RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03516
INDEX CODE: 135.03
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 January 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated from the Retired Reserve, awaiting pay at age 60, to the
United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR) Unit Program, with promotion to the
grade of Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His forced retirement at his High Year of Tenure Date (HYTD) prevents him
from retiring in the grade of SMSgt.
His request for continuation waiver beyond his HYTD was not handled in
accordance with procedures established by the regulation governing the High
Year of Tenure (HYT) Program.
He is available to fulfill his commitment to the USAFR based on his
original expiration term of service (ETS) date of 1 October 2008. His goal
is to retire as a SMSgt, and he feels that he was unfairly treated by the
mistake of others. His career has been truncated and he would like the
AFBCMR to revoke his early retirement and allow him to fulfill his goal.
He firmly believes he can still contribute in the fight against the war on
terror, his country needs him, and he is ready to continue serving his
country.
In support of the appeal, applicant provided a personal statement, dated 30
September 2006, copies of a Chronology prepared by the 482 FW/IG, dated 5
August 2006, a HYTD Notification Memorandum from the 482 MSG/DPMSA, dated 9
January 2004, an Enlistment/Reenlistment Document (DD Form 4), dated
2 October 2004, a Report on Individual Person (RIP), dated 20 April 2005,
an undated memorandum acknowledging HYT extension, an e-mail trail from May-
July 2005 advising 482 MSG/CES/CC of HYT extension, a Reserve Airmen
Promotion Eligibility Roster, dated 31 March 2006, a Reserve Service
Commitment Contract, dated 2 April 2006, an MPF Reserve Commitment Contract
template, Reserve Promotion Order Number ROP-124, which promoted him to the
grade of SMSgt, dated 1 May 2006, and an AFRC/A1BB memorandum revoking his
promotion to the grade of SMSgt, dated 28 July 2006.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The USAFR HYT Program is designed to improve grade ratios, ensure sustained
promotion opportunity for lower graded enlisted personnel, and increase
readiness by providing a force fit for the rigors of war. It limits
participation in the Selected Reserve and participating Individual Ready
Reserve (IRR) programs to a total of 33 years creditable service for
military pay (Pay Date) for all enlisted members of the USAFR unless they
are selected for retention beyond their HYTD. A member’s HYTD corresponds
to the first day of the month following either member’s HYTD or age 60,
whichever occurs first. The USAFR HYT Program allows extensions of a
member’s HYTD for a total of three years, not to exceed age 60, for rare
circumstances when a member’s service is deemed essential to unit
readiness. A member’s ETS will not exceed their HYTD.
Applicant’s Date-of-Birth is 23 January 1949 (age 58), and his Pay Date was
17 July 1972. In accordance with the USAFR HYT Policy, he was given a HYTD
of 1 August 2005. His HYTD was extended to 1 August 2006 in May 2005, but
was not further extended because his commander determined that his
continued service was not essential to unit readiness. He was promoted to
the grade of SMSgt (E-8) effective 1 May 2006.
In July 2006, his servicing MPF discovered the errors and requested
revocation of his promotion to SMSgt, which was approved by HQ AFRC on 28
July 2006. Although his promotion to SMSgt was revoked, he was allowed to
retain the pay he received as a SMSgt. He was transferred to the Retired
Reserve, awaiting pay at age 60, effective on his HYTD of 1 August 2006.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1B recommends denial. Central to applicant’s contentions is a
violation by his Military Personnel Flight (MPF) of the AF Instruction
governing USAFR reenlistment and retention. The AFI states that a member’s
ETS will not exceed their HYTD. His servicing MPF failed to check his HYTD
prior to allowing him to reenlist on 2 October 2004 for a period of four
years. Thus, his ETS became 1 October 2008, even though his HYTD was 1
August 2006.
Also central to applicant’s contentions is that during the period March-
April 2006, his servicing MPF again failed to check his HYTD when
processing his promotion to SMSgt, which became effective 1 May 2006. The
promotion should have not occurred since the AFI governing the USAFR
Commitment Program requires a member promoted to the grade of SMSgt to have
at least two years retainability from the effective date of the promotion.
Since his HYTD was 1 August 2006, he did not have sufficient retainability
to fulfill the two year service commitment for promotion to SMSgt.
They acknowledge that his servicing MPF clearly failed to comply with
program requirements that would have precluded his reenlistment beyond his
HYTD and promotion to SMSgt. However, these errors do not warrant his
return to the USAFR Unit Program, nor do they warrant his promotion to
SMSgt. They also point out that the errors did not result in the
applicant’s losing any benefits or entitlements. Rather, he benefited from
the errors by receiving pay as a SMSgt for the May, June, and July 2006
Unit Training Assemblies, as well receiving pay as a SMSgt for his 3-18
June 2006 Annual Tour.
