RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03286
INDEX CODE: 108.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: MR. M. SCOTT BRUMBACK
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 April 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show over 20 good years of service with
eligibility to receive Reserve retired pay and any associated back pay and
benefits.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has attained over 20 years good service; however, he has not received
retirement status or financial compensation.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a statement from his
attorney and copies of numerous military personnel records.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s complete military record cannot be located due to his
records being destroyed in the fire at the National Personnel Records
Center in St. Louis, Missouri; however, some documents verifying service
were reconstructed from other sources. On 24 November 1972, the applicant
was transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve in the grade of Major. An
Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Letter, dated 20 September 1972,
indicated the applicant only had 13 years, 1 month, and 25 days of
satisfactory service as of that date. The letter also indicated the
applicant would not be able to establish eligibility for retired pay at age
60 under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code (USC) 1331, because
he could not accrue a minimum of 20 years satisfactory service prior to his
completion of 28 years commissioned service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPP states even
though ARPC cannot locate the applicant’s complete military personnel
record, there is sufficient documentation available to determine he did not
complete 20 years of satisfactory service. Since he did not complete 20
years of satisfactory service, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay
or any benefits associated with retired pay.
DPP states in order to establish eligibility for Reserve Retired pay under
the provision of Title 10, USC 12731, a member must complete 20 years of
satisfactory federal service, with the last eight years of qualifying
service in a Reserve component. The applicant completed 29 years, 6
months, and 18 days of honorable federal service; however, only 13 years, 1
month, and 25 days of this time is satisfactory service creditable toward
retired pay eligibility. Honorable service is the total years of service
including active, inactive, regular, and Reserve. It includes satisfactory
years, as well as years during which the member does not participate
sufficiently to earn satisfactory years. Prior to 1 July 1949, all federal
service is creditable toward retirement for pay. The applicant was
credited with 6 years, 1 month, and 25 days of satisfactory service for the
period 6 May 1943 to 30 June 1949. Subsequent to 30 June 1949, a member
must earn a minimum of 50 points, in a specific one-year period, to be
credited with a satisfactory year of service. Each Reservist in an active
status is granted 15 membership points, but must earn at least 35 points
through active duty, unit participation or Extension Course Institute
courses to satisfactorily complete a creditable year toward retirement for
pay. The applicant completed an additional 7 years of satisfactory service
between the period 1 July 1949 to 24 November 1972, giving him a total of
13 years, 1 month, and 25 days of satisfactory service creditable toward
retired pay eligibility.
The DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant’s counsel indicates the Air Force advisory opinion is based
on the information provided in the Department of the Air force letter,
dated 24 January 2002, and does include the entirety of the applicant’s
records. Based on a letter received from the Oregon Air National Guard,
dated 23 June 2003, the applicant served an additional 14 years, 11 months,
and 25 days in the Air National Guard. The advisory opinion does not
address the applicant’s Air National Guard Service. The applicant provides
additional military personnel records to include orders, flight records,
and certificates.
A copy of the applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
available records, we found no evidence the individual’s records are in
error. We note the applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory
federal service; therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay
under 10 USC 12731. It seems the applicant may be confused that his
service while in the Oregon Air National Guard is not being included in his
computation of points and satisfactory service provided by the Air Force.
However, the flight records provided by the applicant verify that his
participation for his years in the Air National Guard is, in fact, recorded
as USAFR status participation for the respective years on the ARPC IMT 168,
Computation for Points and Satisfactory Service Credit Summary, provided by
the Air Reserve Personnel Center. To grant the applicant’s request would
be contrary to the governing Air Force regulations and the law. Therefore,
we agree with the opinion and recommendations of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rational as the basis for our
conclusions that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 January 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2006-03286:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Oct 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 16 Nov 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 06.
Exhibit E. Counsel’s Rebuttal, dated 13 Dec 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02511
The applicant’s military record indicates he completed 24 years, 10 months, and 13 days of honorable federal service; however, only 18 years and 1 month of this time is satisfactory service creditable towards Reserve retired pay eligibility. A review of the applicant’s military record indicates that prior to 1 July 1949, he completed 3 years and 1 month of satisfactory service creditable toward retirement, and that he completed 15 years of satisfactory service creditable toward retirement...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02754
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was treated unjustly in determining his discharge date and was placed in the wrong category to receive retired pay, his NGB Form 22, dated 30 May 1994, which separated him from the Washington Air National Guard (ANG), reflects 10 days short of 20 years of service, and that he should be eligible for Reserve retired pay since he is receiving 60% disability compensation and the regulation was changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01289
The applicant’s military records indicates he completed 20 years, 4 months, and 28 days of honorable Federal service as of 30 July 1961, the day before he was transferred to the Honorary Retired Reserve; however, only 10 years, 3 months, and 28 days of this time was satisfactory Federal service creditable towards retired pay eligibility. DPP states the applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service; therefore, he is not eligible for retirement under the provisions of Title 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00032 INDEX CODE: 135.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 JULY 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her mother receive the retirement pay her father did not collect, as well as survivor benefits. Applicant’s father did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service and is not eligible for...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04130
A review of the applicants military record indicates he completed 19 years, 3 months, and 24 days of honorable federal service as of his discharge from the Air Force Reserve; however, only 11 years, 1 month, and 24 days of this time was satisfactory service creditable toward Reserve retired pay eligibility. __________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
The letter further explained his record showed he had only completed 9 years, 9 months and 9 days of satisfactory service; therefore, he did not meet the requirements for Reserve retired pay at age 60 then or in the future, nor any benefits associated with retired pay. The applicant did not complete 30 years of satisfactory service as required by Title 10, U.S.C., Section 12731, therefore, he is not eligible for Reserve retired pay at age 60. ...
A review of the applicant’s record indicates he completed 20 years, and 14 days of Honorable Federal service as of 9 December 1965, the date of his discharge from the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR). However, only 18 years, 7 months, and 5 days of this time is satisfactory Federal service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01194
For her last partial year of Regular active duty, she was correctly credited with 11 months and 21 days of satisfactory service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01047
No one told him however, that the six years required were considered qualifying years based on his retirement year ending date of July. In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of an Air Force DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, an Army National Guard (ARNG) NGB Form 22, an ANG NGB Form 22, an honorable discharge order, a memorandum from Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) regarding time necessary to retire with a Reserve retirement, a point...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01310
His next seven years of service were not considered satisfactory years of service and did not count towards a Reserve retirement. DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Applicant agrees the only issue to resolve is that of whether or not 352 days of satisfactory service constitutes a satisfactory year of service or not. Therefore, since the applicant had...