RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01731
INDEX CODE: 111.01
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 27 March 2001,
Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) P0401A and any associated memoranda
regarding the referral period be removed from his records and his corrected
record be considered by a Special Selection Board.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The referral OPR covers a six-and-a-half month period when he was assigned
as commander of a remote and isolated detachment on the north end of
Okinawa, Japan. He believes that his relief from command and the contested
OPR is unjust because 1). He was not given the opportunity to correct or
modify his performance, nor was his formal feedback conducted; 2). He was
held accountable for issues under his command that pre-dated his arrival;
3). His supervisor was geographically separated from him during the
duration of his assignment and could not accurately assess neither the
issues he faced nor his efforts to correct these challenges; 4). The
results of an action he took to address and correct the challenges faced at
Okuma due to a self-initiated Unit Climate Assessment, was used as
ammunition to remove him from command.
He is an officer who earned a full 4-year ROTC scholarship to an Ivy League
school, excelled at every assignment both at the base level and at the
command. He was selected to attend the highly competitive AFIT in-
residence program while still only a first lieutenant. In his last OPR
before separating from active duty, his commander names him number one of
thirty-seven company grade officers. He has certainly made mistakes in
his first command and does not intend to portray himself as blameless.
However, the net effect this referral OPR rendered to his career is wholly
disproportionate to any errors he may have committed. He can be of great
service to the Air Force.
In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides a personal statement, a
copy of the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) decision with
attachments, copies of his OPRs for the period beginning 15 February 1992
and ending 1 November 2002 and a supporting statement from his current
commander.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Data extracted from the personnel data system reveals that the on 1 January
2003, the applicant, who was released from active duty on 31 December 2002,
was transferred to the Air Force Reserve and assigned as an Individual
Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) in the grade of captain, with an effective
date of rank of 5 October 1995. He has a total federal commissioned
service date and paydate of 25 May 1991. The Military Personnel Data
System reflects that he is currently assigned as Deputy Chief of Services,
Keesler AFB, MS.
He was considered and not selected for promotion to the active duty grade
of major by the P0401A and P0402A central selection boards which convened
on 18 June 2001 and 19 February 2002 respectively. Applicant’s OPR profile
for the last 6 reporting period follows:
Period Ending Evaluation
23 May 1998 Meets Standards
23 May 1999 Meets Standards
23 May 2000 Meets Standards
*27 Mar 2001 Meets Standards
20 Nov 2001 Meets Standards
01 Nov 2002 Meets Standards
*Denotes Contested Report
The applicant received an AF Form 709, Promotion Recommendation Form, for
the P0401A Selection Board and received an overall recommendation of
“Promote.” Applicant’s appeal under the provisions of AFI 36-2401,
Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports was denied on 22 January
2003.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPE recommends the application be denied. DPPPE states that the
ERAB denied his request based on the fact that the OPR contained factual
information that the applicant was relieved of command. The rating chain
at the time the report was rendered was clear why they made mention of this
fact on the report. DPPPE states that other than the applicant’s opinion,
nothing was provided to prove that his rating chain was out to get him for
actions he took after a Unit Climate Assessment. The memo provided from
the rater does not state that the decision to remove the applicant from
command was a mistake. Instead, it clearly states that the applicant was
“not the right man at the right time in his career for a rough remote
assignment.” This does not negate the OPR; it proves that the statement by
the rater that the applicant was relieved of command has merit. The
AFPC/DPPPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPPO states that since AFPC/DPPPE recommends denial, SSB
consideration is not warranted. DPPPO states that the applicant has two
nonselections to the grade of major by the CY01 (P0401A) (18 Jun 01) and
CY02 (P0402A) (19 Feb 02) Major Central Selection Boards. The AFPC/DPPPE
evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 October 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice to warrant removing the contested
referral report and PRF from his records, and providing him promotion
consideration by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY01A Central
Major Selection Board. In this respect, we note the referral report and
PRF contain references to his relief of command. The statements from his
rating chain, indicate he inherited a unit suffering from deep and long-
standing personality division between military and civilian personnel.
Both evaluators indicate they continue in their opinion that his removal
was in the best interest of the unit and the mission based on the
information gathered in the Unit Climate Assessment (UCA); however, they
have subsequently received information which indicates he was subjected to
extreme efforts to undermine his endeavors and was unfairly blamed for the
totality of the unit’s problems. In view of this, and given the relatively
short period of time he served as detachment commander, a majority of the
Board recommends his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. The Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form 707B,
rendered for the period 24 May 2000 through 27 March 2001, be declared void
and removed from his record.
b. The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, prepared
for the Calendar Year 2001A Central Major Selection Board be declared void
and removed from his records.
It is further recommended that his record be considered for promotion to
the grade of major by a Special Selection Board for the Calendar Year 2001A
and any subsequent boards for which the OPR, closing 27 March 2001, was a
matter of record.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01731
in Executive Session on 5 November 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
By majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records, as recommended.
Mr. Russell voted to deny applicant's request but does not wish to submit a
minority report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 May 03 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPE, dated 29 Jul 03, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 23 Sep 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Oct 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01731
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. The Company Grade Officer Performance Report, AF Form
707B, rendered for the period 24 May 2000 through 27 March 2001, be, and
hereby is, declared void and removed from his record.
b. The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709,
prepared for the Calendar Year 2001A Central Major Selection Board be, and
hereby is, declared void and removed from his records.
It is further directed that his record be considered for promotion to
the grade of major by a Special Selection Board for the Calendar Year 2001A
and any subsequent boards for which the OPR, closing 27 March 2001, was a
matter of record.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00601
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00601 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: It appears the applicant is requesting revised Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRFs) for the CY01A (P0401A) and CY02B (P0402B) Central Major Selection Boards. Her CY02B PRF was written by the same squadron commander who...
The legal facts and wording of the new PRF mirrored those of the original PRF provided to the applicant 30 days prior to the promotion board. The applicant contends that the revised PRF “communicated a less powerful and positive message from the first PRF.” However, the majority notes that the applicant did not provide supporting statements from his senior rater or the MLR president; rather, he only provided the original PRF and revised PRF which was changed by the senior rater at the...
DPPPO states that the applicant wrote a letter to the board explaining the date she would take her SOS test; however did not inform the board of her course completion date. DPPPO states that on 24 January 2002, the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) considered the applicant’s request to correct her duty title from “social worker” to “family advocacy.” The ERAB denied her request because it appeared no corrective action was taken before the results of the P0401A board were released and...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03181
The letter of reprimand (LOR), dated 2 Jun 00, and the associated unfavorable information file (UIF) be removed from his records. In his response to the evaluation prepared by AFPC/DPPPO, counsel addresses their recommendation not to remove the letter written by the applicant to the CY00B Major Central Selection Board president. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s requests with the exception of voiding...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00067
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00067 INDEX CODES: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 21 Aug 99 through 20 Aug 00 be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished OPR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03569 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY96A (4 Mar 96) Major Selection Board (P0496A), with inclusion of the corrected Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) provided; the citations...
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated either his OPR contained material errors, or he was placed at a disadvantage at the promotion board because the OPRs of other individuals contained prohibited comments. It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by a...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03653
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03653 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 20 Dec 01 through 5 Sep 02 be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished OPR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02295
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02295 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) that met the CY00A Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be replaced with a reaccomplished report; and he be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special...