RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03009
INDEX CODE: 129.01, 135.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be awarded active duty points, back pay and allowances, and
Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP) from 1 January 1998 to 22 May 2004,
plus the difference in back pay between captain and major (Maj/04)
from 1 October 1997 to 31 December 1997.
2. His record be changed to show he accepted a Regular Air Force
(RegAF) appointment from the calendar year 1990 (CY90) Regular Air
Force Appointment Board and that he held a Regular commission when he
was considered for promotion to major by the CY95A and CY96A Major
Selection Boards.
3. He meet a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to major
reflecting his status as a Regular officer instead of his Indefinite
Reserve Status (IRS). Should he be selected for promotion to major by
a Special Selection Board, his date of rank (DOR) to major and to
lieutenant colonel (Lt Col/05) be adjusted accordingly and he receive
back pay and allowances for those grades as well as Aviation
Continuation Pay (ACP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Applicant was selected for promotion to the grade of major while
serving with the 169th Air Control Party Flight (ACPF), Illinois Air
National Guard (ILANG). On 19 April 1997, he left the ILANG for a
position with the AF Reserve (AFR). He assumed the new assignment
would be as a major as he and his gaining commander had talked about
him being selected for promotion to major by the FY97 ANG Major’s
Board. He states the authorized grade at the new AFR assignment
turned out to be a captain (Capt/03). His commander informed him he
could either remain a captain in the AGR position or resign the AGR
position and pin on major as a Traditional reservist. He contends he
was never informed why he was not in a majors position or what his
options as an AGR in this situation might have been. However, he
understood the situation to be that if he did not resign his AGR
position and accept the promotion to major, then the March 1997
selection Board to major would count as a “pass over.”
In May 2004, as he was reviewing his records for the FY 04 Lt Col
Promotion Board, he was sent a copy of an amendment that had been made
to his original AGR order. The amendment, dated 6 October 1997,
changed his authorized grade from captain to major, presumably in an
attempt to allow him to pin on major and remain in AGR status. He was
never aware of the amendment, and in fact, resigned his AGR position
to accept his promotion to major on 31 December 1997. He contends he
should have been promoted to major and kept his original fulltime AGR
position back in October 1997. He contends he would have stayed on
for the duration of his AGR tour (1 October 1997 to 1 October 2001),
as he intended to stay for 20 years of active federal service, and had
he been able to stay in his AGR tour he would have reached 20 years of
active duty on 22 May 2004.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided personal
statements, and copies of numerous pertinent Special Orders, the
organizational history of the 43rd Flying Training Squadron, pertinent
email trails, Leave and Earnings statements, and pertinent promotion
paperwork.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the ILANG on 12 September 1980 where he served
as an Avionics Instrument Systems Technician for 3 years and 11
months. He applied for an Air Force commission, was accepted and
completed Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT).
On 20 August 1990, he was selected for a Regular Appointment by the
Regular Air Force Appointment Board. His Military Personnel Flight
(MPF) was sent notification of the appointment offer on 30 October
1990 and instructed to forward it to his commander and eventually to
the applicant. He was given a suspense of 28 December 1990 to
respond. He did not respond by the suspense date, the offer was
terminated, and he was placed in an administratively declined status.
He was considered but not selected for promotion to the grade of major
by the CY95A and CY96A Central Major Selection Boards.
On 11 June 1996, he was released from active duty and transferred to
the Reserve of the Air Force effective 29 September 1996. On 30
September 1996, he joined the ILANG as a Traditional Guardsman.
On 5 December 1996, he applied for a position with the AF Reserve
(AFR) and on 28 February 1997, he was selected and his transfer to the
AFR was approved.
On 7 March 1997, he was selected for promotion to the grade of major
by the FY97 ANG Major Selection Board. His effective date and date of
rank (DOR) was 1 October 1997.
On 10 April 1997, he was ordered to active duty (AGR) with the Air
Force Reserve with a reporting date of 20 April 1997. On 14 April
1997, he was relieved from the ILANG and gained by the 951st RSPTS,
AFR effective 19 April 1997.
On 1 October 1997, he was released from the 951st RSPTS and assigned
to the 43rd FTF. On 6 October 1997, the order transferring him to the
43rd FTF was amended changing his position number and rank from
090325/Captain to 0903234/Major.
