Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00083
Original file (BC-2003-00083.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00083
                       INDEX CODE:  107.00
      APPLICANT  COUNSEL:  Connecticut Department
                                     of Veterans Affairs

      SSN        HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded  the  Good  Conduct
Medal (GCM),  Armed  Forces  Expeditionary  Medal  (AFEM),  Air  Force
Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and the
Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is entitled to these awards because of the informal nature of  duty
in the Congo-covert action.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant served on  active duty from 18  March  1959  through  18
June 1963.  His records reflect he had an overseas  tour  in  England.
The applicant had a permanent change of station (PCS) to  Leopoldville
in the Congo from 8 August 1961 through 11 June 1962.  His DD Form 214
reflects he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal.  A  DD  Form  215  was
issued on 29 May 2003, to reflect the award of  the  National  Defense
Service Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPPRA  states  that  on  4  March  2003,  they  informed  the
applicant that his DD Form 214 already reflected  award  of  the  Good
Conduct Medal.  They further informed him  that  he  was  entitled  to
receive the National Defense Service Medal.  He was also informed that
he did not meet the criteria to be awarded the AFEM and that Air Force
Overseas (Long/Short) Tour  Ribbons  were  not  established  until  12
October 1980, and since he was not on
active duty after this period he is not eligible  for  these  ribbons.
In regard to the applicant’s request for the AFAM and AFCM,  there  is
no indication in his records that he was recommended for these awards,
nor  did  he  provide  documentation  in  support  of   his   request.
AFPC/DPPPRA requested he withdraw his application.  The applicant  did
not respond.  They recommend his request for award of  the  AFEM,  Air
Force Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, AFCM, and AFAM be denied.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4
June 2003, for review and response.  As of this date, no response  has
been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure of timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the  basis  for  our  decision  that  the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden that he has suffered either
an error or an injustice.  It is noted  that  the  applicant’s  record
reflects that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal and the Air  Force
has awarded him the National Defense Service Medal.  The applicant has
not provided  any  persuasive  evidence  in  support  of  his  request
establishing his entitlement to the remaining awards.   Therefore,  in
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-00083 in Executive Session on 22 July 2003, under the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Carolyn B. Willis, Member
                       Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Dec 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPR, dated 27 May 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 03.




                             GREGORY H. PETKOFF
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00869

    Original file (BC-2003-00869.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00869 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the Air Force Training Ribbon, the NCO PME Graduate Ribbon, the Air Force Overseas (Long/Short) Tour Ribbon, the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00668

    Original file (BC-2003-00668.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes the squadron commander did not request a change of the closeout date of the decoration until 9 Jul 01, and the applicant applied for supplemental promotion consideration on 27 Aug 01, after the closeout date was changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB asserts there is no conclusive evidence the amended/resubmitted decoration was placed into official...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017

    Original file (BC-2006-02017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01576

    Original file (BC-2002-01576.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be upgraded to a Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for action performed on 13 November 1982. b. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 October 1984, he was awarded an Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for Heroism for his actions on 13 November 1982. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00454

    Original file (BC-2003-00454.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, he did receive an Article 15 in 1963 while at --- AFB -- for insubordination. In regard to the applicant’s request that he be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Presidential Unit Citation and the Combat Readiness Medal, we note that on 1 July 2003, he was advised by the Air Force Personnel Center that a correction to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, was accomplished to reflect the award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00718

    Original file (BC-2005-00718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00718 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he received the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). He was released from active duty on 22 April 1956 and transferred to the Air Force Reserves where he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01023

    Original file (BC-2003-01023.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01023 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected to reflect his foreign service, his training as an Alarm Response Team (ART) Leader, his award of the Marksmanship Badge and other awards. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01321

    Original file (BC-2003-01321.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01321 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 241 be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for the period 25 June 1990 to 29 March 1992. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00294

    Original file (BC-2004-00294.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this case, the applicant did not provide any documentation demonstrating that he exercised due diligence in ensuring these missing citations were filed in his OSR prior to convening of the CY02B board. Since it is the officer’s responsibility to ensure the accuracy of his record, they believe that had he checked his OSR prior to the CY99A and CY02B CSBs he would have noticed the missing citations and taken timely corrective action. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01799

    Original file (BC-2006-01799.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis...