Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00385
Original file (BC-2003-00385.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00385
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  None

      SSN        HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect  award  of  the  Armed  Forces
Expeditionary Medal in support of Operation  SOUTHERN  WATCH  and  the
Southwest Asia Service Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

These awards were omitted on his DD Form 214.  He would like  to  have
this corrected for future reference.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s records  reflect he served  on  active  duty  from  22
October 1990 through 19 December 1997.

His DD Form 214 reflects he was  awarded  the  Air  Force  Achievement
Medal, Aerial Achievement Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster,  Air  Force
Longevity Service Award Ribbon, Air Force  Training  Ribbon,  National
Defense  Service  Medal,  Humanitarian  Service   Medal,   Air   Force
Outstanding Unit  Award  with  one  Oak  Leaf  Cluster,  Small  Expert
Marksmanship with one Bronze Service Star; Armed Forces Service Medal,
Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (UPHOLD DEMOCRACY).  Additionally the
DD Form 214 does not reflect any Foreign Service.

The applicant’s Enlisted  Performance  Report  (EPR)  for  the  period
closing 28 July 1996 indicates the applicant was chosen to participate
in Static displays at Wright Patterson AFB and Saudia Arabia.  The EPR
also indicated he maintained the highest standards  of professionalism
 while  deployed.  The EPR closing 4 May 1997 indicates he  diagnosed,
troubleshot, and repaired  critical  electronic  intelligence  systems
while deployed  overseas.   Also,  the  indorser  commented  that  the
applicant helped a flight crew with aircraft servicing while  deployed
to a base without RC-135 support.  There  are  no  further  references
regarding the duration of the aforementioned TDYs.

The applicant was released from active duty on 19 December 1997 with a
honorable discharge for miscellaneous/general reasons.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPAPP2 states  there  are  no  documents  in  the  applicant's
records  to  specify  his  stop  and  start  dates  to  the  Area   of
Responsibility (AOR).  AFPC/DPAPP2 on 20 February 2003  requested  the
applicant check his personal records and submit any  documentation  to
verify any TDY  to  the  AOR.   The  applicant  did  not  provide  the
requested information.  They recommend denying the requested relief.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the applicant did not respond to the  request  to
provide documentation to show he was TDY to the Persian  Gulf  for  30
consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days in direct support  of  Operation
SOUTHERN WATCH.  The copy of the certificate provided by the applicant
was locally produced and is not valid.  Without a copy of  TDY  orders
or Travel Vouchers,  the  applicant’s  eligibility  for  either  award
cannot be verified.  They recommend the applicant’s request be denied.

A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
30 May 2003, for review and response.  As of this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinions and the recommendations of the Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our  conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an  error  or  an  injustice.
The applicant's records do not reflect that he was  TDY  to  Southwest
Asia for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.  The applicant  was
requested to provide any documentation to support his claim;  however,
as of this date, he has not provided any documentation  to  verify  he
was assigned or TDY in Southwest Asia and  therefore  his  eligibility
for either award cannot be verified.  Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of  material error or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-00385 in Executive Session on 8 July 2003, under  the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mrs. Barbara A. Westgate, Chair
                 Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
                 Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 16 Apr 03, w/atch.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 19 May 03
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.




                                  BARBARA A. WESTGATE
                                  Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577

    Original file (BC-2003-02577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790

    Original file (BC-2002-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01598

    Original file (BC-2003-01598.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01598 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the Aerial Achievement Medal, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and the Enlisted Aircrew Badge. In...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01070

    Original file (BC-2003-01070.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP2 states that there are no documents in applicant’s Master Field Personnel Record that support his claim for service in Southwest Asia. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00163

    Original file (BC-2004-00163.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 Mar 04, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that his records did not indicate he was deployed to the Persian Gulf in direct support of Operation Southern Watch, and the locally-produced certificate for the AFEM was not a valid or official document. The applicant submitted a locally produced certificate for the AFEM in support of Operation Southern Watch for the period of 10 Jan 99-3 Mar 99. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0001810A

    Original file (0001810A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests additional credit for his foreign service and that he be awarded the following decorations: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Combat “V” Device, the Vietnam Service and Campaign...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102588

    Original file (0102588.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we believe it is reasonable to assume that the applicant did perform service in direct support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03062

    Original file (BC-2002-03062.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03062

    Original file (BC-2002-03062.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01458

    Original file (BC-2003-01458.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01458 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Michael C. Stevenson XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service time in the Philippines and Vietnam and he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) or Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and...