RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02017
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her undesirable characterization of service was based on one incident with
extenuating circumstances, during an otherwise uneventful period of
service. Her discharge was the result of her reaction to an event directed
towards her by her roommate that was not addressed by her dorm manager.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 85 and was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class. On 4 Dec 86,
she was convicted by a special court martial of two counts of wrongful
appropriation of currency valued at about $175 and $120 from another
airman, two counts of forgery, and one count of being disrespectful to a
superior noncommissioned officer. Her sentence, adjudged and affirmed was
forfeiture of $400 pay per month for 3 months, reduction to the grade of
airman basic, confinement at hard labor for 3 months, and a bad conduct
discharge. She was discharged on 24 Jul 87. She served 1 year, 8 months,
and 27 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that the applicant's discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge
authority. She did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors in
her discharge processing. She provided no other facts warranting an
upgrade of the discharge. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Jul
03 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant an upgrade of her
discharge to general. Other than her own uncorroborated assertions,
evidence has not been provided which would lead us to believe that the
action taken to affect her discharge from the Air Force was improper or
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the
time; or, that the characterization of her service was based on factors
other than her own misconduct. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that she has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. We considered upgrading her discharge on
the basis of clemency; however, the applicant has failed to provide
documentation pertaining to her post-service activities. Accordingly,
based on the available evidence of record, we find no compelling basis upon
which to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
02017 in Executive Session on 21 Aug 03, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 May 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Jul 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02409
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02409 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors in her discharge processing. We see no evidence of an error in this case and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00866
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00866 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01825
Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 25 Jun 96. All records indicate he was discharged in 25 Jun 96. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03997 INDEX NUMBER: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. A copy of the AFDRB Hearing Record is attached at Exhibit C. The applicant’s records were administratively corrected on 12 Jul 00 to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01673
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01673 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge proceedings. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00146
In support of his request, the applicant submits personal statements and copies of her father’s DD Form 214 and Statement of Service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). After considering the evidence and testimony, the Board of Officers determined that the former member should be discharged with an undesirable discharge because of unfitness.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01150
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01150 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCTOBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03241
On 29 Aug 00, the applicant received notification that she was being recommended for discharge for erroneous enlistment. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that the requested relief should be approved.
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 Jun 90 in the grade of airman basic for a period of 4 years. In a legal review of the discharge case file, the Staff Judge Advocate recommended that the discharge authority direct the applicant be discharged with a general discharge. On 12 Nov 98, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for upgrade of her...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02993
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02993 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...