Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01825
Original file (BC-2003-01825.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-01825
            INDEX CODE:  110.01
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His date of separation be corrected.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He entered active duty 20 Sep 95 and was released  in  July  1998.   His  DD
Form 214 has a separation date of 25 Jun 96.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:


Applicant enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  20  Sep  95.   He  was
progressively promoted to the grade of  airman  having  assumed  that  grade
effective and with a date of rank of 20 Mar 96.

On 10 Jun  96,  applicant  was  notified  by  his  commander  that  she  was
recommending that he be discharged from the Air  Force  in  accordance  with
AFPD  36-32  and  AFI  36-3208,  paragraphs  5.26.1  and  5.49,  for   minor
disciplinary infractions.  He was advised of his rights in this  matter  and
acknowledged receipt of the notification on that same date.  On 17  Jun  96,
after consulting counsel, applicant waived his right  to  submit  statements
on his own behalf.  In a legal review  of  the  case,  the  assistant  staff
judge advocate, found the case legally sufficient and  recommended  that  he
be  discharged  with  a  general  (under  honorable  conditions)  discharge,
without  probation  and  rehabilitation.   On  24  Jun  96,  the   discharge
authority  concurred  with  the  recommendation  and  directed  that  he  be
discharged without probation and rehabilitation.  Applicant  was  discharged
from the Air Force on 25 Jun 96.  He served 9 months and 6  days  on  active
duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states  that  there  are  no  documents
contained in his records that would indicate he was separated in July  1998.
 All records indicate he was discharged in 25 Jun 96.  The DPPRS  evaluation
is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11  Jul
03 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice that would warrant  corrective  action.   We
took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits  of
the case; however, based on the evidence of  record,  it  appears  that  his
correct date of separation is 25 Jun 96.  Evidence has  not  been  presented
which would lead us to believe otherwise.   Therefore,  we  agree  with  the
opinion  and  recommendation  of   the   Air   Force   office   of   primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or  injustice.   In
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find  no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
01825 in Executive Session on 21 Aug 03, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
      Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 May 03.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 1 Jul 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 03.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9903256

    Original file (9903256.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-03256 INDEX CODE 110.02 106.00 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 1995 general discharge be upgraded to honorable and the narrative reason of “Misconduct” be changed to “Convenience of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02807

    Original file (BC-2002-02807.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant was discharged from the Air Force on 7 Jun 85. He petitioned the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to upgrade his discharge to honorable in 1993. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we do not believe he has been the victim of an injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802328

    Original file (9802328.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records reflects that the applicant, a former United States Air Force Academy cadet, was ordered to extended active duty on 1 Jun 94. The applicant erroneously tested for promotion to staff sergeant for the 95E5 cycle on 8 May 95.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200973

    Original file (0200973.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00973 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to enlist in the Army. h. On 4 Jan 96, the applicant failed to complete Volume IV of his CDC's on time and received a letter of reprimand on 7 Feb 96. i. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02409

    Original file (BC-2003-02409.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02409 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors in her discharge processing. We see no evidence of an error in this case and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-00310

    Original file (BC-2001-00310.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2001-00310 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge be upgraded. The AFLSA/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02837

    Original file (BC-2002-02837.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His dishonorable discharge be upgraded to honorable. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant's appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03091

    Original file (BC-2002-03091.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03091 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his discharge be changed from “Misconduct- Drug Abuse.” __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made an error in judgement on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03091

    Original file (BC-2002-03091.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03091 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his discharge be changed from “Misconduct- Drug Abuse.” __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made an error in judgement on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875

    Original file (BC-2005-03875.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...