RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02968
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She believes her RE code of 2X is unjust because she received an honorable
discharge, and numerous awards and letters of appreciation for her
performance.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submitted a copy of her DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; a copy of her AF
Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSGT) closing 27 Dec 00 and
copies of two letters of character reference and two letters of
appreciation.
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 28 Apr 99 for a period
of four years in the grade of airman basic. She was promoted to the grade
of senior airman on 28 Apr 02.
On 23 Jan 03, the squadron commander denied the applicant’s reenlistment,
stating she had not performed up to Air Force standards in both the work
place and off duty. Her repeated breaches in discipline, integrity, work
ethic and failures to pay her debts countered all Air Force core values.
She received repeated counseling from her supervisors and first sergeant,
with negative results. Applicant appealed this decision; her appeal was
denied.
On 4 Feb 03, she received an Article 15 for failing to maintain sufficient
funds in her bank account for the purposes of automatic payment to her
Bank. Her sentence consisted of suspended forfeiture of $832 until 3 Aug
03.
On 27 Apr 03, she was released from active duty and transferred to the Air
Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 and was issued an RE code
of 2X [First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not
selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)].
She was credited with 4 years of active duty.
After reviewing the applicable instruction, AFI 36-2606, it appears that
the RE code issued is correct.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim
of an error or injustice. At the time members are separated from the Air
Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their
service and circumstances of their separation. After a thorough review of
the evidence of record, we believe that given the circumstances surrounding
the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in accordance with the
appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-02968
in Executive Session on 3 December 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Michelle Grace, Member
Mr. Christopher Carey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Aug 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
CHARLENE BRADLEY
Panel Chair
A letter was submitted requesting a copy of the IG Investigative report pertaining to the applicant and SMSgt F- ---. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Mar 01 for review and response within 30 days. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of her appeal, we do...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01763
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01763 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 131.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank be changed from airman basic to airman first class. The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. The evidence of record reflects that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03173
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03173 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed and that her Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) be added to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty. On 30 Aug 01, she was released from active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02616
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02616 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation and reenlistment codes be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS states they believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02367
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Staff Judge Advocate’s statement concerning his appeal of an Article 15 he received on 17 Jan 85 made reference to another airman who was being discharged at the same time and did not pertain to him. On 26 Feb 85, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found no errors or irregularities in the discharge case file and recommended that the applicant be furnished a general discharge. On 5 Jun 87, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-02219
Applicant’s military personnel records reveal that, on 8 March 1997, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the Air Force Reserve under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (completion of active required service). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: HQ AFPC/DPPAOR states the applicant’s service dates and date of rank to the grade of E-4 are correct. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03361
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03361 INDEX CODE: 100.02, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C and his reason for separation (Personality Disorder) be changed. They further agreed with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant and recommended the separation code and narrative reason...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02394
In support of the application, the applicant submits his separation document, a letter from AFLSA/ADC, copies of support letters (3), and copies of documentation from his military personnel record. On 13 August 1997, the applicant was discharged from the Air Force Reserve and accepted for enlistment in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman basic for a period of four years. The applicant was honorably discharged on 12 September 2001 for completion of required active service with a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02421
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When she transferred from the Navy to the Air Force Reserve, she should have been credited for her DEP time, and that her pay grade should have reflected her prior enlisted service with 16 years of total credit toward pay. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA indicated that administrative actions have been taken to correct the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02558
We note that, at the time the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) was announced for the applicant’s career field, she had planned to extend her enlistment rather than reenlist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was honorably discharged on 2 July 2003 rather than 31 July 2003 and reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on...