On 21 October 1997, he submitted a letter officially resigning his AGR
position for a Traditional Reserve (TR) position. On 22 October 1997,
he was officially reassigned from the AGR program to a TR program.
On 29 December 1997, an overgrade waiver was submitted on his behalf
requesting an overgrade from captain to major for a period of two
years – 1 January 1998 to 1 January 2000.
On 14 January 1998, an order was published releasing him from his AGR
position. The orders Remarks column reads: Member will convert to TR
position with authorized grade of captain. Overgrade waiver approved
on 4 January 1998 for two years. Also on 14 January 1998, a promotion
order was published promoting him to the grade of major, effective and
with a DOR of 1 October 1997.
On 23 August 2004, he was notified of his selection for promotion to
the grade of lieutenant colonel by the AFR.
He has served over 26 years of combined Air Force and Reserve
component service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/REAMO addresses the applicant’s request for active duty
points, back pay, and ACP from 1 January 1998 to 22 May 2004 as well
as the difference in captain and major pay between the dates 1 October
1997 and 31 December 1997. REAMO recommends partial relief in that
the applicant is entitled to back pay for the rank of major from 1
October 1997 to 31 December 1997.
Regarding his request to receive back pay of ACP from 1 January 1998
to 22 May 2004, REAMO notes the AFR did not implement the ACP program
until 2000. Therefore he would not have been able to apply for ACP
prior to 2000. Further, his request has merit only if he had not
resigned his AGR position with an authorized grade of captain on 21
October 1997 in favor of a Traditional reservist position with an
authorized grade of major. If he had remained an AGR however, it is
conceivable he could have requested an extension of his tour making
him eligible for an ACP contract after 2000, assuming his extension
request would have been granted. Regarding his request for back
points and active duty pay from 1 January 1998 to 22 May 2004, REAMO
notes again that had he retained his AGR status, and assuming
necessary tour extensions, he would now be eligible for an active duty
retirement.
REAMO states the applicant’s claim that because of ineffective
administrative support he was misinformed and had to give up his AGR
tour in order to accept a promotion to major is without merit.
According to Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2504, Officer Promotion,
Continuation and Selective Early Removal in The Reserve of The Air
Force, even if the applicant had thought he was in a captain’s billet,
he could still have held on to the promotion until he had secured a
major’s billet. He then would have been eligible to pin-on
immediately with a DOR of 1 October 1997. REAMO notes that even
though they (USAF/REAMO) did not exist at the time, they checked with
the AGR managers of the time (AF/REP and HQ AFRC) and found that AGRs
were not forced out of their tours for an inability to pin on rank.
The member was eligible to remain in the AGR program at the rank of
the authorized billet until the member secured a billet (through
transfer or upgrade of position) at the rank for which they were
promoted. The member would then be immediately eligible to pin on the
new rank. REAMO contends there is no record in the file as to why his
AGR tour was curtailed. Applicant states it was curtailed because he
was unable to pin-on major and was therefore “forced out of the tour.”
REAMO states the applicant resigned from his AGR tour voluntarily.
REAMO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPPOO addresses the applicant’s eligibility for a RegAF
appointment. DPPPOO states the applicant met and was selected for a
RegAF Appointment by the CY90 Regular Air Force Appointment Board that
convened on 20 August 1990. The RegAF Board results were released on
30 October 1990 and selectees were given until 28 December 1990 to
accept the RegAF offer. DPPPOO states applicant was not aware of his
selection for a RegAF appointment and that had he known, he would have
taken the steps necessary to accept the offer. DPPPOO notes as the
applicant’s squadron was deployed in support of Desert Shield/Desert
Storm the possibility exists his servicing Military Personnel Flight
(MPF) may have inadvertently thought the applicant was also deployed
and that the personnel team at his deployed location was handling
notifications for the deployed officers. Since access to the
selection lists were prohibitively limited in 1990, DPPPOO believes
the possibility exists the applicant would have found it difficult to
locate any information about his selection or nonselection for a RegAF
appointment. Therefore, DPPPOO recommends his records be changed to
show he accepted the RegAF appointment. Additionally, he be granted
Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for the CY95A Major
Selection Board and if not selected he be considered for promotion to
major by the CY96A Major Selection Board. Further, his Officer
Selection Brief be corrected to show his DOS as Indefinite rather
than, 31 December 2003.
