RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00222
INDEX CODE: 108.02
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: JOE GONZALES
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His disability rating be increased from 30% to 100%.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should be given an increase in his 30% disability rating to 100% because
he suffered a lacunar stroke while he was still serving on active duty.
In support of his application, he provides copies of medical records and a
copy of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) results. The applicant’s
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 21 July 1971, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the age
of 18 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of six years. He was
progressively promoted to the rank of staff sergeant (E-5) effective and
with a date of rank of 1 November 1976. The applicant was honorably
discharged on 20 July 1977 for completion of his term of service. On 21
July 1977, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve and served in enlisted
status until 21 June 1982. The applicant was tendered and accepted a
Reserve commission as a first lieutenant on 19 February 1987 and was
voluntarily ordered to extended active duty on 3 October 1988. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of major effective and with a date of
rank of 1 September 1994.
On 15 April 1999, the applicant was involved in a motor vehicle accident
and sustained a whiplash injury resulting in chronic pain of his neck and
upper back. Associated with his persistent myofascial pain (pain of the
soft tissues of the neck and upper back) he developed symptoms of
depression diagnosed as Major Depressive Disorder and it was indicated that
he was unable to perform his duties for over a year. The applicant was
referred for consideration by a medical evaluation board (MEB) on 8 June
2000 for major depression; moderate, degenerative disc disease C4-5-6-7;
and chronic myofascial pain syndrome. The MEB recommended that an Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) consider his case. The IPEB was convened
on 20 June 2000 and found the applicant was unfit due to “major depressive
disorder secondary to myofascial pain syndrome associated with degenerative
disc disease C4 through C7, definite social and industrial adaptability
impairment” and recommended his name be placed on the Temporary Disability
Retired List (TDRL) with a 30% disability rating. On 22 June 2000, the
applicant agreed with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB.
On 23 June 2000, the Secretary of the Air Force directed that the
applicant’s name be placed on the TDRL. Orders dated 5 July 2000 announced
the applicant’s relief from active duty on 2 October 2000 and his
retirement because of physical disability, effective 3 October 2000, at
which time, he would be credited with 18 years, 3 months and 16 days of
active duty service and 24 years, 6 months and 15 days of service for pay.
At the time the applicant’s retirement orders were published, a disability
retirement date calculator was accomplished with a workout date of 5 July
2000, calculating the applicant’s retirement date based on 20 days of
permissive TDY, 20 days for processing, 39 days of unsaleable leave and 10
additional days of leave accrued during this period.
On 14 July 2000, the applicant was hospitalized at a Naval Hospital for
right arm and leg weakness, difficulty holding a cup, and right foot
dragging. He was diagnosed with a small stroke (lacunar infarct) and was
discharged on 15 July 2000 with a stable physical examination.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) granted the applicant a temporary
disability rating of 100% pending evaluation effective 1 November 2000
because of the history of his stroke. On 13 December 2000, the applicant’s
DVA rating was reduced from 100% to a combined rating of 50% owing to a
change in his temporary rating for his stroke from 100% to 10%. The
13 December 2000 DVA rating decision reported the applicant’s neurological
exam showed normal motor and sensory exams, with intact strength and normal
gait.
