RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02327
INDEX NUMBER: 110.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None
XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “4E” be changed to one that
does not require a waiver for him to reenter the Air Force.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In support of his appeal, applicant attaches a copy of his DD Form 214
and a copy of his last reenlistment contract.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 19 Nov 92. On 16 Nov 95,
the applicant was tried by special court-martial for attempting to
wrongfully possess Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD). The applicant was
found guilty and sentenced to reduction to the grade of airman basic (E-
1), forfeiture of $500.00 per month for four months, and confinement
for four months. His sentence was reduced to reduction to the grade of
airman (E-2), three months confinement, and forfeiture of $400.00 per
month for three months. The applicant was promoted to airman first
class (A1C) on 16 Oct 96. The applicant was discharged on 7 Feb 97
after three years, eleven months of credible service with an honorable
discharge. The applicant was given an RE code of “4E” based on having
completed more than 31 months of service and having a grade of A1C or
lower.
A resume of his enlisted performance reports (EPRs) follows:
Closeout Date Overall Rating
28 Feb 95 4
*28 Feb 96 3
13 Oct 96 5
* Referral EPR
Additional information pertinent to this application is contained in
the evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force
found at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his
RE code. Based on documents available in the applicant’s records, the
RE code the applicant received is correct.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10
Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has
not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we
agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02327 in
Executive Session on 4 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 27 Dec 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 03.
JOSEPH A. ROJ
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02803
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-02803 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “4E” (Grade is airman first class (A1C) or below and airman completed 31 or more months, if a first-term airman) be changed to one that will allow enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG)....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03359
On 13 Dec 93, while in the grade of airman, the applicant was punished under Article 15, UCMJ, by his squadron commander for providing an alcoholic beverage to a person under 21 years of age in violation of local state law. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded to the Air Force evaluation and indicated that he believes it would be an unjust ruling to deny his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-00158
However, on 16 May 05, HQ AFPC/DPPAE advised the applicant that his 2H RE code was erroneous and had been administratively changed to 4E (grade is airman, airman basic, or A1C and the member has completed more than 31 months of service) - See Exhibit C. [Note: The 4E RE code is a waiverable code; i.e., if a member has an in-demand skill and is otherwise eligible, the Reserves may waive the immediate reenlistment impediment and accept him.] ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03426
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03426 INDEX CODE: 112.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4E be changed to a code that will enable him to reenlist and that his grade of senior airman (SrA/E-4) be reinstated. The applicant’s assigned RE code of 4E accurately reflects that he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01763
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01763 INDEX CODES: 100.06, 131.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank be changed from airman basic to airman first class. The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. The evidence of record reflects that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01255 INDEX CODE: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 OCT 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4E (Grade is A1C or below and the airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for six-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02137
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03 for review and response. No evidence has been provided which would lead us to believe that the applicant’s evaluators were unable to render an unbiased evaluation of his performance or that the ratings on the contested report were based on...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00438
The following information was obtained from the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) Hearing Record. On 17 Nov 00, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for a change to the reason and authority for the discharge. After careful review of the available records and the information contained in the Air Force Discharge Review Board Hearing Record, the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-04028 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 4E to 1J. We agree with the opinion of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the RE code which was assigned at the time of his separation accurately reflects the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02610
He was assigned an separation program designator (SPD) code of KBK and an RE code of 2G (Participating in Track 4 or 5 of the Substance Abuse Reorientation and Treatment (SART) program for drugs, or has failed to complete Track 4). In AFPC/DPPAE’s view, the applicant’s RE code correctly reflects his failure in the ADAPT program. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit I.