RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00512
INDEX NUMBER: 128.05
XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The AF Form 1411, “Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of
Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, he signed on 1 Nov 01 be voided.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was miscounseled by the NCO at the Military Personnel Flight and was
not made aware that he was eligible for a Zone C Selective Reenlistment
Bonus (SRB) if he reenlisted instead of extending his enlistment. As a
result, he has lost a substantial sum of money.
In support of his assertion, the applicant has provided statements of
support from his rating chain.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is presently serving on active duty in the grade of
technical sergeant (TSgt). His Total Active Federal military service
Date (TAFMSD) is 8 Dec 89. His last eight Enlisted Performance Reports
reflect overall ratings of “5.”
_______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request. On the AF
Form 1411, section VIII, applicant initialed stating that he has
considered the advantages of reenlisting instead of executing the
extension. He also initialed section IX where it states that member
understands that he can reenlist rather than extend. He also initialed
that he understood and was informed that he was eligible for a Zone C,
Multiple 5.0 SRB.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26
Apr 02 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The Board was persuaded by the
support the applicant received from his rating chain that the applicant
did not fully understand the impact his decision to extend his
enlistment rather than reenlist would have on his entitlement to a SRB.
The applicant has indicated that had he been aware of his entitlement
to a Zone C SRB, he would have reenlisted instead of extending.
Therefore, we recommend that the applicant’s record be corrected as
indicated below.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. The extension of his 9 September 1998 enlistment for a
period of eight months, executed on 1 November 2001, be voided.
b. He was honorably discharged on 31 October 2001 and
reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 1 November 2001 for a period of
six (6) years, with entitlement to a Zone C, Multiple 5.0, Selective
Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-00512 in
Executive Session on 5 June 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
Mr. Michael Maglio, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 10 Apr 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 26 Apr 02.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AFBCMR 02-00512
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXXX, XXX-XX-XXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. The eight-month extension of his 9 September 1998
enlistment, executed on
1 November 2001, be, and hereby is, declared void.
b. He was honorably discharged on 31 October 2001 and
reenlisted in the Regular Air Force on 1 November 2001 for a period
of six (6) years, with entitlement to a Zone C, Multiple 5.0,
Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02801
His AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, specifies his correct SRB skills authorization as Zone C, Multiple 2.5. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that: a. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 26 Sep 07, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00796
He completed an Air Force (AF) Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve; however, he never received a copy of the updated AF Form 1411. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE states that when the applicant signed the AF Form 1411, his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) was not eligible to receive a Zone C SRB; therefore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00097
She was briefed that she was entitled to an SRB for the 16 months of her second extension. The extension contract provided clearly shows she was counseled she was entitled to the SRB. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the error on her one-month extension contract indicating her entitlement to an SRB, is administrative in nature and does not, in itself, authorize...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03919
They recommend that the extensions executed by the applicant on 28 Sep and 28 Oct 04 be declared void and that his records be corrected to show that on 28 Sep 04, he entered into an extension for a period of 48 months, with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB), Zone B, Multiple 5.5 (to be paid on the day the applicant enters the extension, provided he remains qualified). This will allow the applicant to qualify for both his assignments and, by extending the maximum of 48...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by a Military Personnel Flight (MPF) representative, that if volunteered for an overseas assignment and extended his current enlistment for a period of 36 months to obtain the required retainability, he would receive a Zone C Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) upon entering into the extension. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to the delay in receiving her In-place Base of Preference (IPBOP) assignment approval notification, she began her second extension of her current enlistment contract. We also believe that the MPF had ample time from the date of the assignment approval to provide the applicant the assignment notification and the applicant would have reenlisted on her previously established date of separation...
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jun 02 and again on 21 Jun 02 for review and comment within 30 days. We also accept their recommendation to change the applicant’s reenlistment date to 18 Jan 02. VAUGHN E. SCHLUNZ Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00714 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and...