RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03490
INDEX CODE: 121.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His unused terminal leave be restored, convalescent leave be annotated
correctly, official retirement date be adjusted or an exception to policy
be enacted so he may be financially compensated for his unused leave.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The accounting and finance office placed improper leave codes concerning
his terminal and convalescent leave in the data system and they did not
seek proper guidance on how to administer his excess leave. The Military
Personnel Flight was not familiar with the procedures in administering his
excess leave beyond his retirement date.
In support of his appeal, applicant submits copies of his AF Form 988,
Leave/Request Authorizations, a copy of his orders for convalescence, and
two supporting letters. Applicant's complete submission, with
attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 31 January 2003, the applicant submitted an application for retirement,
with an effective retirement date of 1 August 2003. On 31 July 2003, the
applicant was relieved from active duty and was retired in the grade of
chief master sergeant (E-9) effective 1 August 2003. Applicant was
credited with 31 years and 18 days of total active duty service for basic
pay and 30 years, 11 months and 23 days active service for retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSFM recommends partial relief. DPSFM states that AFI 36-3003,
Military Leave Program, specifies that the commander will not approve more
than 30 days’ initial convalescent leave. Extending convalescent leave
beyond 30 days requires additional medical review and consent. DPSFM
states that the applicant provided a copy of Part II of his AF Form 988,
approving 85 days of convalescent leave from 21 May 2003 through 13 August
2003. This leave form was not coordinated with the Medical Treatment
Facility (MTF). He also provided a copy of a second convalescent leave
period for 85 days from 16 July 2003 through 10 October 2003. This leave
form was coordinated and signed by the MTF. A review of the Master
Military Pay Account reflects neither of the convalescent leave periods
was updated. DPSFM states that the Master Military Pay Account should be
corrected to reflect 29 days, the combined periods of convalescent leave,
as lost leave after the applicant retired. Since the applicant has
already been paid for 60 days of leave, DPSFM recommends that his
retirement date be adjusted by 29 days, for the period of lost leave. A
complete copy of the AFPC/DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
AFPC/DPPRRP recommends the application be denied. DPPRRP states that the
applicant had elective surgery less than six months prior to his
retirement date and did not follow the correct procedures for requesting
the elective surgery. In accordance with AFI 36-3003, defines
convalescent leave as “an authorized absence normally for the minimal time
essential to meet the medical needs for recuperation. It is not
chargeable leave.” Because the applicant’s elective surgery was not
approved previous to his retirement, DPPRRP states that the applicant was
not authorized to have elective surgery, nor have convalescent leave based
upon that surgery. There is no evidence that the applicant requested
cancellation of his approved 73-day terminal leave in order to substitute
convalescent leave. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPRRP evaluation is at
Exhibit C.
The Chief Medical Standards Branch advises that the podiatrist sent two
notes requesting 12 weeks of convalescence for each surgery which does not
necessarily mean that he be granted 12 weeks of convalescent leave, just
that he be given appropriate consideration for his post-operative
condition. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Prior to his first surgery, the applicant states he contacted his Military
Personnel Flight and asked what were the procedures for having surgery
while on terminal leave. He was told if the surgery required convalescent
leave, his terminal leave would stop, and he would be placed in a
convalescent status. His primary care manager advised him that he
normally approves 14 days in the beginning and after postoperative follow-
ups a determination would be made on any additional days. The Accounting
and Finance Office (AFO) assured him that the paperwork would get into the
system. He advised the AFO that he was retiring and did not have until
2006 to use his excess accumulation of leave days. At his final out-
processing briefings and appointments, he was never advised that he had to
get additional approval for his convalescent leave. The applicant’s
letter is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant partial relief. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence submitted in support of his appeal, it
is our opinion that credible evidence has been provided to show that the
applicant acted in good faith by contacting his Military Personnel Flight
prior to his foot surgeries regarding the procedures for requesting
convalescent leave while in a terminal leave status. However, due to
administrative errors beyond the applicant’s control, his convalescent
leave was improperly coded as ordinary leave. Additionally, the evidence
of record shows that the applicant’s commander, who was the
approval/disapproval authority, incorrectly authorized the convalescent
leave. In view of the foregoing, we believe that relief is warranted in
this matter. We have noted that AFPC/DPSFM has recommended that the
applicant’s retirement be adjusted by 29 days; however, it is our opinion
that the most appropriate course of action is to award the applicant 84
days of leave. By such action, we believe that the applicant will be
afforded proper and fitting relief. The Board notes, however, that the
applicant has already sold the maximum 60 days of leave allowed by law,
necessitating that we compensate him by other means. Therefore, we
recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicted below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was in a temporary duty status
for a sufficient period of time beginning 10 February 2003 and was paid
total per diem in an amount equivalent to eighty-four (84) days of pay and
allowances.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 March 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
All members voted to grant the record as indicated. The following
documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2003-03490:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSFM, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 17 Dec 03,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, Chief Medical Standards Branch,
dated 15 Dec 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jan 04.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Feb 04.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-03490
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was in a temporary duty
status for a sufficient period of time beginning 10 February 2003 and was
paid total per diem in an amount equivalent to eighty-four (84) days of
pay and allowances.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00642 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 in order to use the 68 days of leave he had accrued. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends that the applicant be paid...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00855
The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit B. While on convalescent leave, the applicant went to the Bahamas for four days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jun 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01333
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01333 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 25.5 days of leave be restored and she receive payment for those days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
He was unable to exhaust his leave prior to his date of retirement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRP recommends the application be approved. In view of the above, we recommend that the applicant be afforded relief by correcting his record as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04402
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 32 days of advance leave she was charged while on leave in in Shreveport, LA be restored. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922
When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02090
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP also recommends that the applicant be compensated for five days of leave. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Oct 02 for review and comment within 30 days. The Board agrees with the recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility to...
The two periods of leave should have been time off and not charged as leave. There are commanders that take care of their careers and then there are commanders that want to be good leaders and managers. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00919 in Executive Session on 18 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair Mr. Mike Novel, Member Ms. Marilyn Thomas,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03242
She used 15 days during FY07. Additionally, paragraph 4.1.4, Use of Leave, recommends members be given the opportunity to take at least one leave period of 14 consecutive days or more each FY and encourages them to use the 30 days of leave they accrue each year. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the documentation submitted in support of her appeal, we find no evidence that at the time of her separation from the Air Force, a condition existed that rendered her unable to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...