenlist because of HYT restrictions, i.e., he has not yet been promoted to SSgt. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPRR notes the applicant is not reenlistment eligible,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02653
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02653 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX XX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 MAR 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the CY06A (13 Mar 06) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03333
The applicant was called to ADT on 19 Apr 62, and was released from ADT on 16 Oct 62. In a 14 May 64 letter, the 90ATS reported the applicant failed to complete his ADT, serving only 32 days. On 16 Feb 65, the applicant was relieved from the Reserves and discharged under honorable conditions (general), effective 16 Feb 65.