RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00642
INDEX NUMBER: 121.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His retirement date be changed from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 in order to
use the 68 days of leave he had accrued.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He initially requested a retirement date of 1 Feb 03 and was briefed
that he could sell the 68 days of leave he had accrued. He questioned
this as he had previously heard that he could only sell 60 days in a
career and had previously sold 60 days. He was advised that the
limitation did not apply to leave sold during retirement.
Due to circumstances beyond his control, he requested that his
retirement date be changed to 1 May 03. His request was denied on 30
Jan 03 and he had to out process by 31 Jan 03. It was then that he
learned that he would also lose his accrued leave. If he had been
properly advised, he never would have requested a retirement date of 1
Feb 03.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 29 Jul 81. He
retired effective 1 Feb 03 with 21 years, 6 months, and 2 days of
service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSFM recommends approval of the applicant’s request. The
applicant received an e-mail from the Finance Service Office (FSO)
stating that he was miscounseled at the time of his retirement. The
applicant lost 65 days of leave when he retired on 1 Feb 03. He
brought 58 days forward from FY02 to FY03; he earned 10 days of leave
during FY03 and used 3 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave
Program, Para 4.6 limits payment for accrued leave to 60 days in a
career. Based on the miscounseling, the applicant’s retirement date
should be adjusted to include the 65 days of lost leave.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends that the applicant be paid for the 65 days of
lost leave rather than adjusting his date of retirement. They provide
their rationale in discussing the two options:
a. Allow payment of the 65 days of annual leave rather than
adjusting applicant’s effective date of retirement. This would be an
exception to Title 37, United States Code, Section 501 and AFI 36-
3003, Military Leave Program, which states members are only allowed to
sell 60 days annual leave during a military career.
b. Adjust the applicant’s effective date of retirement to
compensate him for the 65 days of lost leave. The effective date of
all nondisability retirements is set by Title 5, United States Code,
Section 8301, as the first day of the month after the month in which
retirement otherwise would be effective. Therefore, the applicant’s
retirement date would have to be adjusted from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 to
compensate him for the 65 days of lost annual leave. This adjustment
would credit the applicant with 89 days active duty and result in him
receiving an additional 24 days of unserved active duty credit.
The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review
and comment within 30 days. To date a response has not been received.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We concur with the Air Force’s
determination that the applicant was miscounseled regarding his
entitlement to sell leave and that some relief is warranted. After
weighing AFPC/DPSFM’s recommendation to adjust the applicant’s
retirement date to include 65 days of lost leave and AFPC/DPPRRP’s
recommendation to pay the applicant for the lost leave, we believe an
alternative approach that incorporates the two recommendations is the
most appropriate. However, we note that since the applicant is
precluded by law from selling additional leave beyond the 60 previously
sold, being paid an equivalent amount through an authorized entitlement
is the only way he can be compensated for his unused leave. The Board
only employs such a correction where the alternative would be a clear
injustice to the applicant. The Board believes that the circumstances
of this case support such an action. In this case, had the applicant
not been miscounseled, in order to retire by 1 Feb 03 and not lose his
leave, he could have started terminal leave approximately two weeks
after the 14 Nov 02 date his request for retirement was approved. His
other option would have been to request a later retirement date and
take an appropriate amount of terminal leave to utilize his available
balance. The applicant has indicated that he would have requested a
later retirement date, which would have extended his active duty
service. Since we have no basis to doubt his statement, we believe the
most appropriate relief would be to extend his retirement date and
place him in a terminal leave status. However, as pointed out in the
evaluation prepared by AFPC/DPPRRP, to extend his retirement date to 1
May 03, as requested by the applicant, would result in his receiving
credit for unserved active duty time. In our view, a correction that
is both fair to the applicant and the Air Force is to extend his
retirement date to 1 Apr 03 and compensate him for his remaining leave
balance. By extending his retirement date to 1 Apr 03, the applicant
earns an additional 5 days of leave resulting in a balance of 70 days
vice the 65 reflected in the Air Force evaluations. Extending his
retirement date to 1 Apr 03 would require him to be in terminal leave
status for 59 days and would leave a balance of 11 days. Therefore, it
is our recommendation that the applicant’s records be corrected as
indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was in a temporary duty status for a sufficient number
of days beginning 2 January 2003 and was entitled to per diem in an
amount equivalent to eleven (11) days of basic pay.
b. He was not retired effective 1 February 2003, but continued
on active duty in a terminal leave status until 31 March 2003, on which
date he was relieved from active duty and retired for sufficient length
of service effective 1 April 2003.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-
00642 in Executive Session on 4 September 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Ms. Nancy Wells Drury, Member
Mr. Robert H. Altman, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 16 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 24 Jun 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jul 03.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-00642
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show
that:
a. He was in a temporary duty status for a sufficient
number of days beginning 2 January 2003 and was entitled to per diem
in an amount equivalent to eleven (11) days of basic pay.
b. He was not retired effective 1 February 2003, but
continued on active duty in a terminal leave status until 31 March
2003, on which date he was relieved from active duty and retired for
sufficient length of service effective 1 April 2003.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02792
The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends approval based on the fact that he sold back 28 days of leave based on information provided to him by his Financial Service Office. Since applicant had requested a retirement date of 1 Sep 02, we do not believe that a change in his retirement is warranted. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02792 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03490
DPSFM states that the Master Military Pay Account should be corrected to reflect 29 days, the combined periods of convalescent leave, as lost leave after the applicant retired. Since the applicant has already been paid for 60 days of leave, DPSFM recommends that his retirement date be adjusted by 29 days, for the period of lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03240
AFI 36-3003 requires members to receive payment for up to 60 days accrued leave and affords them time to take any accrued leave in excess of the 60-day limit. Members retiring or separating for disability are authorized to use accrued leave that they cannot sell back as a result of this process. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, reviewed the application and states that in accordance with Title 10 USC 701, members cannot sell more than a cumulative total of 60 days leave during a military career. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01177
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFOC recommended approval noting the applicant requested an extension of his HYT in Nov 03, but was disapproved by AFPC/DPPRR on 4 Feb 04. AFPC/DPSFOC indicated that since his second request was disapproved on 11 Mar 04 and his retirement date was 1 Apr 04, this only left the applicant enough time to out-process the Air Force prior to his retirement. They believe the applicant’s retirement date...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922
When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02804
He earned 30 days of leave during FY04 and used 31 days of leave. He earned 10 days of leave between 1 Oct 04 and 31 Jan 05 and used eight days of leave. In a 23 Dec 04 letter, the applicant once again stated he did not understand he was applying for a 1 Feb 05 retirement date.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02909
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02909 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 39.5 days of leave he sold as an enlisted member when he was discharged from the Navy to attend Air Force Officer Training School (OTS) be restored. He separated from the Navy on 15 Aug 02 expecting to...