Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03524
Original file (BC-2002-03524.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03524

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NONE

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

All medals associated with Desert Shield and Desert Storm be  added  to  his
DD Form 214.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During Operation Desert Storm,  he  received  orders  to  fly  to  Saudi  to
deliver a replacement engine for  one  of  their  planes.   They  were  also
scheduled for multiple air refueling missions  with  many  fighter  aircraft
that they were bringing over.  They landed at Diego Garcia  to  refuel,  get
in the required crew rest and flew out the  following  day  for  Saudi.   We
landed at King Kalid International Airport (KKIA)  (during  a  SCUD  missile
attack, so he is certain that it was during  Desert  Storm  and  not  Desert
Shield).  His unit was assigned to an old AT&T building that they took  over
just outside of KKIA.  He has forgotten how long  they  were  there  but  he
knows that they were definitely there for a 24-hour period.

He cannot remember the other crew members  that  he  flew  with  but  he  is
almost certain that their Squadron Commander Col F__ flew over with them  as
an Instructor Pilot.

In support of his request, he provided a copy of his  Community  College  of
the Air Force Transcript and a personal statement.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26  July  1989.   He  was
voluntarily separated for miscellaneous reasons from  the  Air  Force  on  7
December 1992,  under  the  provisions  of  AFR  39-10,  with  an  honorable
discharge.  He had served 3 years, 4 months, and 12  days  of  total  active
military service.

Applicant was assigned to the ---th Air Refueling Heavy Squadron at ---  AFB
NY.  His DD Form 24 reflects award of the Air Force Good Conduct  Medal  and
the National Defense Service Medal.  This  is  no  annotation  that  he  was
deployed to the Persian Gulf for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP2 recommends denial and states that there are no documents in  the
applicant’s records that show actual arrival and  departure  dates  for  any
TDY to any  overseas  location.   The  applicant  was  asked  to  check  his
personal files for any additional documents they could use  to  support  his
claim.  He did not respond to their request.

AFPC/DPAPP2 complete evaluation is at Exhibit C

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial and states that the applicant has not  provided
any documentation to substantiate his claims regarding awards, and there  is
no documentation in his records  to  substantiate  his  claims.   Without  a
legible copy of official documentation, they cannot verify  the  applicant’s
eligibility for any additional awards.  His unit did not earn the Air  Force
Outstanding Unit Award.

AFPC/DPPPR complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Complete  copies  of  the  Air  Force  evaluations  were  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 11 April 2003 for review and response within 30  days.   As  of
this date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After reviewing the evidence of record  we
are not persuaded  the  applicant  has  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  There is no indication in the applicant’s records  showing  that
he served on temporary duty for 30 consecutive  days  or  60  nonconsecutive
days in direct support of Operation  DESERT  SHIELD/DESERT  STORM.   In  the
absence  of  evidence  showing  the  applicant’s  service  meets  the  cited
criteria for award of  the  any  medals  associated  with  Operation  DESERT
SHIELD/DESERT STORM, we agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis  for  our  conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2002-03524
in Executive Session on 17 June 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
      Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
      Ms. Martha Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP2, dated 4 Feb 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 3 Apr 03
    Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 03.




                                   ROBERT S. BOYD
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00271

    Original file (BC-2003-00271.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00271 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) and/or the Kuwait Liberation Medal. Although the LANTIRN system is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02010

    Original file (BC-2004-02010.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02010 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). In addition, the servicemember must be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03939

    Original file (BC-2002-03939.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03357 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She should have been awarded the SWASM after she served in Saudi Arabia during Desert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02619

    Original file (BC-2006-02619.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. Although his performance reports list several deployments, none state that he served in the AOE and the statement contained on his DD Form 214 stating he served in support of ODS/S, is the standard statement contained on all members discharge certificates who served during ODS/S. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01377

    Original file (BC-2011-01377.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    To be eligible, a service member must be: 1) attached to or regularly serving for one of more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore (military) operations, 2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a navy vessel directly supporting military operations, 3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas of responsibility, 4) serving on temporary duty (TDY) for 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0102588

    Original file (0102588.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Other relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we believe it is reasonable to assume that the applicant did perform service in direct support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | Bc-2006-03893

    Original file (Bc-2006-03893.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits excerpts from his military personnel records, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and a copy of the criteria for the SWASM, KLM-SA, and KLS-K medals. DPPPR states after a thorough review of applicant’s military record and resources available, they were unable to verify applicant was in the area of eligibility in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. He provided an enlisted Performance Report...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02015

    Original file (BC-2003-02015.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the DFC and additional campaign credit for the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal be denied. DPPPR recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request for award of the DFC for actions on 10 October 1944; additional campaign credit for the Asiatic- Pacific Campaign Medal; and, award of the Air Medal with fourth oak leaf cluster for the period 23...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790

    Original file (BC-2002-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02577

    Original file (BC-2003-02577.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it is noted the EPR for the period ending 3 June 1996 indicates he was deployed during Operation Southern Watch, for which the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal was awarded, we believe that based on the time period he was deployed, it would appear he was deployed initially in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm thereby making him eligible for the SWASM. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...