DPPPOO’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant disagrees with the HQ USAF/REAMO advisory and provides a
copy of an AF Form 1288, the document that transferred him from the
169th ACPF to 10 AF/CCS, clearly stating the position number and
authorized grade of the position to be major. He contends this is
proof positive that the “Capt” on Special Order (SO) A-094, is
incorrect and that SO AA-116 showing the authorized grade of major is
correct. He contends REAMO’s contention that curtailment statements
were not found (removing him from his AGR tour), is without merit as
he has found the documents in question confirming his statement that
he was under the impression he was in an overgrade situation. His
commander’s statement that his career goals, “…changed from one of
full time service to that of a part time reservist, and the pursuit of
a civilian,” is misrepresentative. At the time, he had no job
prospects and certainly would not have terminated his civilian
position and associated major billet to uproot his family and move
them to Columbus, MS, unless it was for what he would consider a good
career move. He states that, in direct contradiction to the AGR
Career Management Program, he was not given the opportunity to realize
a career and potential retirement in the AGR program and he was not
properly afforded career counseling he now knows he needed to make
more informed decisions. He states he intends to continue serving
with the 43rd FTS no matter what the Board concludes and argues
against the advisory’s opinion that his application is speculative
when referring to tour extensions and rank issues.
Applicant’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice in regards to the applicant’s request
for a Regular Air Force appointment, consideration for promotion to
the grade of major by SSBs, and the difference in pay from October
1997 to December 1997. The CY90 Regular Air Force Appointment Board
met on 20 August 1990 and published its results on 30 October 1990.
Applicant had been selected and was given until 28 December 1990 to
accept the Regular Air Force Appointment offer. The Air Force office
of primary responsibility recommends approval of his request for a
Regular Air Force Appointment and we agree. Further, as he was not
selected for promotion to the grade of major by the CY95A and CY96A
Major Selection Boards with an accurate record, we believe he should
be granted SSB consideration for promotion to the grade of major by
the selection boards in question. As a matter of interest, whether or
not he is allowed to continue on active duty depends on the results of
the SSBs. If he is selected for promotion, he will be provided an
opportunity to return to active duty. In regards to his request for
back pay for the period he was serving as a major and being paid as a
captain, we recommend he receive the difference in pay between the two
grades for the period 1 October 1997 to 31 December 1997. Therefore,
we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice regarding the remaining issues for
which he has requested relief. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice in that he voluntarily curtailed his AGR tour and is not
entitled to back pay and allowances, ACP, and active duty points.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the remaining relief sought.
5. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. On 5 February 1990, he was tendered and accepted a
Regular Air Force Appointment and action be initiated to obtain Senate
confirmation.
b. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report (OPR),
rendered for the period 25 July 1990 through 26 August 1991, be
amended in block 2, SSN, by deleting "FV" and in Section VI, by
deleting the words "Augment to the Regular force and".
c. The OPR rendered for the period 27 August 1991 through
25 May 1992, be amended in block 2, SSN, by deleting "FV", in Section
VI, by deleting the words “Augment now” and in Section VII, by
deleting the sentence “Augment into the Regular Air Force”.
d. The OPR rendered for the period 26 May 1992 through
25 May 1993, be amended in Section VII, by deleting the words “…and
augment into the Regular Air Force”.
e. The OPR rendered for the period 26 May 1993 through
11 February 1994, be amended in Section VI, by deleting the words
“Augmentation is a must for this clearly superior officer”, and in
Section VII, deleting the words “-Augment now!”.
f. The OPR rendered for the period 12 February 1994
through 22 July 1994, be amended in Section VI, by deleting the words
“Augment and…” and in Section VII, by deleting the sentence “Augment--
then ISS” and inserting the sentence "Send to ISS.".
It is further directed that he be considered for promotion to the
grade of major by Special Selection Boards for the Calendar Year 1995A
and 1996A Central Major Selection Board, to include the above
corrections to his record.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 4 May 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
Mr. Albert C. Ellett, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Jul 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAF/REAMO, dated 25 Oct 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, APPLICANT, dated 11 Nov 04, w/atchs.
