RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03891
INDEX NUMBER: 112.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The extension of her enlistment she entered into on 13 Dec 01 be
corrected to reflect inclusive dates of 5 Jul 04 to 4 Jan 05.
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She thought that she was entering into an extension of only six months,
the amount of time required for her to accept a new assignment, but later
discovered during a review of her records that she had been extended for
18 months.
She was unsuccessful in her attempts to either shorten or cancel the
erroneous extension.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
______________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 5 Jul 00 for a period of four
years. On 13 Dec 01, she entered into an 18 month extension in order to
qualify for a permanent change of station (PCS) assignment of 36 months
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The applicant
signed the form requesting 18 months of retainability. The form states
in 3 places that she was extending for 18 months.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
______________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17
Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03891 in
Executive Session on 6 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 3 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 17 Jan 03.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00822 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be released from his three-month extension of service, and his original date of separation of 8 Sep 02 be reinstated. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect that he extended his enlistment for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02986 INDEX NUMBER: 112.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The period of lost time, 14 Sep 01 through 2 Nov 01 reflected on her DD Form 214 be removed. Her commander at the time she separated from service indicated on an AF Form 2098 that the period from 14 Sep 01...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01295
Her original reporting date was 31 Dec 01 which required a DOS of 16 Jan 04. PCS retainability requirements are determined by the assignment RNLTD. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02955 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment on 14 Jan 02 be changed to 17 Jan 02. The window to get the SRB recomputed was if the member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02 and had a DOS of 17 Jan 02 or later. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02327
His sentence was reduced to reduction to the grade of airman (E-2), three months confinement, and forfeiture of $400.00 per month for three months. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03679
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We note that, since the applicant was not in a required 5-skill level...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00850
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of E-3, with an effective date and date of rank (DOR) of 19 Apr 01. Air Force Instruction 36-2604, Service Dates and Date of Rank, stipulates that “Airmen in the following categories receive a DOR equal to the date of enlistment in the RegAF: Non-prior service enlistees (members who have served less than 24 months total active federal military service) or...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states the RE code the applicant received is the appropriate code for those members separated "involuntarily with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation without characterization of service (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 May 2002, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00735
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating in part, according to the extension in her unit personnel record group (UPRG), applicant’s DOS was out to Dec 02 and she was obligated to serve that entire time. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and indicated that there was no documentation on file in the master personnel...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...