Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0203480
Original file (0203480.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-03480
            INDEX CODE:  135.02
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Five days of satisfactory service be granted to give him 20 years  of  total
satisfactory service or he be awarded two (2) Inactive Duty  Training  (IDT)
points for Retirement/Retention (R/R) year ending 25 August  1987  and  that
he be made eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60.

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He would like to meet the eligibility criteria for retired pay  at  age  60.
On 22 November 2002, he will be 60 years of age.  It would be  in  his  best
interest if this Board considers him eligible after  20  years  of  faithful
service.

In support of his application, he provides  documents  associated  with  his
Army Reserve and Air National Guard participation, and  copies  of  the  Air
Reserve  Personnel  Center  Fact  Sheet  regarding  the   Retired   Reserve,
Retirement Benefits and his Point Credit Summaries  for  Guard  and  Reserve
service.  His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

__________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 29 April 1988, the applicant was discharged from the Air  National  Guard
and as a Reserve of the Air Force.   Applicant’s  NGB  Form  22,  Report  of
Separation and Record of Service, indicates the  reason  for  his  discharge
was under the provisions of ANGR 39-10,  paragraph  3-20,  “Resign  for  Own
Convenience.”  He was credited with 23 years, 4 months and 4 days  of  total
service for pay.  As of the Reserve Year Ending (RYE) 29 April 1988, he  was
credited with 19 years, 11  months  and  20  days  of  satisfactory  Federal
service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
__________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

APRC/DPP  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   DPP  states  that  the
applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service as  required  by
Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731; therefore, he is not eligible  for  Reserve
retired pay at age 60.  He had  the  opportunity  to  complete  his  service
before he requested discharge since he could have stayed in a  participating
status  until  4  May  1989,  his  expiration  term  of  service.   ARPC/DPP
evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

__________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  17
January 2003 for review and response within 30 days.  As of this date,  this
office has received no response (See Exhibit C).

__________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the  evidence
presented, we are not persuaded that  the  favorable  consideration  of  the
applicant’s request is appropriate.   The  applicant’s  performance  history
indicates that as a  member  of  the  Air  National  Guard  since  1976,  he
consistently met the required training points necessary for  a  satisfactory
year.  We believe he should have been familiar with the guidelines  required
for eligibility for Reserve retired pay  at  age  60.   We  find  it  a  bit
perplexing, however,  that  the  applicant  chose  to  resign  for  his  own
convenience prior to establishing eligibility for Reserve  retired  pay  and
offers no explanation as to why he elected this option.  As  the  Air  Force
office  of  primary  responsibility  indicates,  the   applicant   had   the
opportunity to complete his service before he requested discharge  since  he
could have continued to participate until 4 May 1989,  his  expiration  term
of service.  Therefore, we are in complete agreement with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility  and  adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting  the  relief
sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied and that the application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

__________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 3 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Jr, Panel Chair
      Ms. Marcia J. Bachman, Member
      Mr. Christopher Carey, Member

      The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket  Number  02-03480
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 May 2002, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 16 Dec 02, w/atchs.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jan 03.





                                   JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN, JR
                                   Panel Chair




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03831

    Original file (BC-2002-03831.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS INDEX CODE 102.06 113.00 135.00 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-03831 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD) be adjusted from 19 Apr 73 to 22 Feb 78 by allowing him to resign his US Air Force Reserve (USAFR) commission on 30 Jun 79 and reappointing him on 4 May 84, thereby...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0003240

    Original file (0003240.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    If this had been a good year, he would have been eligible for the RRL when he was considered for separation [in 90] and his case would have been reviewed as a retirement-in-lieu-of- discharge case. The applicant’s military personnel records, to include documents pertaining to the administrative discharge board and the AF/DRB appeals, are provided at Exhibit B. JACKSON A. HAUSLEIN, JR. Panel Chair AFBCMR 00-03240 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03422

    Original file (BC-2002-03422.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    To establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay a member must complete at least 15 but less than 20 years of satisfactory Federal service, with the last 6 years of qualifying service in a Reserve component. We believe that the applicant's request for a correction of his record in such a manner as to establish his entitlement to receive retired pay at age 60 is supported by the evidence of record. Subsequent to the applicant's medical disqualification and separation from the Air National...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02259

    Original file (BC-2003-02259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states that the applicant was voluntarily assigned to an inactive reserve section from 21 November 2001 until 11 September 2002, when he accepted the IMA position. DPP notes that the fact that the member was assigned to inactive status for a majority of his R/R year, plus the fact that he did not earn 35 points during the time he was in a participating assignment, resulted in him not being credited with a satisfactory year of service. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03286

    Original file (BC-2006-03286.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant completed 29 years, 6 months, and 18 days of honorable federal service; however, only 13 years, 1 month, and 25 days of this time is satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. The DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel indicates the Air Force advisory opinion is based on the information provided in the Department...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01047

    Original file (BC-2004-01047.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    No one told him however, that the six years required were considered qualifying years based on his retirement year ending date of July. In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of an Air Force DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, an Army National Guard (ARNG) NGB Form 22, an ANG NGB Form 22, an honorable discharge order, a memorandum from Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) regarding time necessary to retire with a Reserve retirement, a point...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101791

    Original file (0101791.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 October 2001, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. While we are not certain as to why the applicant did not participate during the period January 1986 to October 1986, we note that had he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in December...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02754

    Original file (BC-2006-02754.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was treated unjustly in determining his discharge date and was placed in the wrong category to receive retired pay, his NGB Form 22, dated 30 May 1994, which separated him from the Washington Air National Guard (ANG), reflects 10 days short of 20 years of service, and that he should be eligible for Reserve retired pay since he is receiving 60% disability compensation and the regulation was changed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01500

    Original file (BC-2002-01500.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    An AF Form 526 (ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary), dated 15 Feb 86, addressed to the applicant, reflects that as of Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 15 December 1985 he had 18 years, 8 months, and 10 days of satisfactory service. They further state that the applicant would need an additional 1 year, 3 months, and 20 days of satisfactory service to gain eligibility for retired pay. After careful review of the limited records and the applicant’s submission, it appears the applicant believed that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202018

    Original file (0202018.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The letter further explained his record showed he had only completed 9 years, 9 months and 9 days of satisfactory service; therefore, he did not meet the requirements for Reserve retired pay at age 60 then or in the future, nor any benefits associated with retired pay. The applicant did not complete 30 years of satisfactory service as required by Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731, therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ...