RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00514
INDEX CODE: 128.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her enlistment extension be canceled and a reenlistment authorized in
its place in order to receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of AF Form
1411 (Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the
Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve), an e-mail with a message
concerning the SRB program and an extract from AFI 36-2606. The
applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
senior airman (E-4).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. DPPAE stated
that, on 17 Oct 00, the applicant extended her 6 year, 29 Jun 95,
reenlistment for 12 months and now has a new date of separation (DOS)
of 28 Jun 02. The applicant’s previous DOS was 28 Jun 01. At the
time the applicant requested information about reenlisting, current
policy stated that a member could only reenlist 90 days prior to their
expiration of term of service (ETS). As the applicant was more than
90 days from her ETS, she was not eligible to reenlist and receive the
Zone B bonus. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 14
June 2002 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. Therefore, absent sufficient evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 23 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Albert J. Starnes, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with
AFBCMR Docket Number 02-00514.
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 6 Jun 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jun 02.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 0 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00954 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REOUESTS THAT: His extension of enlistment on 15 June 1994 be canceled and he be reenlisted into the Regular Air Force for six years with entitlement to a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed the application and states that the applicant was...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 June 2002, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00876 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive the difference between the 2.5 multiple Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 1A4X1 AFSC and a 3.0 SRB for the 1A4X1D. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03679
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We note that, since the applicant was not in a required 5-skill level...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01813
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01813 INDEX CODE: 128.05, 112.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) be paid based on the full four years she reenlisted for on 23 Dec 04 and not be reduced by the time remaining on the 23-month extension she was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02161
On 7 April 2004 applicant applied for a CJR and was approved on 14 April 2004. DPPAE states effective 29 April 2004, the applicant’s SRB was deleted and she was not eligible to reenlist at that time to receive the SRB due to her not being within 3 months prior to her expiration term of service (ETS). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.
He received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 21 Aug 01 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (fraudulent entry into military service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS stated that, on 15 Aug 01, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00288
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She received an assignment notification to Incirlik ABS, Turkey, and was advised that she would have to extend for 14 months to obtain retainability for this assignment. On 15 August 2003 the applicant reenlisted in the United States Air Force for a period of 4 years and 18 months. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03802
According to AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force, on 17 Mar 04, the applicant extended his 3 May 00 enlistment for 18 months for the purpose of having sufficient retainability for Career Airmen Reenlistment Reservation System (CAREERS) retraining into Air Field Management (AFSC 1C7X1). As pointed out by HQ USAF/JAA, the applicant is “better off” with the existing 17-month extension plus a four-year reenlistment, with a four-year SRB,...