RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02792
INDEX CODE: 121.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His retirement date be changed to reflect 1 October 2002, rather than
1 September 2002.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During his retirement processing he was allowed to sell 28 days leave over
the maximum allowable amount of leave that can be sold. Actions have been
taken against him to withdraw the overpayment from his retired pay account.
The commander of Financial Services and --- AB, -- acknowledged it was
their mistake and informed him that he could have taken action to extend
his retirement date and recommended he apply for a waiver of the debt. His
waiver was denied by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). If
he had been advised correctly during his retirement processing he would
have requested extension of his retirement date and avoided the problems.
During the time period, his son was sick with a disorder that claimed his
life and he was not focused totally on his retirement processing.
In support of his request, applicant provided, a personal statement,
documentation associated with his request for waiver of his indebtedness.
His complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 2
Mar 79. He was progressively promoted to the grade of chief master
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 1
Sep 99. Applicant retired from the Air Force on 31 Aug 02. He served 23
years, 7 months, and 22 days on active duty.
Upon his retirement applicant was paid for 36 days of leave. An audit of
his account at DFAS determined that he had previously sold 52 days of leave
and was only authorized to sell back 8 days upon his retirement. A debt
was established for $4,340.70.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSFM recommends approval of the adjustment of his retirement date.
DPSFM states that had he been properly counseled he may have been able to
use all of his accrued leave.
The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends approval based on the fact that he sold back 28 days
of leave based on information provided to him by his Financial Service
Office. DPPRRP recommends either of the following options:
1) Allow payment of the 28 days of leave as an exception to Title 37
rather than adjusting the applicant's retirement date.
2) Adjust his effective date of retirement to compensate him for the
28 days leave. This adjustment would credit him with 30 days of active
duty and allow the applicant to receive an additional 2 days of unserved
active duty credit.
The DPPRRP evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 10
Oct 03 for review and comment if desired. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient evidence has been presented in regards to the changing of
his retirement date. Since applicant had requested a retirement date of 1
Sep 02, we do not believe that a change in his retirement is warranted.
Extending the applicant's retirement would credit him with time not served
and would essentially result in a windfall of increased retired pay for the
rest of his life--the total of which could ultimately exceed the monetary
value of the lost 28 days.
4. Notwithstanding the above findings we believe sufficient relevant
evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice
that would warrant partial relief. Based on misinformation that was
provided to the applicant, he was erroneously allowed to sell 28 days of
leave and a debt was subsequently established in the amount of $4,340.70.
Because the debt was through no fault of the applicant's, we believe that
the debt should be remitted. Therefore, we recommend that his records be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 August 2002, he submitted an
application for remission of his debt to the government for overpayment of
28 days leave; that his request was approved on that same date by competent
authority; and that any payments made to this debt be refunded.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
02792 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
Mrs. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Aug 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 24 Sep 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 2 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-02792
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 31 August 2002, he
submitted an application for remission of his debt to the government for
overpayment of 28 days leave; that his request was approved on that same
date by competent authority; and that any payments made to this debt be
refunded.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00642 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 in order to use the 68 days of leave he had accrued. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends that the applicant be paid...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03490
DPSFM states that the Master Military Pay Account should be corrected to reflect 29 days, the combined periods of convalescent leave, as lost leave after the applicant retired. Since the applicant has already been paid for 60 days of leave, DPSFM recommends that his retirement date be adjusted by 29 days, for the period of lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03240
AFI 36-3003 requires members to receive payment for up to 60 days accrued leave and affords them time to take any accrued leave in excess of the 60-day limit. Members retiring or separating for disability are authorized to use accrued leave that they cannot sell back as a result of this process. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, reviewed the application and states that in accordance with Title 10 USC 701, members cannot sell more than a cumulative total of 60 days leave during a military career. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922
When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02431
However, he was placed on the retired list effective 1 June 2001 and received retired pay through November 2001. Although he was selected for continuation on active duty, the Retirements Processing Section at AFPC was not notified until after the 1 June 2001 retirement had consummated in MilPDS. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While AFPC contends he was an active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01925
When he was on active duty from July 2002 through February 2004, he tried to resolve a portion of his debt. He believes the countless hours spent to resolve his pay record problems show that no one knows if his pay record is correct. He respectfully requests the Board waiver the remaining $3517.76 and have DFAS return the money he’s been paying them in the time he’s tried to resolve this case.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02333
DPSFM states that the applicant began FY03 with 47 days of leave and would have accrued 17.5 days of leave by his retirement date of 30 April 2003 for a total balance of 64.5 available days of leave. Therefore the government is owed for the 5.5 days of extra leave the applicant took as part of his terminal leave. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...