RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00793
INDEX CODE: 102.08
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be amended to reflect a correction to his service dates,
to include his Date of Rank, Pay Date, Active Duty Service Commitment
Date (ADSCD), and Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
It appears his military records did not contain his original swear in
dates. His original appointment date was 6 March 03, rather than 13
May 03, which was the date his rank changed to first lieutenant.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided copies of
documentation pertaining to his oath of office and commissioning
information.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
An AF Form 133, Oath of Office (Military Personnel) indicates the
applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force
(Nurse Corps), on 6 Mar 03.
His available military personnel records indicate he was appointed a
first lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force (Nurse Corps), on 13 May 03
and was voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on 1 Jun 03.
Information extracted from the Personnel Data System (PDS) indicates
the applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
first lieutenant, with a current grade date of rank (CGDOR) of 20 Jan
03. He has a Pay date of 13 May 03, a Total Active Federal Military
Service Date (TAFMSD) and a Total Active Federal Commission Service
Date of 1 Jun 03, a DDLDS of 10 Sep 03, and an ADSCD of 26 Apr 07.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAMF2 recommended denial noting the applicant originally signed
an AF Form 133 on 6 Mar 03, reflecting he was appointed a second
lieutenant in the Nurse Corps. He signed another AF Form 133 on 13
May 03, reflecting he was appointed a first lieutenant in the Nurse
Corps. According to AFPC/DPAMF2, the applicant’s constructive service
credit was computed based on the AF Form 133 dated 13 May 03.
Although the governing Air Force Instruction (AFI 36-2005) does not
address a previous Oath of Office, the applicant’s constructive
service credit was computed based on the Oath of Office that was
received with the appointment package.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAMF2 evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial noting that after being appointed on
6 Mar 03, he was notified he was permanently disqualified by the Air
Education and Training Command (AETC) Surgeon General’s (SG) office
for certification. At that point, his job reservation was cancelled.
The process was started to get documentation to disprove his
disqualification; eventually, he was qualified by the SG and appointed
again on 13 May 03 and entered on active duty on 1 Jun 03. Therefore,
the latter date of 13 May 04 is the valid commissioning date.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 28
May 04 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPPAE
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence the applicant’s Reserve of the
Air Force appointment on 13 May 03 as a first lieutenant was
erroneous, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-00793 in Executive Session on 29 Jun 04, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. James E. Short, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAMF2, dated 9 Apr 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 May 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 04.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02528
The applicant questions why his constructive service credit wasn’t computed and presented to him before he separated from the Navy on 14 Jan 04 and commissioned as a captain on 15 Jan 04. After reviewing the complete evidence of record, we believe errors were made that constitute an injustice to the applicant. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00008
The applicant was also ineligible for experience credit from 1 Aug 99 to 14 Mar 00 due to receiving a graduate nurse license on 9 Aug 99 from the state of Delaware and then not passing their board until 15 Mar 00. Applicant discusses why the date of 30 Jan 98 indicated on his AF Form 24 as the date of his permanent license is incorrect. However, they state the applicant should not receive the total amount of constructive service credit he is seeking because the time prior to receiving...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00328
Her grade, date of rank, and pay date are all correct. She states that prior to her withdrawal from the program she attempted to contact the appropriate Air Force officials, but could not reach anyone and therefore received no further guidance from the Air Force before she was allowed to withdraw from the training program. The applicant acknowledges that based on the HPSP contract she signed, her date of rank as a second lieutenant when she entered active duty is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2005-00328
Her grade, date of rank, and pay date are all correct. She states that prior to her withdrawal from the program she attempted to contact the appropriate Air Force officials, but could not reach anyone and therefore received no further guidance from the Air Force before she was allowed to withdraw from the training program. The applicant acknowledges that based on the HPSP contract she signed, her date of rank as a second lieutenant when she entered active duty is correct.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02261
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02261 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed to 1 Oct 10 and recoupment of his debt of $57,000.00 be stopped. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMF2 recommends changing the applicant's retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01441
Upon reentering the military in the BSC, she was initially awarded two full years of credit without specifying which dates were the dates for which she received the educational credit. Per USC Title 10, “A period of time shall be counted only once when computing constructive service credit.” To prevent awarding service credit for the same period of time for her commissioned military service time and time spent earning her MPH degree, DPAFM2 must subtract her two years of educational credit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01365
DPPAE states the Air Staff announced release of the SRB list on 29 Mar 04, that would go into effect on 30 Mar 04. There is no way the Military Personnel Flight could have advised the applicant to wait until 30 Mar 04 to reenlist because no one knew when the Air Staff would release the new list. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01423
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01423 INDEX CODE: 107.00; 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Army Achievement and Army Commendation Medals earned during her service in the Army (1993-1997) be filed in her Air Force Officer Selection Record (OSR), her duty title, Clinical Nurse, Medical/Oncology, be added under...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03010
However, they do recommend that all of the applicant’s OPRs closing on or after 1 May 01 be corrected to reflect the grade of major and placed on AF Form 707A. Additionally, during discussions with AFPC/DPPPEP on 10 Feb 06, we noted that while the substitute OPRs provided by the applicant have been changed to reference the grade of major, several still contain the same PME recommendations made on the Company Grade reports. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as...