Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00206
Original file (BC-2003-00206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00206

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be reimbursed for Family  Servicemember’s  Group  Life  Insurance  (SGLI)
premiums he paid for the period of 1 November 2001 through 31 October 2002.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not elect SGLI for his spouse.

In support of his request, applicant provided copies of his LES, a  copy  of
SGLV 8286A, letter/fax from military records, and a personal letter.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the Air Force in the  grade
of master sergeant.

Documents provided by applicant indicate that on  1  November  2001,  Family
Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance  was  implemented.   Deductions  for
coverage under SGLI continued to be taken from  his  pay  until  31  October
2002.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPW recommended denial of the applicant’s request and  states  that  it
is their opinion that the Kunsan Air Base leadership took adequate steps  as
directed to inform all members of this new program and  that  the  applicant
had adequate time between         1 November 2001 and 31  December  2001  to
make an election decision. Additionally, the applicant did not  provide  any
documentation  to  indicate  he  was  not  aware  of  this  change  and  his
responsibility to make an election.  In  accordance  with  public  law,  the
applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,00 for the period 1 November 2001  -
31 October 2002.  Had the applicant’s spouse become a fatality  during  this
period, the proceeds of the $100,000 coverage would have been  paid  to  him
IAW 38 U.S.C. 1970.

AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 28 March 2003, for review and response.  As of  this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an  error  or  injustice.   After  a  thorough  review  of  the
evidence of record and applicant’s submission,  we  are  not  persuaded  the
applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums he paid  from  November
2001 to October 2002.  Applicant’s contentions are duly noted;  however,  we
do not find these assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently  persuasive
to override the rationale provided by the office of primary  responsibility.
 We therefore agree  with  their  recommendation  and  adopt  the  rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the  applicant  has  failed  to
sustain his burden of having suffered either an error or an  injustice.   In
view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the  contrary,  we  find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2003-00206
in Executive Session on 25 July 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Jackson Hauslein, Jr., Member
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:


      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Oct 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPW, dated 20 Mar 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.





      JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03773

    Original file (BC-2002-03773.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,00 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 November 2002. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums he paid from November 2001 to November 2002. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Mar 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03709

    Original file (BC-2002-03709.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Apparently, Mountain Home AFB had failed to enter a code in their records to show joint spouse and exemption from SGLI spouse coverage. There is no declination statement in the member’s record. No premiums were deducted from her pay until she arrived at Laughlin AFB in September 2002.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04061

    Original file (BC-2002-04061.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was never fixed up to present day and he has paid $420 into the SGLI, which he did not want. After receiving the applicant’s DD Form 149 dated 19 December 2002, they need additional information to sufficiently evaluate his claim and make an appropriate recommendation. They did not receive any response from the applicant.. AFPC/DPW complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01393

    Original file (BC-2003-01393.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family Coverage Election Certificate, declining coverage and any documentation to support her claim. Applicant did not respond or provide the additional information needed to sufficiently evaluate her claim. The HQ AFPC/DPW evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00665

    Original file (BC-2003-00665.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. The applicant married an active duty member of the Army on 2 August 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW recommends the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00548

    Original file (BC-2003-00548.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00548 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums paid on her Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) as of 1 November 2001. DPW requested the applicant provide a copy of her SGLV 8286A, Family...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00116

    Original file (BC-2003-00116.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 April 2003, for review and comment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums she paid from November 2001 to December 2002. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00229

    Original file (BC-2003-00229.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00106

    Original file (BC-2003-00106.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for Family Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums he paid for the period of 1 August 2002 through 31 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00230

    Original file (BC-2003-00230.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage prior to 31 December 2001. In accordance with public law, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 through 31 July 2002. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be...