RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00718
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect he received the Meritorious
Service Medal (MSM).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His final DD Form 214 did not reflect award of the MSM. He believes
he should receive the award based on his honorable years of service.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 23 April 1952, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force
(RegAF). He was released from active duty on 22 April 1956 and
transferred to the Air Force Reserves where he served until 22 April
1960, as which time, he was honorably discharged at the expiration of
his term of service. He enlisted in the Air Force Reserves on 6 April
1961 and served continuously until 30 March 1967, at which time he was
honorably discharged and reenlisted on 31 March 1967. He was ordered
to extended active duty on 24 July 1970. On 23 April 1972, he was
honorably discharged and enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 April
1972 where he continuously served until his 1 February 1990
retirement, in the grade of master sergeant. He served 25 years,
7 months and 28 days of active service.
The applicant’s records reflect he was awarded the Air Medal (AM), Air
Force Commendation (AFCM) with two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (OLCs),
Army Commendation Medal, Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM), Smalls
Arms Expert Rifle, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM),
Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Military Education Graduate
Ribbon; Air Reserve Forces Meritorious Service Ribbon, Army Good
Conduct Medal, Combat Readiness Medal with one Silver and one Bronze
OLC, Korean Service Medal (KSM), Air Force Longevity Service Award
Ribbon with one Silver OLC, National Defense Service (NDSM), Air Force
Overseas Long Tour Ribbon, Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon; Air
Force Training Ribbon, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one Silver and
two Bronze Service Stars, Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with two
Bronze OLCs, United Nations Service Medal, Air Force Good Conduct
Medal with one Silver and one Bronze OLC.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPPR states the MSM is awarded for outstanding noncombat
meritorious achievement or service to the United States; normally, the
acts or service rendered must be comparable to that required for the
Legion of Merit (LOM), but in a duty of a lesser though considerable
responsibility. The LOM is awarded for exceptionally meritorious
conduct in the performance of outstanding service to the U.S. In
peacetime, award to U.S. military personnel is limited to service in
an extremely difficult duty that is performed in a clearly exceptional
manner, if such service is of marked national or international
significance to the Air Force or the DoD.
While on active duty, the applicant received three AFCMs - one for
outstanding achievement and two for meritorious service. He did not
receive a decoration when he retired.
HQ AFPC/DPPPR further states individuals cannot recommend themselves
for a decoration. Furthermore, decorations are not automatically
awarded at the end of a tour, it is the supervisor’s decision as to
whether or not an individual will be recommended for a decoration.
The applicant has not provided a copy of a recommendation package
showing that a recommendation for a decoration was placed into
official channels. The applicant has not provided any documentation
indicating he applied to his chain of command regarding any decoration
for any assignment while on active duty; nor has he provided any
justification for not having requested consideration while on active
duty. The applicant has not provided any documentation regarding a
recommendation package for any decoration for his service or
achievements while on active duty. Without any official documentation
or statements from his chain of command, his entitlement of any
additional decorations cannot be verified. Therefore, based on the
information provided and the applicant’s personnel records AFPC/DPPPR
recommends the requested relief be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1
April 2005, for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air
Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. The
applicant believes he earned the MSM because of his years of service
and his records should reflect receipt of the award, presumably at the
time of his retirement. However, as noted by the Air Force, in order
for a servicemember to receive the MSM, they must be recommended by
their commander. However, we find no evidence in the applicant's
records indicating that his commander recommended him for the MSM.
Nor has the applicant provided any documentation showing he applied to
his chain of command regarding the decoration while on active duty, or
an explanation as to why he did not request consideration for the
decoration while on active duty. His DD Form 214 clearly reflects his
many accomplishments and awards and for this this he is to be
commended. Nonetheless, without official documentation or statements
from his chain of command, his eligibility for an MSM cannot be
verified. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-00718 in Executive Session on 19 May 2005, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
Ms. Marcia Jane Bachman, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 22 Mar 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 05.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017
Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01576
His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be upgraded to a Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for action performed on 13 November 1982. b. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 October 1984, he was awarded an Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for Heroism for his actions on 13 November 1982. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00186
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00186 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM), Third Oak Leaf Cluster (3OLC), for the period 3 August 1997 to 27 February 2001, be upgraded to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and he be considered for promotion to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01587
Everyone received a medal but him. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Additionally, the applicant cannot recommend himself for entitlement to a decoration.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03480
In January 1973, he was thoroughly evaluated by Orthopedic Services with negative results. On 20 January 2004, the Air Force office of primary responsibility requested the applicant provide a more detailed account of the circumstances regarding the injuries he received in Vietnam on 10 January 1969. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states the PH is awarded for injuries or wounds incurred as a direct result of enemy action;...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01363
Furthermore, the applicant has not provided any evidence to reflect a second JMUA was awarded. However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s records indicating she served in another unit that was awarded the JMUA; nor has the applicant provided any documentation substantiating she was awarded a second JMUA. However, should the applicant provide documentation substantiating she was assigned to another unit receiving the JMUA, this Board would be willing to review the materials for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect award of the BSM. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR on 17 June 2003 informed the applicant that his records did not indicate he was recommended for or was awarded the medal. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 May 03, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03365
Since the 7th and 13th Air Forces’ Decoration Review Boards reviewed all decorations at that time, they were in the best position to determine which recommendations for the BSM should be awarded and which should be downgraded to the AFCM in order to provide consistency in decorations. DPPPR concluded by stating that the applicant has not made any effort for almost 30 years to have his AFCM (1OLC) upgraded; has not provided any documents showing he submitted a request for upgrade through...
Her request for senior rater endorsement on the EPR should not be granted at this time. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provides the wing commander’s concurrence of her request for senior rater indorsement. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant amending the MSM citation to include...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00519
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00519 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM, 1 OLC), he was awarded for the period 6 July 2000 to 20 October 2001, be upgraded to the Meritorious Service Medal. Despite the fact the erroneous...