Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00169
Original file (BC-2005-00169.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-00169
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Jul 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  conditions,  abdominal   aortic   aneurysm,
hypertension, spinal disc  condition,  and  bilateral  knee  conditions,  be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His conditions are the result of injury or illness incurred while  on  alert
status, training for combat, or flying in support of B-52  alert  or  combat
missions.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application.  His complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air  Force  on  8
Jan 54.  He was  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of  senior  master
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1
Dec 69.  He served as an Aircraft Maintenance  Technician.   He  voluntarily
retired from the Air Force on 31 Jul 75, having served 21 years,  6  months,
and 23 days on active duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 12 Apr 04 based upon the  fact  that
his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to  be  combat-
related.  On 7 Feb 05, his PTSD was approved, rated at 50%.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states a review of his  service  and  DVA
medical records show his abdominal  aortic  aneurysm,  hypertension,  spinal
disc condition, and  bilateral  knee  conditions  are  not  combat  related.
Although stress can be a contributing  to  arteriosclerotic  heart  disease,
the condition cannot be approved based on stress  alone  since  this  factor
cannot be objectively determined as the definitive cause of  this  condition
rather than other causes.  For heart disease  and  hypertension  to  qualify
for CRSC, it must be  secondary  to  Agent  Orange  contracted  diabetes  or
presumptive to POW internment and so stated in  the  rating  decision.   His
spinal disc condition and knee  conditions  are  the  result  of  falls  off
aircraft.  Injuries sustained by falling off a military  device,  where  the
fall was not caused by the device itself, are not considered to be  eligible
for CRSC.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states from 1967 through 1868 he was assigned  in  Ubon,  Thailand
with duties in jungle areas which were defoliated and burnt from combat  and
aviation  fuel.   There  is  a  good  chance  he  was  exposed  to  chemical
defoliants as they were deployed  from  the  same  base  he  was  in  direct
support of.  He has been diagnosed with  borderline  diabetes,  which  is  a
possible symptom.  His fall was from an  ice  covered  aircraft  in  England
while deployed for a possible cold war  action  with  nuclear  weapons.   He
fell from a  B-52  in  1971  while  attempting  a  repair  during  a  launch
supporting the war in  Vietnam.   The  fall  was  caused  by  wet  and  oily
conditions.   Due to the constant stress imposed on SAC line chiefs to  have
all aircraft and personnel in a war ready status he developed  hypertension.
 This took place over many years.

His complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinions and recommendations  of  the
Air Force offices of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of
an error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find
no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2005-
00169 in Executive Session on 4 Jan 06, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Jan 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPDC, dated 7 Feb 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Feb 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00663

    Original file (BC-2004-00663.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Dec 66, he underwent a laminectomy to repair a herniated disc, which he suffered while engaged in hazardous duty as a KC-135 Navigator on a mission from Andrews AFB to Seattle WA. He served 21 years, 6 months, and 27 days on active duty Available documentation reflects a DVA combined compensable rating of 70% for his unfitting conditions. His records reveal no record of any particular injury that could account for the onset of his back pain.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00250

    Original file (BC-2004-00250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00250 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated Mandatory Case Completion Date: 30 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertensive heart disease, knee prosthesis, degenerative arthritis, and traumatic arthritis, be assessed as combat related in order to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03608

    Original file (BC-2005-03608.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bottom-line is whether or not falling off the rung of an aircraft ladder, due to a mis-step, is considered combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jan 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03824

    Original file (BC-2003-03824.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries occurred during training operations and according to CRSC criteria he is eligible for compensation since the injuries were incurred during an ORI and while deployed to Egypt to participate in Operation Accurate Test. The Medical Consultant states the fact that a member incurred a disability during a period of war or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00508

    Original file (BC-2005-00508.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. There is no information to confirm he incurred injuries to his shoulders while performing combat related duties. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04065

    Original file (BC-2003-04065.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04065 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition, hemorrhoids, and high blood pressure, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00504

    Original file (BC-2004-00504.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00504 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, back strain, condition of the skeletal system, arteriosclerotic heart disease, and hiatal hernia, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00214

    Original file (BC-2004-00214.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00214 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected disabilities, Loss of Part of Skull, Spinal Disc Condition, and Caisson Disease of the Bones, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02604

    Original file (BC-2004-02604.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02604 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Feb 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...