The applicant underwent TDRL reevaluation in January 2002. After
considering the applicant’s medical records, including information
pertaining to the applicant’s treatment for the lacunar stroke, on
27 February 2002, the IPEB recommended the applicant be permanently retired
because of physical disability with a compensable rating of 30% for major
depressive disorder associated with myofascial pain. On 20 March 2002, the
applicant concurred with the findings of the IPEB. On 27 March 2002, the
Secretary of the Air Force directed that the applicant’s name be removed
from the TDRL and that he be permanently retired because of physical
disability. On 16 April 2002 the applicant’s name was removed from the
TDRL and he was retired in the grade of major with a compensable percentage
of 30%.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records
is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant
appears to have achieved total or near total recovery from his lacunar
stroke approximately one month after the event. Had he not been already
found unfit due to his depression and myofascial pain, it is very likely
that his lacunar infarct would not have been found unfitting since he
recovered almost completely. Because of his excellent recovery and his
years of service, an MEB purely for his stroke would have resulted in a
return to duty decision. It is the BCMR Medical Consultant’s opinion that
action and disposition in this case were proper and equitable reflecting
compliance with Air Force directives that implement the law. Details of
the BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation are at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states, after reviewing the
preponderance of evidence provided, they find no error or injustice
occurred during the applicant’s process through the disability evaluation
system (DES). It is DPPD’s opinion that the applicant was treated fairly
throughout the military DES process and that he was properly rated under
federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation as required by
federal law and policy. DPPD states they find no reasons why the
applicant’s record should be corrected to show an increase in his
disability rating in accordance with military disability laws and policy.
DPPD concurs with the BCMR Medical consultant’s assessment. The DPPD
evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 25 July 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we are not
persuaded that the compensable rating for his permanent retirement
because of physical disability in 2002 was improper or contrary to the
provisions of the governing regulations, which implement the law, or to
accepted medical principles. The applicant believes he is entitled to an
increase in his compensable rating because he suffered a stroke after he
had entered permissive TDY/leave status in anticipation of his October
2000 temporary retirement date. The evidence indicates he received
treatment and compensation for this condition by the VA and that he had
almost completely recovered by December 2000. At the time of his TDRL
reevaluation in 2002, the medical boards were well aware of the foregoing
facts in reaching their determinations concerning the permanent
disposition in this case and the applicant concurred with their
recommendations. In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence
that the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate
regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied,
we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the BCMR Medical
Consultant and the appropriate Air Force office and adopt their
conclusions as our findings in the case. Therefore, applicant's request
is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 1 October 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Frederick R. Beaman III, Panel Chair
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Member
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2003-00222:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Jan 03, with attachment.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dtd 23 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 17 Jul 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Jul 03.
FREDERICK R. BEAMAN III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01026
Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends the application be denied. Whereas the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02368
However, several disabling conditions were deleted, without explanation and if they had been properly considered by the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as required by law and regulation, he contends these additional unfitting conditions would have increased his total rating to be at least 30 percent and he would have been placed on the TDRL. The BCMR Medical Consultant concurs with the findings of the IPEB that the applicant’s conditions did not warrant a disability retirement or placement...
The applicant states that on 18 October 2001 she indicated her intent to submit an appeal to the Air Force Personnel Board (AFPB) via the formal board. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting her present request for further consideration by the AFPB while she is receiving her current 60% disability. THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ Vice Chair AFBCMR 01-03585 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00249
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00249 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating be changed to 100 percent rather than 40 percent. The Veterans’ Administration (VA) has rated his service- connected disability at 100 percent and permanently and totally disabled. DPPD’s complete evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03630
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed this application and recommended the applicant’s disability rating be increased to 80%. The Medical Consultant notes the applicant is left with residual deficits of severe loss of use of his left hand, right foot weakness requiring the use of a brace, and mild left leg weakness and associated spasticity limiting his ability to ambulate. They address the BCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00552
Both Boards recommended permanent retirement with a disability rating of 40 percent. DPPD therefore recommends his record be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability for fibromyalgia with a permanent disability rating of 60 percent. AFPC/DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for the applicant states while the BCMR Medical Consultant’s advisory...
They found him unfit for the rigors of military service and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 20% compensable disability rating. A copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant and counsel on 25 August 2000, for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). Accordingly, we recommend that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03487
The IPEB recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 20%; because of his unfitting, ratable, and compensable condition; in accordance with DoD and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01238
On 5 Feb 01, the Air Force PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with severance pay with a combined disability rating of 10 percent. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 03 for review and comment within 30 days. It is our opinion that because of the severity of his condition...