RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01365
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show that he reenlisted on 30 Mar 04, rather
than 9 Mar 04.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Two weeks after he reenlisted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) rate
for his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was increased from 2.0 to 2.5. If
he had been notified of the change, he would have waited to reenlist to get
the additional $5,000.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his reenlistment
contract and an email communiqué. His complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 30
Nov 94. He has been progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Oct 01.
On 9 Mar 04, he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and was authorized a
multiple 2.0 SRB.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
APFC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states the Air Staff announced release
of the SRB list on 29 Mar 04, that would go into effect on 30 Mar 04.
There is no way the Military Personnel Flight could have advised the
applicant to wait until 30 Mar 04 to reenlist because no one knew when the
Air Staff would release the new list. The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jun
04 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2004-
01365 in Executive Session on 27 Jul 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Mrs. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Jun 04.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jun 04.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00793
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00793 INDEX CODE: 102.08 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be amended to reflect a correction to his service dates, to include his Date of Rank, Pay Date, Active Duty Service Commitment Date (ADSCD), and Date Departed Last Duty Station (DDLDS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03778
In accordance with the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, the applicant was honorably discharged on 27 July 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that since the applicant was discharged under the DOS Rollback Program and was serving on the Control Roster, his separation code of JBK...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02285
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he was notified in late 1999 to early 2000 that he needed to obtain or decline retainability, he informed the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) and signed a letter of intent that he would reenlist in early Jul 00 to receive the most of his SRB as possible. Members must have, obtain retainability, or decline to obtain retainability within 30 days of making their overseas returnee selection. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00097
She was briefed that she was entitled to an SRB for the 16 months of her second extension. The extension contract provided clearly shows she was counseled she was entitled to the SRB. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the error on her one-month extension contract indicating her entitlement to an SRB, is administrative in nature and does not, in itself, authorize...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03913
He recently separated and has been informed that he is still entitled to portion of the bonus for the time that he served. On 2 December 2003, the applicant signed and initialed Air Form Form 3008 (Supplement to Enlistment Agreement - United States Air Force) acknowledging he understood the terms and conditions of his enlistment agreement which did not include an initial enlistment bonus. In this respect, the Board notes at the time the applicant signed and initialed his enlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02994
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02994 INDEX NUMBER: 128.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), 4N051, Aerospace Medical Service Journeyman. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00032 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Mandatory Case Completion Date: 7 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid for accrued leave. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because of an incorrect zip code, he never received his leave to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03613
AFBCMR BC-2002-03613 INDEX CODE: 112.00 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: SSAN: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Staff and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01939
Therefore, the first date that the applicant was eligible for reenlistment was 1 May 2004. Evidence supports that even though the applicant was eligible to reenlist upon receiving his 3-skill level in June 2003, it appears his action to delay his reenlistment until March 2004 was solely his own choice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 September 2004, under the...