Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02333
Original file (BC-2003-02333.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02333
            INDEX CODE: 121.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The $1,157.91 debt owed the government for five and one half  days  of
excess leave be reversed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

All the leave taken at the end of his career was cleared  through  the
accounting and finance office at Scott Air Force Base  (AFB).   During
his out-processing, he asked exactly how much leave he had accrued and
he took the amount the accounting and finance office cleared for him.

In support of his appeal, applicant has provided copies of  his  April
2003 leave and earnings statement (LES), his retirement order, his out
processing checklist, approved leave request forms for the periods  10
Feb 03 (20 days for permissive TDY), and 2 Mar 03  (60  days  terminal
leave), numerous retrievals from the Personnel Data System (PDS),  and
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Prior to his scheduled retirement date of  30  April  2003,  applicant
requested terminal leave of 60 days from 2 March 2003 through 30 April
2003 that combined with other leave  taken  during  fiscal  year  2003
(FY03) totaled 70 days.  Applicant had accrued only 64 days  of  leave
during FY03.  His retirement was effective 1 May 2003.  He had  served
23 years, 9 months, and 29 days and was retired as a  Master  Sergeant
(E-7).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSFM recommends denial.  DPSFM states that the  applicant  began
FY03 with 47 days of leave and would have accrued 17.5 days  of  leave
by his retirement date of 30 April 2003 for a total  balance  of  64.5
available days of leave.  During FY03 however, the  applicant  used  7
days of leave from 27 January  2003  through  2 February  2003  and  3
additional days of leave from  26  through  28 December  2002.   DPSFM
calculates when the applicant requested, and was approved to take,  60
days of terminal  leave;  he  only  had  54.5  actual  days  of  leave
available to him.  Therefore the government is owed for the  5.5  days
of extra leave the applicant took as part of his terminal leave.   The
applicant was correctly placed in excess leave for the  remaining  5.5
days of his terminal leave.

DPSFM’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
19 September 2003 for review and comment within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  He did not keep adequate track  of  his  leave
and consequently used more leave than he accrued.  Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02333  in  Executive  Session  on  28  October  2003,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
      Ms. Leslie E. Abbott, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 July 2003, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 16 Sep 03, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 03.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00642

    Original file (BC-2003-00642.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00642 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 in order to use the 68 days of leave he had accrued. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends that the applicant be paid...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922

    Original file (BC-2003-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03240

    Original file (BC-2002-03240.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-3003 requires members to receive payment for up to 60 days accrued leave and affords them time to take any accrued leave in excess of the 60-day limit. Members retiring or separating for disability are authorized to use accrued leave that they cannot sell back as a result of this process. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01888

    Original file (BC-2005-01888.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant requests 60 days of leave be restored to his leave account and he be entitled to sell his leave upon his 1 May 2005 retirement. The Air Force has recommended restoring 60 days to the applicant’s leave account. In reviewing the applicant’s MMPA, DFAS determined, however, that the applicant’s account should have reflected 26.5 days of leave at the time of his retirement.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02792

    Original file (BC-2003-02792.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends approval based on the fact that he sold back 28 days of leave based on information provided to him by his Financial Service Office. Since applicant had requested a retirement date of 1 Sep 02, we do not believe that a change in his retirement is warranted. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02792 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0100259

    Original file (0100259.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a letter from the CAOC7 Deputy Commander requesting restoration of the applicant’s lost leave (Exhibit A). Accordingly, the Board majority believes that his records should be corrected as indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that 5.5 days of annual leave were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00855

    Original file (BC-2003-00855.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit B. While on convalescent leave, the applicant went to the Bahamas for four days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jun 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00675

    Original file (BC-2003-00675.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Korean Defense Service Medal, The Republic of Korea Service Cease-Fire Period Medal, The Republic of China 823 Campaign Badge of Honor, the Republic of China U.S. Mutual Defense Commemorative Badge, the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03490

    Original file (BC-2003-03490.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSFM states that the Master Military Pay Account should be corrected to reflect 29 days, the combined periods of convalescent leave, as lost leave after the applicant retired. Since the applicant has already been paid for 60 days of leave, DPSFM recommends that his retirement date be adjusted by 29 days, for the period of lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1999-02923a

    Original file (BC-1999-02923a.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Oct 01, the AFBCMR was notified that in conjunction with the FY02 Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline Colonel Promotion Selection Boards, the applicant was recommended for promotion to major by the A0497A – Judge Advocate General (JAG) Major Promotion Board. On 15 Nov 01, the AFBMCR corrected the applicant’s records to show that; he was considered and selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of Major by the FY97 JAG Major Promotion Board, with a date of rank and effective date of 30...