RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01197
INDEX CODE: 110.01
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 Oct 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty,
be changed to reflect she was retired on 24 Feb 05, rather than on
18 May 02.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was removed from the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL)
and retired on 24 Feb 05. She wants her DD Form 214 to reflect her
new status of permanently retired.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 Sep 99 and served
as an air traffic control apprentice.
On 2 Jul 01, the applicant was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD) after she sustained a traumatic altercation (assault)
by civilian police during an alleged alcohol-related incident (later
cleared from her civilian record in court). This event was followed
by the sudden illness and subsequent death of her father during the
Thanksgiving holiday. She experienced increasing depressive and PTSD
symptoms and required treatment with psychotherapy and medication.
PTSD is incompatible with air traffic controller duties per AFI 48-
123.
On 22 Feb 02, an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) recommended
the applicant be placed on the TDRL with a disability rating of 30%
for PTSD with major depression. The applicant disagreed with the
recommendation; however, on 25 Mar 02, the Secretary of the Air Force
Personnel Council (SAF/PC) directed the applicant be placed on the
TDRL at 30%.
On 17 May 02, the applicant was placed on the TDRL in the grade of
senior airman, after 2 years, 8 months, and 10 days of active duty,
with a disability rating of 30%. Her placement on the TDRL required
her to undergo periodic physical evaluations.
An 18 Aug 03 Narrative Summary revealed she continued to experience
ongoing neurovegetative signs and symptoms of depression and
breakthrough PTSD symptoms with frequent flashbacks of her father’s
death. She lived with and took care of her disabled mother.
Treatment of her depressive symptoms had only moderate success and her
risk of posing a danger to herself or others in active duty status was
significant. Recommendation was ongoing psychotherapy as well as
medication management.
On 15 Oct 03, an IPEB recommended continuance on the TDRL. On 18 Nov
04, a Narrative Summary noted the applicant’s continued depression and
flashbacks, as well as the death of three paternal aunts in the past
year. On 17 Dec 04, an IPEB determined the applicant’s condition was
essentially unchanged and recommended she be placed on the Permanent
Disability Retirement List (PDRL) at 30% for major depressive disorder
associated with PTSD. The applicant concurred.
Special Order No. ACD-00291, dated 4 Feb 05, directed the applicant be
permanently retired in the grade of senior airman for disability at
30%, effective 24 Feb 05.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPD advises that the applicant’s DD Form 214 cannot be
amended or changed to reflect she was medically retired on a later
date since she was permanently retired after her DD Form 214 was
issued. When a member is removed from the TDRL, a new DD Form 214 is
not issued. Rather, the member receives a Special Order indicating
her final status. That order becomes a permanent part of her military
personnel file and can be attached to her DD Form 214 reflecting her
final disposition. Denial is recommended.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not
persuaded her DD Form 214 should be changed to show she retired on
24 Feb 05, rather than on 18 May 02. The applicant’s contentions are
duly noted; however, we do not find these assertions, in and by
themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force. When a member is removed from the TDRL, a new DD
Form 214 is not issued; DD Form 214s are used to reflect active
service only, not time on the TDRL or inactive Reserve duty. Her
Special Order permanently retiring her for medical disability is a
permanent part of her military personnel file and reflects her final
disposition. We therefore adopt the rationale expressed as the basis
for our decision that the applicant has not sustained her burden of
having suffered either an error or an injustice. In view of the above
and absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, we conclude this
appeal should be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 14 September 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-01197 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPD, dated 21 Jul 05, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 05.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-03585A
_________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD states, in part, that the findings and recommendation of the FPEB along with the applicant’s rebuttal for a permanent retirement were forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) for adjudication and SAFPC recommended that she be removed from the TDRL and permanently retired with a 60% rating. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00029 INDEX CODE: 110.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JUL 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to show she served a full 20 years of active service; or, she be reinstated back into the military to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02301
An MEB was convened on 1 Feb 00 and referred her case to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) with a diagnosis of Axis I: somatization disorder, PTSD, chronic and partial remission, depressive disorder not otherwise specified; and Axis II: borderline and paranoid personality traits. Her PTSD represents an existing prior to service condition that in combination with her maladaptive personality traits is significantly responsible for her primary unfitting diagnosis of somatization...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00330
After more than three years on TDRL and a third hospitalization (December 2006), the PEB adjudicated a permanent disability rating for the PTSD condition of 10% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). PTSD Condition . The Board therefore has no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting conditions for separation rating.
On 19 May 97, an MEB found the applicant not world-wide qualified and recommended she be referred to an Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). He diagnosed her as having a personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and recommended administrative separation. On 9 Nov 98, the IPEB found her fit with an adjustment disorder which existed prior to service (EPTS) at the USAFA and recommended she be returned to duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03829
Her problems were incompatible with military service and her past medical history included a variety of pelvic and gynecological conditions that were estimated to be present for three years and would likely be the source of her pelvic pain. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant notes that, although the MEB indicated the applicant’s conditions had not EPTS, the IPEB concluded otherwise. The Consultant gives a...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00217
(including Bipolar Disorder) The Board unanimously agrees with the PEB, that the Bipolar disorder was not separately unfitting but was related to the PTSD condition. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02668
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Physical Disability Board of Review Special Review Panel (PDBR SRP) recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. On 8 Jun 11, during a TDRL evaluation, an Informal PEB (IPEB) found the applicants MH condition was unfitting but stabilized and...