Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-022711
Original file (BC-2003-022711.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-02711
            INDEX CODE:  112.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The one (1) month extension to his enlistment be cancelled.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He felt rushed and did not  receive  ample  advice  to  make  a  sound
decision during his permanent change of station (PCS) briefing.

In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of AF Form  1411,
Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in  the  Regular
Air Force/Air Force Reserve.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Member currently serves in  the  Regular  Air  Force  as  a  technical
sergeant.  He reenlisted on 2 August 1999 for 6  years  giving  him  a
date of separation (DOS) of 1 August 2005.  On 7 May 2003, he extended
this enlistment for 1 month to qualify for a  CONUS  assignment.   His
new DOS is 1 September 2005.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial.  Member  initialed  that  he  understood
that he could reenlist rather than extend and that he chose to  extend
at that time.  Under  current  rules  of  operation,  member  will  be
eligible  to  reenlist  in  September  of  2004  or  if  he   requires
retainability for another service directed requirement.

The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
12 Sep 03, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of an  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air  Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
02711 in Executive Session on 29 October 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Ms. Marilyn Thomas, Vice Chair
                 Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
                 Mr. Albert F. Lowas Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 03 w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 28 Aug 03.
      Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Sep 03.





      MARILYN THOMAS
      Vice Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00163

    Original file (BC-2003-00163.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Failure to cancel the extension within the 30-calendar day limit will be considered a willingness on my part to serve out the extension.” The applicant’s 30 days to cancel the extension began the day his assignment to Kadena AB was canceled; therefore, he should have had enough time to cancel the extension within the time limit. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02486

    Original file (BC-2003-02486.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was not counseled concerning career field options or enlistment entitlements. Applicant contends that he should have received an enlistment bonus based on his prior service experience and knowledge and that he was not properly counseled at the time of his enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03177

    Original file (BC-2003-03177.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AF Form 1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve) indicates that on 17 Apr 03, the applicant extended his enlistment for eight months to qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment, changing his DOS to 21 Apr 05. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03071

    Original file (BC-2003-03071.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was considered by Physical Evaluation Board and was advised by his counsel that the PEB decision "would not be in his best interest" and he was returned to duty. The Medical Consultant quotes the presumption of fitness as stating "active duty members who develop medical problems...". The board did not give favorable consideration to any evidence presented on his behalf including 18 years of outstanding service, medical records diagnosing bulging discs with radiating pain, and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02273

    Original file (BC-2003-02273.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02273 INDEX CODE: 112.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His ten-month extension of his enlistment contract be cancelled. This extension provided him with 36 months retainability, which would have been required for an accompanied tour to the United Kingdom. Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00796

    Original file (BC-2003-00796.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He completed an Air Force (AF) Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve; however, he never received a copy of the updated AF Form 1411. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that when the applicant signed the AF Form 1411, his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was not eligible to receive a Zone C SRB; therefore,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01450

    Original file (BC-2003-01450.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Dec 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01009

    Original file (BC-2003-01009.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was credited with 7 years, 2 months, and 29 days active service (includes 160 days of lost time due to confinement) (total of all periods of service). They also noted that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, nor did he provide any facts warranting an upgrade of his discharge. The discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing regulations and we find no evidence to indicate that his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01296

    Original file (BC-2003-01296.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His original reporting date was 31 Dec 01 which required a DOS of 16 Jan 04. PCS retainability requirements are determined by the assignment RNLTD. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02776

    Original file (BC-2005-02776.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members of the Board Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, and Ms. Patricia R. Collins, considered this application on 12 October 2005. MARILYN M. THOMAS Vice Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 19 Sep 05 AFBCMR BC-2005-02776 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction...