Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01229
Original file (BC-2008-01229.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-01229
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected  medical  conditions,  intervertebral  disc  syndrome,
hypertension,  arteriosclerotic  heart  disease,  and  peripheral   vascular
disease (right and left legs), be assessed as  combat-related  in  order  to
qualify for compensation  under  the  Combat  Related  Special  Compensation
(CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While in the Air Force he served as a chaplain.  Once a week  he  would  fly
on one of the missions on a B-52 aircraft for moral support.  These  flights
were the greatest tension experienced in his  life.   His  hypertension  and
heart disease was caused by combat stress while serving in  Thailand  during
the Vietnam War.  Stress was a contributing factor to both hypertension  and
intervertebral disc syndrome.

In support of his request, the applicant provided  documentation  associated
with his CRSC application.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

After serving 20 years and 25 days on active  duty,  the  applicant  retired
from the Air Force on 1 November 1981 in the  grade  of  lieutenant  colonel
having assumed that temporary grade effective and with a date of rank of  12
February 1974.  He served as a Chaplain.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 90% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 29 October 2003 based upon the  fact
that his service-connected medical conditions  were  determined  not  to  be
combat-related.  He appealed the decision  and  on  12  September  2007  the
appeal was disapproved.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.   DPPD  states  for  hypertension  and  related
heart or vascular disabilities to  qualify  for  CRSC,  it  must  be  either
secondary to diabetes  mellitus  contracted  by  exposure  to  Agent  Orange
(herbicides) or presumptive to Prisoner of War (POW)  internment,  and  this
must be so stated in the applicable  DVA  Rating  Decision.   There  was  no
evidence the applicant was a POW and he  stated  he  did  not  set  foot  on
Vietnamese soil which eliminates the possibility of presumptive exposure  to
Agent Orange.

Furthermore, to  approve  a  disability  for  CRSC,  documentation  must  be
provided showing a definite, causal relationship  between  a  combat-related
event and the resulting injury.  There was no  evidence  of  any  incidents,
accidents, or events while flying that caused intervertebral disc  syndrome.
 This lack of evidence prevents consideration under current  CRSC  criteria.
While the applicant’s conditions meet  the  DVA  requirements  for  service-
connected compensation, the evidence does  not  support  compensation  under
CRSC.

The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the evaluation and asks the Board  to  disregard  the
unwarranted, unrelated, extraneous, verbose,  obfuscating  comments  of  the
evaluation.  Is any part of his military disability combat related?   If  so
let the record so indicate.

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The available evidence of record does  not
support  a  finding  that  the  service-connected  medical  conditions   the
applicant believes are combat-related were incurred as the direct result  of
armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the  performance  of
duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of  war;
and, therefore, do not qualify for compensation  under  the  CRSC  Act.   We
agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was  denied  without
a personal appearance; and the application will only  be  reconsidered  upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not  considered  with
this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
01229 in Executive Session on 19 August 2008, under the  provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 November 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 24 June 2008, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 June 2008.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 21 July 2008.





                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02923

    Original file (BC-2007-02923.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service-connected medical condition of the nervous system (occipital headaches), hypertension, intervertebral disc syndrome (cervical) and neurology of the middle radicular nerve group (left arm) be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Program in order to qualify for compensation. In support of his request, the applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03250

    Original file (BC-2005-03250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Dec 71, the Air Force PEB recommended that the removed from the TDRL and returned to active duty. For this condition to qualify for CRSC, it must be specifically granted by the DVA as presumptive to Agent Orange exposure. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03916

    Original file (BC-2008-03916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DVA award was 50 percent, his CRSC award was 40 percent with Special Monthly Compensation. In this respect, it appears that while the DVA increased his combined service-connected disability rating to 50 percent, the particular disability that has been determined combat-related remains rated at 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00089

    Original file (BC-2007-00089.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00089 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 JULY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act in order to qualify for compensation under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01009

    Original file (BC-2008-01009.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For hypertension to qualify for CRSC, it must be secondary to diabetes mellitus contracted due to exposure to Agent Orange or presumptive to prisoner of war internment, and this must be stated in the applicable Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision. The DVA rating decision dated 6 Aug 85 notes he received medication for hypertension in 1981 and the rating decision dated 25 Jun 07 reflects he was diagnosed with diabetes mellitus in November 2006. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03850

    Original file (BC-2005-03850.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 August 1980, he was relieved from active duty in the grade of technical sergeant and retired from the Air Force on 1 September 1980, having served 20 years and 13 days on active duty. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03608

    Original file (BC-2005-03608.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bottom-line is whether or not falling off the rung of an aircraft ladder, due to a mis-step, is considered combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Jan 06 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00169

    Original file (BC-2005-00169.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00169 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hypertension, spinal disc condition, and bilateral knee conditions, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00924

    Original file (BC-2005-00924.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00924 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: DVA HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, cardiomyopathy and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...