Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01776
Original file (BC-2005-01776.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                        DOCKET  NUMBER:   BC-2005-
01776
                                             INDEX  CODE:   107.00,
110.00

                                             COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  NO



MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  5 DECEMBER 2006


___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and  that
it be added to his DD Form 214, Report of  Separation  from  Active
Duty.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The AFEM was not listed on his DD Form 214.

In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214.


The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit
A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air  Force  from
29 May 71 to 28 May 75.  His DD Form 214 reflects he served 1 year,
5 months, and 20 days of  Foreign  Service.   He  was  awarded  the
National Defense Service Medal  and  the  Air  Force  Good  Conduct
Medal.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request  be  denied.   The
applicant served in Taiwan during the period of  November  1973  to
July 1974.  No other foreign service is listed  or  documents  were
submitted to support an area of eligibility for the AFEM.  The AFEM
is awarded to members who, after 1 July 1958, have participated  in
United States military operations  and  encountered  foreign  armed
opposition, or were in danger of hostile action  by  foreign  Armed
Forces.

Applicant’s performance reports reflect his foreign service was  to
Tainan AB, Taiwan.  Applicant is not eligible for award of the AFEM
for that tour of duty.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 5 Aug 05, a copy of the Air Force evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01776  in  Executive  Session  on  13  September  2005,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
      Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 May 05, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 22 Jul 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 05.




                                   JOHN B. HENNESSEY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02116

    Original file (BC-2007-02116.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Times indicated that personnel assigned during that time-frame were awarded the AFEM. DPPPR states that the AFEM was awarded to members of the service who, after 1 July 1958, have participated in United States military operations and encountered foreign armed opposition, or were in danger of hostile action by foreign armed forces. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01774

    Original file (BC-2005-01774.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no documentation the applicant was awarded the PH or BSM, with “V” device. The personal sacrifice the applicant endured for his country is noted and our decision in no way lessens his service; however, absent a showing that his injuries where the direct result of enemy action, we find no basis upon which to recommend...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02212

    Original file (BC-2005-02212.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry is not a recognizable award given by the Air Force. The applicant is probably requesting the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross (RVNGC) medal, which was awarded sparingly during the early years of the Vietnam War, to the United States Army by the Republic of Vietnam, and later awarded by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01775

    Original file (BC-2005-01775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01775 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour (AFOSR-L), American Defense Service Medal (ADSM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00919

    Original file (BC-2006-00919.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00919 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 September 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour (AFOR-ST), Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02139

    Original file (BC-2005-02139.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02139 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 JANUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Military Education (PME) Graduation Ribbon. In support of his request, the applicant provided his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01376

    Original file (BC-2005-01376.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the AFCM. Should the applicant secure documentation showing he was recommended for the Air Force Commendation Medal or an official order issued approving the medal, the Board would reconsider his application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01238

    Original file (BC-2005-01238.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be awarded the AM because he was assigned to the flight crew of the commander of the 84th Depot Repair Squadron, 15th Air Force, who was awarded the AM. Further, under the 1996 NDAA service members may request consideration of awards not previously eligible because of time limitations, provided the written recommendations be made by someone other than the member himself, in the member’s chain...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00274

    Original file (BC-2003-00274.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s DD Form 214 he was awarded the following medal: Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGMC). The applicant’s records show that he was informed in 1990 that he was not eligible for the National Defense Service Medal; in 1996 he requested issuance of the AFEM and the National Personnel Records Center had it sent to him in error, but again informed him he was not eligible for the National Defense Service Medal; and in 1998 he was informed he was not eligible for a unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05711

    Original file (BC-2012-05711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05711 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...