Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01308
Original file (BC-2004-01308.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01308
            INDEX CODE:
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be  provided  the  opportunity  to  make  a  Career  Status  Bonus  (CSB)
election.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The opportunity to accept or decline CSB was never  given  to  him  and  his
Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) shows that he has yet to make a choice.

In support of his request, applicant  provided  a  copy  of  his  LES.   His
complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  15
Dec 87.  He has been  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of  technical
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1
May 00.  His window of opportunity to make a CSB election began  on  15  Jul
02 an ended 15 Dec 02.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRR recommends denial.  DPPRR  states  if  a  member  does  not  have
eligibility or has not made an election by the 16th  year  of  service,  the
member will remain in the high-3/50% retirement plan.  The retired  plan  of
CHOICE is reflected on the LES  of  each  individual  that  has  a  Date  of
Initial Entry into Uniformed Service (DIEUS) on or after 1 Aug  86.   If  an
election is not made by the prescribed time, the member will remain in High-
3.  Based on Air Force policy, his window of opportunity is past and  he  is
no longer eligible for the  program.   He  provides  no  information  as  to
whether he  previously  inquired  about  his  notification  of  eligibility.
Information  and  criteria  for  this  program  is  available  through  many
sources.  The DPPRR evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states he did not receive formal notification of his CSB  election
options.  He did not pursue researching  Air  Force  web  sites  or  consult
career advisors because he knew he was qualified for CSB and he  thought  an
options printout would be generated.  The Virtual MPF was a  relatively  new
system at the time and did not have  information  about  CSB.   Due  to  the
unreliable MilPDS he has now surpassed his 16-year mark.   With  the  launch
of the new MilPDS  software  in  March  2002  there  were  glitches.   These
glitches caused major problems Air Force wide to include CSB  notifications.
 His unit was not proactive in taking care of people.  Had the  MPF  ensured
the unit  compliance  with  monthly  eligibility  status,  they  would  have
identified him and others and requested an update.

In support of his request  applicant  provided,  copies  of  MilPDS  message
transmissions, several  memorandums,  a  copy  of  MPFM  01-10,  and  a  CSB
election form.  His complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,  we  do  not
find his uncorroborated assertions sufficiently persuasive to  override  the
rationale provided by the Air Force.  We are not persuaded that  during  the
18 month window he was eligible to render an election to accept  or  decline
CSB, resources were not reasonably made  available  to  the  applicant  that
would  made  him  aware  of  his  eligibility  to  render  a  CSB  election.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation  of  the  Air  Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis  for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01308 in Executive Session on 3 Jun 04, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Apr 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRR, dated 23 Apr 04.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Apr 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant ,dated 23 May 04, w/atchs.




                                   GREGORY H. PETKOFF
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01387

    Original file (BC-2005-01387.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not notified that he was eligible for the CSB until after he served 16 years in the Air Force. The applicant does not provide information whether he inquired to his servicing military personnel flight (MPF) regarding CSB eligibility at anytime in the past two years. GREGORY H. PETKOFF Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-01387 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01122

    Original file (BC-2004-01122.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 May 02, the applicant was notified of his eligibility to make a CSB election. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant provided a response indicating his dispute is not with AFPC and how they handled his submission, but rather with the MPF not following appropriate guidance regarding the CSB, as well as their failure to contact him about the Air Staff’s guidance concerning installments options. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00315

    Original file (BC-2006-00315.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to an Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) staff inquiry to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) requesting a copy of the CSB notification letter to the applicant - AFPC/DPPRR has indicated that they requested the applicant’s base to review the applicant’s records and provide them a copy of the CSB notification letter that was sent to the applicant; however, they were unable to provide a copy of the notification letter. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03577

    Original file (BC-2004-03577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Examiner’s Note: Members, like the applicant, whose DIEUS is on or after 1 Aug 85 and are eligible for the CSB are notified with a “Notification of Career Status Bonus REDUX Eligibility” that they may make a choice of retiring under REDUX (40% at 20 years plus the CSB) or under High-3 (50% at 20 years). A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02062

    Original file (BC-2005-02062.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPRR states if a member does not have eligibility or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service, the member will remain in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for this program. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that when he was briefed on CSB no time frame was mentioned. After a thorough review of the evidence presented, it appears the applicant was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01275

    Original file (BC-2004-01275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since her CSB election form was late and subsequently disapproved, she never came under REDUX but is still under the High-3 retirement plan.] A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility notification, or the date they reach their 15th year of active service, whichever comes later. If a member does not elect REDUX in the prescribed time, the member...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-0772

    Original file (BC-2006-0772.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant does not provide any information whether she inquired to her commander, Command Support Staff (CSS), or servicing Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding CSB eligibility at anytime in the past three years. DPPRR indicates if a member is not eligible or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service; the member remains in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for the CSB program. The CSB eligibility notification letter should have been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01561

    Original file (BC-2004-01561.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 Sep 03, the applicant was notified of his eligibility to make a CSB election. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was notified of his eligibility to make a CSB election on 9 Sep 03, with a six-month suspense to submit the prescribed CSB election form. In this respect, we note after being notified of his eligibility to make a CSB election on 9 Sep 03, the applicant acknowledged he understood he had until Mar 04 to make his election and return the required form.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01897

    Original file (BC-2004-01897.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The notification should be provided on or before the date a member completes 14 years and 6 months of active service. He also did not provide any information showing he inquired of his Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding his CSB eligibility at anytime in the past two years. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jul 04 for review and response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00848

    Original file (BC-2004-00848.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never notified that he was eligible to elect the CSB. Note: DIEUS date was formally known as the Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) date. Applicant states he was denied an opportunity to render a CSB election, because he was not notified by Air Force officials of his CSB election window.