RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01082
INDEX NUMBER: 131.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 Sep 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared on him and viewed by the
CY04J Colonel Central Selection Board be corrected to reflect his
service as a base level Staff Judge Advocate effective July 2002.
He be granted promotion consideration to the grade of colonel by
Special Selection Board for the CY04J Colonel Central Selection Board
with the corrected OSB.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A prejudicial error on the face of the initial document the promotion
board reviewed (OSB) may have been enough to discount his record as
not “worthy of promotion.” His OSB makes it appear he had been
serving in the same assignment since May 97. He would think that a
promotion board would not look favorably on a lieutenant colonel
working at the same base for the last seven or eight years. It wasn’t
until he received post-board counseling from AFPC/JA that someone
mentioned that his OSB did not contain his service as a base level
staff judge advocate beginning in Jul 02.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his last
two Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) and an Officer SURF.
The complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is serving on active duty in the grade of lieutenant
colonel. His Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
14 Jan 88. The applicant was considered and not selected for
promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY04J Colonel Central
Selection Board.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/JAX confirmed that the applicant has been serving as the Staff
Judge Advocate at the base in question since May 02. They indicate
that to answer the question of whether the promotion board was aware
of the applicant’s assignment, they would need to review the
information he received prior to the promotion board and also the OSB
prepared on him.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial of the applicant’s request. They note
that the applicant arrived at the duty assignment in question over two
years before the central selection board convened, which provided him
ample time to confirm whether his duty information was correct in the
Military Personnel Data System. The applicant provides no
documentation to show he took any action to ensure the accuracy of his
record prior to the central selection board. As such, they stand by
the policy in AFI 36-2501, paragraph 6.3.2.2, which states, “Do not
have an SSB if, by exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should
have discovered the error or omission and could have taken corrective
action before the originally scheduled board convened.”
Additionally, they note that although not reflected on his OSB, the
applicant’s Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) and top two Officer
Performance Reports (OPRs) reflected the assignment in question.
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
20 May 05 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response
has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-
01082 in Executive Session on 6 July 2005, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia A. Robey, Member
Mr. Patrick C. Daugherty, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Mar 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, HQ USAF/JAX, dated 21 Apr 05.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 12 May 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 05.
B.J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00114
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00114 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared on him and viewed by the CY04B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be corrected to accurately reflect his duty history. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00144-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00114 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jul 07 __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the CY04B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03688 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 JUN 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY04B (12 July 2004) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board, with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01932
She be given SSB consideration by the CY04J Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board with inclusion of a letter she wrote to the original board; her Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect her five-month deployment in 2003 to the CENTCOM AOR and removal of AF Form 77 closing 26 May 2000, from her Officer Selection Record (OSR) and the corresponding OPRs for the same rating period from all of the benchmark records for the purpose of SSB consideration. She wrote a letter to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2005-00161
In the commander’s statement of support, he attests to the applicant’s efforts to review and make appropriate changes to his records prior to the selection board and that the incomplete changes occurred after the correction attempts. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-2005-00161 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00941
A review of the applicant’s personnel record confirms both the Air Force and the Joint Staff’s systems of record were updated to reflect appropriate joint duty credit at the time the promotion board convened. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant asserts that nowhere in the referenced CJCSI does it say that joint duty history will not be reflected on an...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02041
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02041 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include a copy of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) Third Oak Leaf Cluster (3OLC) he was awarded for the period 13 May 96 to 15 Jul 00 and his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01692 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 November 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY02B (12 November 2002) Lieutenant Colonel Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02471
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02471 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty title on his officer performance report (OPR) closing 1 APR 05 and his Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) (Second Oak Leaf Cluster (2OLC) citation, with a change to the...
However, if the decision is to grant the specific relief sought, the OPR closing out in October 1992 should reflect “Assistant Chief, Civil Law/Military Justice;” the OPR closing out in July 1993 should reflect “Assistant Chief, Military Justice;” and the OPR closing out in July 1994 should reflect “Chief, Civil Law.” The related duty titles in the personnel database would have to be changed as well. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...