RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03330
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His RE code should be changed because he has an honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no evidence in support of his appeal.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26 March 1998.
Following his completion of training, he received three Enlisted
Performance Reports (EPRs) closing 15 October 1999, 15 October 2000
and 15 October 2001, in which, the Promotion Recommendations were 2, 1
and 3. The first two reports were referral reports. The applicant
declined to rebut the 1999 report but did submit rebuttal comments to
the 2000 EPR.
On 8 August 2001, the applicant’s supervisor nonrecommended him for
reenlistment because of the applicant’s unsatisfactory duty
performance and “misconduct on/off duty.” The commander concurred and
nonselected the applicant for reenlistment on 8 August 2001. The
applicant was notified of his nonselection for reenlistment and
elected not to appeal this action.
On 16 March 2002, the applicant was honorably released from active
duty in the grade of A1C (E-3) under the provisions of AFI 36-3208
(Completion of Required Active Service) and transferred to the Air
Force Reserve. He was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
of 2X (First term airman considered but not selected under SRP). He
served a total of 3 years, 11 months and 21 days of total active
service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant has not satisfactorily indicated
the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not
in compliance with Air Force policy. Based on the review of his case
file, his RE code 2X is correct. Therefore, they recommend denial of
applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 January 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. The applicant believes his RE
code is incorrect because he was honorably discharged. However, the
code he received had its basis in his nonselection for reenlistment.
The reasons the applicant’s supervisor nonrecommended and his
commander nonselected him for reenlistment are clearly shown in the
record. The applicant has provided no evidence that the reasons cited
for his nonselection are erroneous or that his commander abused his
discretionary authority. We therefore agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis
for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket No. 02-
03330 in Executive Session on 5 February 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Thomas J. Topolski, Jr., Member
Mr. Steven A. Shaw, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 24 Dec 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 3 Jan 03.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02924 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so that he may reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 January...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02535
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02535 INDEX CODE: 112.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2C (involuntary separation with honorable discharge) to enable him to enter the Air Force Reserve. On 27 June 1994, the Squadron Section Commander signed a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01193 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” be changed. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02872
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02872 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes, if necessary _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to “1R.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes the RE code he received is unjust because his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-03532 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Mississippi Air National Guard. Applicant's EPR profile reflects the following: PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION 17 Dec 95 2 2 Aug 96...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03256
Therefore, we have no basis to conclude that the corresponding RE code that was assigned at the time of his separation does not accurately reflect the circumstances of his separation. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00837 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00568
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00568 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Separation Code of “JBK,” discharged after completion of required service, be changed. Her “2X” Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code, “First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for...