Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00817
Original file (BC-2003-00817.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00817
            INDEX NUMBER:  135.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL:  None

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The citations for the following decorations be included in his Officer
Selection Record (OSR) for the Calendar  Year  2001B  (CY01B)  Central
Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Selection Board.

          a.  Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM) for the period 2
Jun 93 to 27 Oct 93.

          b.  JSCM, First Oak Leaf Cluster (1OLC), for the period    4
Jul 92 to 13 Jul 94.

          c.  Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) for the period  6
May 98 to 20 Jun 98.

The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) he was awarded for the  period
15 Jun 95 to 3 Aug 97 be included in his OSR  for  the  CY01B  Central
Lieutenant Colonel Promotion Selection Board.

He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant  colonel  by
special selection board (SSB) for the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel
Promotion Selection Board.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His records were incomplete when he was considered  for  promotion  by
the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel Promotion  Selection  Board.   He
attempted  to  review  his  records  prior  to  the  promotion   board
convening, but due to the events of 11 Sep 01 and the ensuing turmoil,
he never received his records to review.  When he was nonselected  for
promotion, he  requested  his  records  as  they  met  the  board  and
discovered the errors in them.

In support of his appeal, the applicant has  provided  copies  of  the
missing citations and a copy of the citation and orders  awarding  him
the AFCM.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is presently serving on active  duty  in  the  grade  of
major.  His Total Active Federal Military Service Date is 11  Jan  87.
A review of the applicant’s top ten Officer Performance Reports (OPRs)
on file when he was considered for promotion indicate overall  ratings
of “meets standards.”  The applicant  has  two  nonselections  to  the
grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY01B and CY02B Central  Lieutenant
Colonel Promotion Selection Boards.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  The  purpose
of having a citation included in the record  is  not  to  allow  board
members to review the comments on the citation, although they  may  do
so if so inclined.  Rather the purpose is to make them  aware  of  the
level of the decoration.  The applicant’s Officer Selection Brief  did
reflect that he had been awarded the JSCM, JSCM (1OLC), and JSAM.

Regarding the AFCM, the applicant  received  an  Officer  Preselection
Brief  (OPB)  for   two   below-the-promotion-zone   (BPZ)   promotion
considerations as well as for his in-the-promotion-zone consideration,
all with the same error.  They question why  he  did  not  attempt  to
challenge the contested award when he received the OPB for the two BPZ
boards.  Each officer eligible for promotion received  an  OPB  90-100
days prior to the central board convening date.  The OPB contains data
that  will  appear  on  the  OSB  at  the  central   board.    Written
instructions attached to the OPB specifically instruct each officer to
carefully examine the brief for completeness  and  accuracy.   If  any
errors are found, they  must  take  corrective  action  prior  to  the
selection board.  If the applicant had taken corrective  action  prior
to his BPZ boards, his OSB would  have  been  correct  for  the  CY01B
board.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
18 Apr 03 for his review and comments within  30  days.   To  date,  a
response has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
primary basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not  been  the
victim of an  error  or  injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
00817 in Executive Session on 19 June 2003, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Olga M. Crerar, Panel Chair
      Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Member
      Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 Jan 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 14 Apr 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 03.




                                   OLGA M. CRERAR
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01214

    Original file (BC-2006-01214.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial indicating that they assume the misrepresented information the applicant is referring to is the Board Discrepancy Report filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) indicating the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) was not updated in the Military Personnel Data System and that the Defense Meritorious Service Medal (DMSM) citation was missing from her OSR. They have verified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02498

    Original file (BC-2002-02498.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was placed at a competitive disadvantage at the calendar year 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (P0500A), In-the-Promotion Zone (IPZ) for two reasons: (1) A discrepancy in the computerized portion of his OSR, known as the Air Force Officer Selection Brief erroneously indicated to the promotion board that he had been awarded only one MSM when, in fact, he had been awarded two; this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201147

    Original file (0201147.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01147 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. DPPPO states that the order for the AFCM was not filed in his OSR. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03379

    Original file (BC-2002-03379.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03379 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include the award of the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal (MSM 1OLC) and she receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the Calendar Year...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389

    Original file (BC-2003-02389.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02204

    Original file (BC-2006-02204.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02204 INDEX CODE: 107.00; 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 24 JANUARY 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be added to his Officer Selection Record (OSR), and he be granted Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion by the Calendar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01113

    Original file (BC-2004-01113.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant failed to exercise reasonable diligence in maintaining his record prior to the CSBs; therefore, that office recommends denial of the applicant’s request for SSB consideration with the corrected DAFSC. Applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 22 May 1992 to 10 May 1993, did not reflect his correct Duty Air Force Specialty Code S1555E at the time he was considered for promotion by the CY00A, CY01B, CY02B and the CY03A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01849

    Original file (BC-2002-01849.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01849 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to include the award of the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal, 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM 1OLC), his duty title entry corrected and he receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03871

    Original file (BC-2003-03871.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states that each officer eligible for a CSB receives an Officer Preselection Brief (OPB) prior to convening of the board which contains the same data that will appear on the OSB at the central board. The instructions specifically state, “Officers will not be considered by a Special Selection Board if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00095

    Original file (BC-2003-00095.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Had the initial orders, dated 4 Sep 02, been correct in awarding the applicant the AFCM 1OLC rather than the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), we believe the citation for the AFCM 1OLC would have been in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) when she was considered by the CY02B selection board. It is further recommended that she be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board for the CY02B Central Major Selection Board with the corrected record. OLGA M....