Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01355
Original file (BC-2004-01355.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01355
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Action Ribbon.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was a Crash Rescue Survival Expert (Airborne Ready).

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  provided  a  copy  of  his
separation document.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 May 64 for a  period
of four years.  He was honorably released from active duty on  11  Apr
68.  He was credited with 3 years, 10 months, and  22 days  of  active
service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommended denial  noting  the  Combat  Action  Ribbon  is
authorized by the Secretary of the Navy, and awarded to members of the
Navy, the Marine Corps,  and  the  Coast  Guard  operating  under  the
control of the Navy, in the  pay  grade  of  0-6  or  below,  who  had
actively participated in  ground  or  surface  combat.   According  to
AFPC/DPPPR, the applicant is not eligible  for  this  award  since  he
served in the Air Force and does not meet the criteria for the award.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 4 Jun
04 for review and response.  As of this date,  no  response  has  been
received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt  their  rationale  as
the basis for our decision the applicant has  failed  to  sustain  his
burden that he has suffered either  an  error  or  an  injustice.   No
evidence has been  presented  which  would  lead  us  to  believe  the
applicant met the established criteria for award of the Combat  Action
Ribbon.  In view of the  above,  and  in  the  absence  of  sufficient
evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 4 Aug 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph A. Roj, Panel Chair
      Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
      Mr. Clarence D. Long III, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket  Number
BC-2004-01355 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Apr 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 27 May 04, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 04.




                                   JOSEPH A. ROJ
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00039

    Original file (BC-2003-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He did receive the National Defense Service Medal for serving on active duty during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 April 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01386

    Original file (BC-2002-01386.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Item 27, Remarks, reflects he completed the Non-commissioned Officer Orientation Course in April 1978. They find that the applicant’s records reflect no indication the applicant performed any duties, assigned or attached, with the OSI or EOD. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterated his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103591

    Original file (0103591.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s available military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. His Individual Flight Records show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101027

    Original file (0101027.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01027 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) medal. He was awarded the PH by a general officer while he was in the hospital. He recently received a formal letter of presentation from the President of Korea which included the new ribbon and medal.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01534

    Original file (BC-2003-01534.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    None of the applicant’s Air Medals were awarded for a specified number of combat flight missions; they were awarded by the 15th Air Force for specific dates as follows: - Basic Air Medal (AM), awarded for the period 17 August-3 September 1944, by General Order (GO) 2789, dated 3 October 1944. Even though the applicant has not substantiated that he was ever recommended for award of the Fifth and Sixth Oak Leaf Clusters to the Air Medal, after a thorough review of his submission, the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02763

    Original file (BC-2002-02763.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02763 INDEX CODE: 107.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) instead of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial stating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03635

    Original file (BC-2003-03635.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states the PH is awarded for injuries or wounds incurred as a direct result of enemy action; specific details must be provided, as well as documentation showing the wound or injury received medical treatment. The eyewitness statements the applicant provided do not provide adequate corroboration of the details of the applicant’s injury or the location of the injury. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03542

    Original file (BC-2004-03542.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR indicated that after a complete review of the documentation provided by the applicant, they were unable to find any evidence of a recommendation from the applicant’s chain of command. The Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF) has designated the Commander, USCENTAF (COMUSCENTAF) as the approval authority for all Air Force decorations based solely upon service, performance, or achievements...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00675

    Original file (BC-2004-00675.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00675 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 May 1955, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the grade of airman...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03191

    Original file (BC-2003-03191.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the applicant was discharged on 6 November 1945, he is not eligible for the CAR. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant and his counsel on 6 February 2004 for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...