Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03040
Original file (BC-2002-03040.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03040

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  Servicemembers’  Group   Life   Insurance   (SGLI)   and   Family
Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance  (FSGLI)  elections  for  "No"
coverage, be honored and he be reimbursed  for  the  monthly  premiums
deducted from his July 2001 through October  2002  pay  for  SGLI  and
FSGLI coverage.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 19 May 2001, he left the active duty Air Force and entered the  IMA
reserve program.  Upon entering the IMA status, he tried to find about
the SGLI program.  In between  that  time,  he  did  not  receive  any
correspondence from the military.  He just received  his  first  leave
and earning statement (LES) since leaving active duty  and  it  had  a
deduction of $240 and a debt payment of $99.  He has mailed the  forms
to stop SGLI and was told to file a claim  with  this  office  to  get
reimbursed for the insurance coverage that he did not know he had.  He
dropped SGLI about 1997.

Applicant’s complete is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was discharged from active duty on 19 May  2001  in  the
grade of senior airman.  Applicant entered the Individual Mobilization
Augmentee (IMA) Reserve Program in 20 May 2001.

Applicant paid SGLI premiums from 1 July 2001 to 1  October  2002.  He
withdrew from SGLI on 31 October 2002.

_________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPS recommended denial since the change to  the  SGLI  and  FSGLI
programs were extensively advertised.

ARPC/DPS complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant on 22 Nov 02, for review and comment.  As of this  date,  no
response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice.  After a  thorough  review  of
the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant’s  submission,  we  are  not
persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the SGLI premiums  he
paid from July 2001 to October 2002.  Under the provisions  of  Public
Law  106-419,  every  eligible  member  of  the   Armed   Forces   was
automatically  covered,  regardless  of  any  prior   election.    The
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we do not find  these
assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to  override
the rationale provided by the office of  primary  responsibility.   We
therefore agree with their  recommendation  and  adopt  the  rationale
expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed
to sustain his burden  of  having  suffered  either  an  error  or  an
injustice.  In view of the above and absent persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  02-03040
in Executive Session on 15 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                 Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
                 Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:


      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Sep 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPW, dated 15 Nov 02.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Nov 02.





      JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03036

    Original file (BC-2002-03036.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03036 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00442

    Original file (BC-2003-00442.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She filed another declination form effective 15 January 2003. She finds it incredible that anyone, including the government, would take out a life insurance policy on her and her family without her knowledge or consent and then expect her to pay the expense. The ARPC website also had information about the change, with instructions regarding what to do if the member wanted to decrease coverage or wished to decline.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03546

    Original file (BC-2002-03546.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic unless the member declined the coverage. On 31 October 2002, the applicant completed an SGLV 8286A, electing to decline FSGLI coverage for her spouse. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02897

    Original file (BC-2002-02897.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied, and states in part, that there is no evidence that an injustice occurred. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02897...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03371

    Original file (BC-2002-03371.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPS states the applicant alleges she declined SGLI coverage in March 2000 and again in April 2002, however, since the law was not effective until 1 November 2001, her March 2000 declination was not applicable and she needed to decline the coverage again on 1 November 2001 to ensure that she had not incurred a debt. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03584

    Original file (BC-2002-03584.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14, established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the applicant’s June 2001...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00830

    Original file (BC-2003-00830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. His MPF could not find a copy of his letter declining coverage. HQ ARPC extensively advertised the change to the program, including an article in the Air Reserve Personnel Update, and the notifications sent to the applicant’s address contained information regarding the FSGLI changes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03610

    Original file (BC-2002-03610.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was attending basic military training at the time declination of FSGLI needed to be accomplished and had no way of knowing about the new insurance coverage or the accruing debt. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. DPS states that the applicant completed the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) election statement declining coverage on 4 Sep 02, which became effective 1 Oct 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00351

    Original file (BC-2003-00351.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his application, the applicant submits a personal statement; a copy of his Family Coverage Election form, dated 19 October 2002; and a copy of his leave and earnings statement, dated 22 January 2003. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. DPS states the applicant was sent a letter to his home address in New Orleans explaining the new FSGLI coverage.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200107

    Original file (0200107.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00107 INDEX CODE 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) election for “NO” coverage, dated 10 February 1999, be honored and he be reimbursed for the monthly premiums deducted from his pay for SGLI coverage of $250,000 since 1 April 2001. The...