RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03526
INDEX CODE: 107.00, 100.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM).
One of the applicant’s initial requests was for his DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to be amended to
reflect the accurate Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC), 2W131E, Aircraft
Armament Systems, Apprentice, F-15, he performed in while on active duty.
This request has been administratively corrected. Therefore no action by
this Board is required.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes that he should be awarded the NDSM based on his Delayed Entry
Program (DEP) date, rather than the date he entered active duty.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214
(Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a copy of his
Certificate of Training, dated 3 April 1997.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 January 1996 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years.
According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, Item 13, he received the Air
Force Training Ribbon.
The National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) was awarded for the periods 2
August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September 2001 through a date
to be determined.
On 4 August 1997 the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of
airman first class, under the provisions of AFI 36-3212 (Disability,
Severance Pay). He served a total of 1 year, 6 months, and 11 days of
total active military service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial. They indicated that on 22 November 2002,
they informed the applicant that the NDSM was only awarded for active
service and he was asked to withdraw his application. He did not respond.
The enlistment into the DEP does not constitute active service. The
applicant is not eligible for any additional awards or decorations.
The evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAC indicated that a review of the documents provided by the
applicant substantiates his claim that item 11 does not accurately reflect
the AFSC in which he performed while on active duty. The documents
indicate that he completed course J3ABR2W131E-003, Apprentice Aircraft
Armament Systems Specialist Course (F-15) PDS Code 279, 3 April 1997. The
82nd TRW/TOR, Sheppard, TX, verified course completion. AFMAN 36-2108,
Enlisted Classification, 30 April 1996, reflects the mandatory training for
award of AFSC 2W131E as completion of a suffix specific basic aircraft
armament systems course. Applicant completed this requirement.
Applicant’s personnel records also reflect that the period of service for
AFSC 2W131 differs from the period indicated in item 11 of the applicant’s
DD Form 214. Based on their review, the applicant’s AFSC data, item 11,
DD Form, 214, should be corrected to read: 2W131E - Aircraft Armament
Systems, Apprentice, F-15, 8 months.
On 3 March 2003, AFPC/DPPRSP advised the applicant his records had been
corrected to reflect the correct AFSC and he was provided a new DD Form
214.
The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 14 March 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice warranting award of the National
Defense Service Medal (NDM). The applicant contends that he should be
awarded the NDSM based on his Delayed Entry Program (DEP) date, rather than
the date he entered active duty. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been
the victim of an error or injustice. The applicant was on active duty from
24 January 1996 through 4 August 1997. The two periods in which the NDSM
was awarded were 2 August 1990 through 30 November 1995 and 11 September
2001 through a date to be determined and time spent in the DEP is not
considered active duty. Since the applicant was not on active duty during
the periods for which the NDSM was awarded, he is not eligible for this
award. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 17 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Albert F. Lowas, Jr., Panel Chair
Mr. Robert H. Altman, Member
Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2002-03526 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 October 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 4 February 2003, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAC, dated 14 February 2003,
w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 March 2003.
ALBERT F. LOWAS, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03764
DPPPR states that in accordance with DoD 1348.33-Manual, Chapter 4, “the JMUA, awarded in the name of the Secretary of Defense, is intended to recognize joint units and activities for meritorious achievement or service, superior to that which is normally, expected.” After consultation with the Joint Staff and researching DOD 1348.33-M Appendix C, DoD Activities Awarded the JMUA; and the Air Force Unit Awards Database their office located 2 awards of the JMUA to AFELM NATO AWACS E-3A for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03640
The DPPAC evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30 days. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAC, dated 13 Dec 02, w/atch.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00156
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-00156 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 11, Primary Specialty, be corrected to read “A11450 (Aircrew, Aircraft Loadmaster) and 47251C (Special Vehicle Mechanic, Materials...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01959
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01959 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 DECEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A771, Aircraft...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00615
His records be corrected to reflect award of the Special Experience Identifier (SEI) for Stinger Missiles to Security Police Personnel, and the United States Air Force (USAF) Missile Badge. They indicated that the applicant was not eligible for any Navy marksmanship awards, as he was not on active duty with the Navy; he was in the Air Force. Since the applicant was on active duty in the Air Force, he would not be authorized to wear another service’s devices on awards earned while in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01576
On 15 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that they verified his entitlement to the JSAM; however, he did not provide any documentation to substantiate his claim for the SAEMR. On 15 August 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant that he did not provide documentation to substantiate his claim that he is entitled to the SAEMR. There is no documentation in the applicant’s records to substantiate that he was awarded a PAFSC of 3P051.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04047 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant did not perform any duties in AFSC 3A051. After a thorough review of the applicant’s records and the evidence provided it appears the applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,...
In a legal review of the discharge case file, the wing deputy staff judge advocate, found it legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an entry-level separation. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant responded and submits three letters of reference and again states his desire to reenlist in the Air Force. Our finding in this regard is based on the fact that,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02532
If applicant is reawarded 3P0X1 as a secondary AFSC, he would receive supplemental promotion consideration in the 9A000 AFSC (retraining or pending retraining) beginning with cycle 03E5. Applicant requests his 3P051 AFSC be reinstated as a secondary AFSC and that his promotion to the rank of staff sergeant (SSgt) be effective the date of the 03E5 promotion cycle. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...