RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02799
INDEX CODE: 121.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to sell back to the Government the balance of his leave
as of 31 July 2000.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has already sold the maximum number of leave days allowed. Due to
circumstances beyond his control, he could not utilize all his leave
prior to retiring. He had originally planned to utilize all of his
leave in conjunction with his retirement. He had completed leave
request forms and had his leave denied by his commander. The
Government had him on administrative hold, and denied him the
opportunity to take his leave prior to retiring. He states that he
should be allowed the opportunity to sell the remainder of his leave
to the Government and not lose it, due to his request for leave denied
and his retirement being granted honorably.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits leave request forms signed
by his commander, and denying his request for leave. Also, a
statement from his First Sergeant, who was aware of his request for
leave and being denied the opportunity to utilize all his leave he had
accrued.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letters prepared by
the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Field Operations Branch, AFPC/DPSFM, reviewed the
application and states that in accordance with Title 10 USC 701,
members cannot sell more than a cumulative total of 60 days leave
during a military career. Applicant sold the maximum number of leave
days allowed during his career. Therefore, they recommend denial of
applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
The Retirement Programs & Policy Section, AFPC/DPPRRP, reviewed the
application and states that based on the information provided to them
by applicant’s MPF/Orderly Room telephonically, applicant out
processed on 10 June 2000 and was on terminal leave. Applicant was
still on leave according to the first sergeant on 11 July 2000, but he
was not sure if applicant had completed a leave form (AF Form 988).
They further state that there are too many inconsistencies in this
member’s case to clearly substantiate any error or injustice.
Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 June 2001, complete copies of the Air Force evaluation were
forwarded to applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant relief. Due
to an investigation, applicant was denied the opportunity to use 38
days of leave prior to his retirement on 1 August 2000. After
reviewing the circumstances surrounding the leave in question, we
believe that the applicant should be compensated for 38 days of leave.
However, since the applicant received payment for 60 days of leave, we
are precluded by Title 37, Section 501, from granting the applicant’s
request as stated. We considered extending his mandatory retirement
date for one month under the provisions of Title 10, United States
Code, Section 637. However, the retired pay he received and any
civilian wages he may have earned during that period would offset the
dollar amount of the 38 days of leave, thereby reducing the immediate
“value” of the relief given. More importantly we did not feel this
remedy to be in the best fiscal interests of the Air Force. In this
regard, extending the applicant’s retirement date by one month would
credit him for time not served and would essentially result in a
windfall of increased retired pay for the rest of his life--the total
of which could ultimately exceed the monetary value of the lost 38
days. Therefore, in an effort to afford the applicant full, yet fair,
relief for the loss of 38 days of leave, we recommend that the
applicant’s records be corrected as set forth below. In arriving at
our decision, we contacted the Defense Finance and Accounting Service
(DFAS-DE) and they determined that in order to provide applicant pay
for 38 days he would need to be placed in a temporary duty status
(TDY) for 18.75 days to Patrick AFB, FL. We believe that this
recommended correction provides the applicant with proper relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was in temporary
duty status at Patrick AFB, FL, for 18.75 days beginning on 5 July
2000.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 16 August 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSFM, dated 31 May 01.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 5 Jun 01, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 15 June 01.
JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 00-02799
INDEX CODE: 121.03
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that he was in temporary duty
status at Patrick AFB, FL, for 18.75 days beginning on 5 July 2000.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02107
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because he applied for a Stop Loss waiver that was approved, he did not have enough time before his retirement date to use 10 remaining days of leave on his account. DPPRRP notes that the applicant only had 2 days from his Stop Loss waiver approval to his effective retirement date but states that the applicant had the opportunity to extend his retirement effective date up to 30 days and neglected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00642
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00642 INDEX NUMBER: 121.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement date be changed from 1 Feb 03 to 1 May 03 in order to use the 68 days of leave he had accrued. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends that the applicant be paid...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02792
The DPSFM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPRRP recommends approval based on the fact that he sold back 28 days of leave based on information provided to him by his Financial Service Office. Since applicant had requested a retirement date of 1 Sep 02, we do not believe that a change in his retirement is warranted. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-02792 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction...
He was unable to exhaust his leave prior to his date of retirement. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRP recommends the application be approved. In view of the above, we recommend that the applicant be afforded relief by correcting his record as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03490
DPSFM states that the Master Military Pay Account should be corrected to reflect 29 days, the combined periods of convalescent leave, as lost leave after the applicant retired. Since the applicant has already been paid for 60 days of leave, DPSFM recommends that his retirement date be adjusted by 29 days, for the period of lost leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02804
He earned 30 days of leave during FY04 and used 31 days of leave. He earned 10 days of leave between 1 Oct 04 and 31 Jan 05 and used eight days of leave. In a 23 Dec 04 letter, the applicant once again stated he did not understand he was applying for a 1 Feb 05 retirement date.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03299
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 November 2002 for review and comment within 30 days. Based on the fact that the applicant did not want to take the leave, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02922
When he out-processed on 31 December 2002, the leave still had not been restored to his account and he was told that he would need to submit an application to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) to have the leave restored. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSFM states that paragraph 10.9.7 of the AFI 36-3003, states in part a member’s application for correction of military records must clearly establish...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2001-03610
A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommended denial, indicating that a review of the disability processing records does not show any variances from normal procedures for a member in the Air Force Disability Evaluation System (DES). Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-POCC indicated that their records show that...
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. The Special Programs Section, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, also evaluated the case and recommended against extending the applicant’s retirement date because there are no provisions of law that permit extending a Regular officer’s mandatory retirement date, other than specific reasons/laws listed in the evaluation. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRRP, dated 10 May 00, w/atchs. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-00692 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...