If the AFBCMR grants the relief sought, they recommend his HYTD be extended
from 1 August 2006 to a future date not to exceed 1 August 2008, he be
returned to the USAFR Unit Program, and that he be promoted to the grade of
SMSgt, with a date of rank that will allow him to fulfill his two year
Reserve Service Commitment by his HYTD, or the two year service commitment
be waived.
The AFRC/A1B evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant responded to the AFRC/A1B advisory on 15 February 2007. He
reiterated that his servicing MPF failed to comply with the HYT Program
requirements. He asked the Customer Service Section about his HYTD of 1
August 2006 when he went to get his new ID card due to his promotion to
SMSgt, and was told “Don’t worry, you are good until 1 October 2008.” He
informed his commander and vice-commander of this and continued to
participate until his August 2006 UTA, when he was informed by the Senior
Air Reserve Technician that he could no longer participate and had to
retire from the USAFR.
A complete copy of applicant’s response is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Although his Military Personnel Flight
clearly failed to comply with program requirements that would have
precluded his reenlistment beyond his HYTD and his erroneous promotion to
SMSgt, these errors did not result in the loss of any benefits or
entitlements, and do not warrant granting the relief sought in this
application. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in
judging the merits of the case, and noted that his squadron commander
initially recommended that his HYTD be extended three years, from 1 August
2005 to 1 August 2008. However, HQ AFRC/CV subsequently approved only a
one year extension to 1 August 2006, and we found no evidence that his
commander intended to request any further extensions of his HYTD. Should
the applicant provide documentation that his commander intended to request
further extensions to his HYTD, the Board would reconsider his request.
However, in the absence of such evidence, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt
it’s rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-03516
in Executive Session on 8 March 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jul 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1B, dated 16 Jan 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Feb 07, w/atch
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jan 07.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00365
He states that at the time he was considered for promotion to MSgt, he had more than 12 months left until retirement. Counsel opines that based on the stipulations in AFI 36-2502 and AFRC 36-2102, the Air Force could have, and should have, granted the applicant the promotion to master sergeant (MSgt). The waiver was denied because the applicant would have only been able to perform duty as a MSgt for 10 months before reaching his mandatory retirement at High Year of Tenure Date of 20 Mar 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03042
The applicants HYTD of 1 September 2010 (pay date of 30 August 1977 plus 33 years, first day of the following month) is in compliance with the USAFR HYT Program. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01181
She was not promoted however to SMSgt. In this respect, a commander is not under any obligation to promote a member who meets the basic requirements, such as TIG, until that commander feels that the member is ready for promotion and proceeds with a recommendation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03913
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was required to extend his current enlistment for 18 months to meet the service obligation for an in-place overseas tour, he requested to extend to his high year of tenure date (HYTD) of 8 April 2007. The applicant’s HYT as a Master Sergeant, at the time of his extension, was 8 April 2007 (24 years). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01576
Neither of these periods of time constitutes a break in service, based on applicable Air Force and DoD directives. A1K notes, IAW AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, para 4.6 and DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoDFMR) 7000.14-R, Military Pay Policy and Procedures Active Duty and Reserve Pay, an assignment to the Inactive Reserve or Retired Reserve is not considered a break in military service because the member is assigned to a military status and as such, is subject to...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01050
When the CMSgt retired in Sep 04, the commander placed another SMSgt in the position since his medical appeal was not complete and it did not appear that he would have the two years retainablity because of his age. 1) The MPF should have placed his name on the promotion roster in either May or Jul; 2) He should have been placed on T-3 status similar to active duty members when diagnosed with cancer, which would have allowed him to continue duty in a drilling status, and be promoted to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00705 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 SEPTEMBER 2008 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to the grade of chief master sergeant (CMSgt). On 1 September 2006, he was promoted to CMSgt. A1B states in accordance with AFI 36-2502, paragraph 4.9,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01556
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The 349th MSS/DPMS recommends the applicant be authorized to reenlist into the Air Force Reserve retroactively to his gain date in order to qualify for the Reserve Bonus Incentive program or...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01362
In July 1994, she enlisted in the Air Force Reserve (USAFR) and was assigned to the Security Police Squadron at Westover Air Reserve Base as an SSgt. While she kept her supervisor and squadron informed of her status, she was lax in that she did not follow through by submitting the proper paperwork that would have put her in an inactive status until her Expiration Term of Service (ETS) in July 2000. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03981
DPM states in accordance with AFI 36-2612, a member's HYT date will be the first day of the month following the date equal to the member's pay date plus 33 years, not to exceed age 60. This date, minus the six years of prior service correctly established a pay date of 21 Feb 70. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...