Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01122
Original file (BC-2004-01122.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01122
            INDEX CODE:  128.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be  corrected  to  reflect  a  change  in  his  window  of
eligibility to make a Career Status Bonus (CSB) election.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

A determination was made he was ineligible  to  make  a  CSB  election
because he had exceeded the suspense date to do so.  He believes he is
a victim of injustice because he was never notified that guidance  had
been released on CSB installment options, and because of the  lack  of
action by the involved Military Personnel Flights (MPFs).

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded statement
and documentation pertaining to the CSB, to include his election form.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Information extracted from the Personnel Data System  (PDS)  indicates
the applicant is currently serving on active  duty  in  the  grade  of
master sergeant, having been promoted to that grade on 1 Jun 02.   His
Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is 14 May 87.

On 16 May 02, the applicant was notified of his eligibility to make  a
CSB election.

A DD Form 2839, Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election,  provided  by  the
applicant indicates he was determined to be eligible for a CSB and was
notified on 22 Jan 04.  He signed the form indicating  he  elected  to
receive the CSB in a lump sum payment of $30,000 on 3  Feb  04,  which
was witnessed by his commander.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRR recommended denial indicating  a  member  must  submit  the
prescribed CSB election form and any other required forms as  directed
in the eligibility notification no later than the  date  that  is  six
months after they received  eligibility  notification.   According  to
AFPC/DPPRR, information and criteria for the CSB program are available
through many sources, to include, but not limited to,  the  Department
of Defense (DoD) and Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC)  websites,  and
Base Career Advisors.  Based on  Air  Force  policy,  the  applicant’s
window of opportunity is  past  the  suspense  and  he  is  no  longer
eligible for this program.  In their view, the applicant’s  submission
was handled properly.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRR evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant provided a response indicating his dispute is not with  AFPC
and how they handled his submission,  but  rather  with  the  MPF  not
following appropriate guidance regarding the CSB,  as  well  as  their
failure to contact him  about  the  Air  Staff’s  guidance  concerning
installments options.  He was never  contacted  until  after  his  CSB
selection was rejected.

Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
available  evidence,  we  are  not  persuaded  corrective  action   is
warranted  in  this  case.   The  evidence  of  record  indicates  the
applicant was notified of his eligibility to make a CSB election on 16
May 02, with  a  six-month  suspense  to  submit  the  prescribed  CSB
election form.  However, he opted to delay his decision  awaiting  the
Air Staff guidance on installment  options.   The  available  evidence
reflects such guidance was released in Oct 02, one month prior to  the
expiration of his window of eligibility.  He contends he  was  advised
by his MPF to wait until he was contacted by them  regarding  the  Air
Staff guidance on installment options  but  was  never  notified  such
guidance  had  been  released.   Other  than   the   applicant’s   own
uncorroborated assertions, he has not established he was not notified.
 Also, we note information and criteria regarding the CSB program were
available through a variety  of  sources.   Furthermore,  although  it
appears the applicant may have been advised he could hold  off  making
an election beyond his original six-month suspense, he did not make an
election until 3 Feb 04, almost two years after he was notified of his
eligibility  to  make  an  election.   While  we  find  his  situation
unfortunate, in our  opinion,  the  applicant  did  not  exercise  due
diligence concerning this matter.  In view of the  foregoing,  and  in
the absence of sufficient evidence he  was  treated  differently  from
similarly  situated  individuals,  we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-01122 in Executive Session on 2 Jun 04, under the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair
      Mr. Charlie E. Williams, Jr., Member
      Mr. Terry L. Scott, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Mar 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRR, dated 23 Apr 04.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Apr 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, applicant, undated.




                                   ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR.
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01298

    Original file (BC-2003-01298.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this timeframe, DFAS informed the MPF the applicant could not receive a 2002 TSP payment since his request for a bonus to be distributed in TSP was not established until 2003. The applicant requests a CSB installment payment in the amount of $10,000 be applied retroactively to his TSP account effective 23 Oct 02, along with any interest he may have accrued. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01308

    Original file (BC-2004-01308.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he did not receive formal notification of his CSB election options. We are not persuaded that during the 18 month window he was eligible to render an election to accept or decline CSB, resources were not reasonably made available to the applicant that would made him aware of his eligibility to render a CSB election. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00848

    Original file (BC-2004-00848.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never notified that he was eligible to elect the CSB. Note: DIEUS date was formally known as the Date Initially Entered Military Service (DIEMS) date. Applicant states he was denied an opportunity to render a CSB election, because he was not notified by Air Force officials of his CSB election window.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01897

    Original file (BC-2004-01897.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The notification should be provided on or before the date a member completes 14 years and 6 months of active service. He also did not provide any information showing he inquired of his Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding his CSB eligibility at anytime in the past two years. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 9 Jul 04 for review and response.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-0772

    Original file (BC-2006-0772.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant does not provide any information whether she inquired to her commander, Command Support Staff (CSS), or servicing Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding CSB eligibility at anytime in the past three years. DPPRR indicates if a member is not eligible or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service; the member remains in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for the CSB program. The CSB eligibility notification letter should have been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01275

    Original file (BC-2004-01275.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since her CSB election form was late and subsequently disapproved, she never came under REDUX but is still under the High-3 retirement plan.] A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility notification, or the date they reach their 15th year of active service, whichever comes later. If a member does not elect REDUX in the prescribed time, the member...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02216

    Original file (BC-2005-02216.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 May 2005, the applicant appealed his case for CSB to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC). The notification should be provided on or before the date a member completes 14 years and 6 months of active duty service. The Board notes if a member has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service, the member will remain in the High- 3/50% retirement plan and is not eligible for the CSB program.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02062

    Original file (BC-2005-02062.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPRR states if a member does not have eligibility or has not made an election for CSB by the 16th year of active service, the member will remain in High-3/50% retirement plan and is no longer eligible for this program. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that when he was briefed on CSB no time frame was mentioned. After a thorough review of the evidence presented, it appears the applicant was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03577

    Original file (BC-2004-03577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Examiner’s Note: Members, like the applicant, whose DIEUS is on or after 1 Aug 85 and are eligible for the CSB are notified with a “Notification of Career Status Bonus REDUX Eligibility” that they may make a choice of retiring under REDUX (40% at 20 years plus the CSB) or under High-3 (50% at 20 years). A member must submit the prescribed CSB/REDUX election form and any other required forms as directed in the eligibility notification no later than six months after they received eligibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00315

    Original file (BC-2006-00315.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to an Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) staff inquiry to the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) requesting a copy of the CSB notification letter to the applicant - AFPC/DPPRR has indicated that they requested the applicant’s base to review the applicant’s records and provide them a copy of the CSB notification letter that was sent to the applicant; however, they were unable to provide a copy of the notification letter. ...