Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01925
Original file (BC-2005-01925.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01925
            INDEX CODE:  128.10
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  18 December 2006

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be released from recoupment of his debt in the amount of $5,635.69.


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Defense Finance and  Accounting  Service  (DFAS)  and  Luke  AFB,  AZ,
personnel attempted to correct his pay after July 2002.   He  has  not
received all the money DFAS shows he owes.  When he was on active duty
from July 2002 through February 2004, he tried to resolve a portion of
his debt.

In support of his appeal, applicant submits  a  copy  of  his  Special
Order recalling him to active duty,  correspondence  relating  to  his
financial situation and copies of his Leave and Earning Statements for
the period beginning July 2001 and  ending  March  2004.   Applicant’s
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Documents provided by the applicant indicate he  retired  effective  1
October 2001 and was recalled  to  active  duty  from  retired  status
effective 18 July 2004 for a period  of  24  months.   On  29 February
2004, the applicant was  released  from  active  duty  for  reason  of
completion of required service and reverted back  to  retired  status.
He was credited with 1 year, 7 months and 11 days  of  active  service
and 23 years, 6 months and 21 days of prior active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS-POCT/DE recommends a partial grant in the  amount  of  $2,117.93.
DFAS-POCT/DE states that the first portion of  the  applicant’s  debt,
$73.89, is due to an overpayment of his pay and  allowances  upon  his
original  separation  date  of  30   September   2001.    DFAS-POCT/DE
recommends approval of a waiver for $73.89.  The second portion of his
debt is for the over deduction of taxes  for  the  period  October  to
December 2001.  His pay account was not closed out and taxes continued
to be deducted.  Since this is more than three years old,  adjustments
can not be made; therefore, DFAS-POCT-DE  recommends  approval  for  a
waiver for $1,595.40.  The third portion  of  his  debt  was  for  the
overpayment of $448.64 for pay and allowances for the period  18  July
2002 through 29 February 2004.  Since the  applicant  would  not  have
known that he had  been  overpaid  during  this  period,  DFAS-POCT/DE
recommends approval of a waiver for $448.64.  The remaining amount  of
$3,517.76 is the result of over deduction of taxes from 1  January  to
17 July 2002 advises DFAS-POCT/DE.  The FICA and M/C for January to 17
July 2002 was refunded to him in May 2003.   The  DFAS-POCT/DE  is  at
Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant believes that the main problem with his case  is  that  DFAS
has an outdated computer  system  which  doesn’t  interface  with  the
personnel computer system.  The applicant asks why DFAS didn’t ask the
IRS for the refund of money paid  on  his  behalf.   He  believes  the
countless hours spent to resolve his pay record problems show that  no
one knows if his pay record is correct.  He respectfully requests  the
Board waiver the remaining $3517.76 and have  DFAS  return  the  money
he’s been paying them in the time he’s tried  to  resolve  this  case.
The applicant’s letter is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2. The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  While the applicant was properly
charged with a debt as a result of the overpayment of  Federal  Income
Tax Withholdings (FITW), we believe that a remission of a  portion  of
the debt is appropriate.  In an  advisory  opinion  prepared  for  our
review, it has been stated that due to the mishandling of his  account
in the form of overpayments of FITW and  payments  in  excess  of  his
entitlements, the  applicant’s  waiver  request  should  be  partially
approved in the amount of $2,117.93.   As  to  the  remaining  sum  of
$3,517.76, the applicant should have been able to recoup  these  funds
over-withheld by the Federal government for taxes  from  the  Internal
Revenue Service.  Waiving any part of that sum  would  result  in  the
applicant’s unjust enrichment.
_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that, on 2  June  2005,
he applied for a remission  of  his  indebtedness,  incurred  for  the
overpayment of Federal Income Tax  Withholdings  (FITW);  and  that  a
remission of the debt in the amount of $2,117.93 was approved  by  the
Secretary of the Air Force pursuant to Section 9837, Title 10,  United
States Code.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board Docket Number 05-01925 in Executive
Session on 14 December 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair

                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr, Member
                 Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Jun 05, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 20 Jul 05, w/atch.
      Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 05.
      Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Aug 05.




      THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
      Chair


AFBCMR BC-2005-01925




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that on 2 June 2005,
he applied for a remission of his indebtedness, incurred for the
overpayment of Federal Income Tax Withholdings (FITW); and that a remission
of the debt in the amount of $2,117.93 was approved by the Secretary of the
Air Force pursuant to Section 9837, Title 10, United States Code.





JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

     Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9500926

    Original file (9500926.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on input from the Retraining Section at AFMPC, the applicant received approved CAREERS retraining into AFSC 115x0 (which was authorized a Zone A, Multiple One-Half SRB) on 4 February 1993, prior to his reenlistment in AFSC 361x1. DPMAPE recommended denial of the applicant's request to have the recouped SRB reinstated. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000881

    Original file (0000881.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 00-00881 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKM be changed to a code that would not require the recoupment of her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02102

    Original file (BC 2013 02102.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) corrected his records in 2009 to allow him to enroll in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP). On 2 Dec 2008, the applicant submitted an application to the AFBCMR requesting his records be corrected to allow his enrollment in the Enlisted College Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP). DPSIT states that the Air Force policy on ECLRP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009197C070206

    Original file (20050009197C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Robert L. Duecaster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DOHA denied waiver of the applicant's overpayment resulting from DFAS not properly deducting his federal taxes while paying the same to the IRS. ), provides authority for waiving claims for erroneous payments of pay and certain allowances made to or on behalf of service members or former service members of the Uniformed Services, if collection of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00580A

    Original file (BC-2001-00580A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete review is at Exhibit K. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL HQ USAF/JAA EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reiterates that the applicant’s original debt of $50,669.90 was reduced to $25,669.90 and, to the extent that his reconsideration request was for the repayment of this validly established debt owed to the US, it should be denied. DFAS summarizes the applicant’s indebtedness and adjustments thereto as follows: $50,669.90 Original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02431

    Original file (BC-2004-02431.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he was placed on the retired list effective 1 June 2001 and received retired pay through November 2001. Although he was selected for continuation on active duty, the Retirements Processing Section at AFPC was not notified until after the 1 June 2001 retirement had consummated in MilPDS. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While AFPC contends he was an active duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03705

    Original file (BC-2011-03705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DFAS-IN states the applicant was discharged from the service due to a General Court-Martial Order, dated 18 July 2007. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The DFAS letter has errors and incorrect information. Based on the evidence of record and in an attempt to guide the applicant to the proper office for resolution, we determined the applicant is correct in that,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021583

    Original file (20120021583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Upon his discharge from the Army, DFAS audited his pay records between May 2002 and September 2007, although he was discharged in 2004. It appears he contested/disputed this debt with DFAS.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04043

    Original file (BC-2002-04043.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He inquired again about the debt and this time he was told it was invalid and that the accounting and finance representative would notify the Defense Accounting and Finance Service (DFAS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 6 January 2003, he applied for a waiver of his indebtedness incurred as a result of overpayment...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02194

    Original file (BC-2005-02194.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of her separation she had been disqualified from Air Traffic Control duties and had been continued on active duty awaiting waivers and Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) processing. With regard to the presence of medical conditions that were potentially disqualifying for controller duties, the Medical Consultant states the fact that she decided to voluntarily separate under pregnancy provisions rather than remain on active duty and complete the planned evaluations and...