JOHN B. HENNESSEY
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2004-03009
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 5 February 1990, he accepted a Regular Air Force
Appointment and upon Senate confirmation he be tendered a Regular Air
Force Appointment.
b. The Field Grade Officer Performance Report (OPR),
rendered for the period 25 July 1990 through 26 August 1991, be
amended in block 2, SSN, by deleting "FV" and in Section VI, by
deleting the words "Augment to the Regular force and".
c. The OPR rendered for the period 27 August 1991 through
25 May 1992, be amended in block 2, SSN, by deleting "FV", in Section
VI, by deleting the words “Augment now” and in Section VII, by
deleting the sentence “Augment into the Regular Air Force”.
d. The OPR rendered for the period 26 May 1992 through
25 May 1993, be amended in Section VII, by deleting the words “…and
augment into the Regular Air Force”.
e. The OPR rendered for the period 26 May 1993 through
11 February 1994, be amended in Section VI, by deleting the words
“Augmentation is a must for this clearly superior officer”, and in
Section VII, deleting the words “-Augment now!”.
f. The OPR rendered for the period 12 February 1994
through 22 July 1994, be amended in Section VI, by deleting the words
“Augment and…” and in Section VII, by deleting the sentence “Augment--
then ISS” and inserting the sentence "Send to ISS.".
It is further directed that he be considered for promotion to
the grade of major by Special Selection Boards for the Calendar Year
1995A and 1996A Central Major Selection Board, to include the above
corrections to his record.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04795
Her record be corrected to reflect that she was selected for the position of Director, Reserve Active Guard/Reserve (AGR) Management Office (REAMO) effective Jan 09. As to a violation of Title 10 USC 1034b, the applicant appears to have the opinion that she was the only qualified applicant and would have been selected but for reprisal by the Deputy AF/RE substantiated in the SAF/IGS ROI. AF/JAA states that the applicant was not the only AGR who was the top candidate for the Director, REAMO...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02023
AFRC asserts that “he had to request voluntary AGR curtailment which would release him from his contract of current active duty service (AGR Tour) with the Air Force Reserve, and he had to be conditionally released from the AFR for each of the acronyms stated there. Of significance to the Board is the fact that although he claims his AGR Tour was wrongfully terminated, he completed and submitted the AGR Tour Curtailment Worksheet on 26 August 2006, with a stated reason for his request being...
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Appeals & SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed this application and indicated that promotion nonselection is not an issue. In ~yinstance, the applicant failed to provide a letter of support from the rater of the contested report. But the time to do that is before the report becomes a matter of record.
Additionally, DPPP states that the applicant’s request for correction was for Section X, Senior Rater, to include the rank and branch of service of the senior rater and in Section IV, line 9 from, “first tour USAF Chaplain” to “second active duty tour.” DPPP recommends denial for an SSB based on the OPR not being available for the CY01A CSB. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the...
In the applicant’s case, the IPEB and FPEB during their evaluations both determined his condition as “May be Permanent.” The permanence determination of the applicant’s medical condition was based on the preponderance of medical evidence provided at the time of his medical evaluation. However, in our opinion, it appears that with proper rest and therapy, the applicant’s medical problem may have resolved itself within a reasonable period of time, he would have been able to return to his...
AF | BCMR | CY1998 | BC-1998-01961
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 24 Aug 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be given the requested relief. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPOC, dated 31 Jul 98.
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 24 Aug 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be given the requested relief. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPOC, dated 31 Jul 98.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02938
If his RegAF promotion were reinstated, he would be able to stay on active duty until age 62, which would give him enough time to meet his IPZ lieutenant colonel promotion board. The applicant was not offered a RegAF appointment when he was selected for promotion to major because his 55th birthday occurs before he completes 20 years of federal commissioned service. The law clearly outlines the age requirements an officer must meet to be granted a RegAF appointment.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03031
JA states that based on the facts presented in the NGB opinions, JA finds their responses to be legally sufficient and concurs with the recommendations to deny the applicant's requests for corrective action related to ACP payments, Board# V0611A, AGR separation from ANG Selective Retention Review Board (SRRB) consideration, and TERA. Counsels complete response is at Exhibit N. _______________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03067
4 INDEX CODE: 102.03, 131.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 APRIL 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was selected for augmentation in the Regular Air Force and his record be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel in the primary zone. The AFBCMR has considered these previous cases: In an application dated 18 January 1965, the applicant, a captain,...