Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0101791
Original file (0101791.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  01-01791
            INDEX NUMBER:  135.02

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be assigned to the Retired Reserve as of 1 January 1986,  and  that
he be awarded all benefits associated with that action.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was 29 days (or one weekend  drill)  short  of  being  eligible  to
retire for pay from the Reserve.  He states that he was not made aware
that his participation time  with  the  North  Dakota  and  Texas  Air
National Guard would not be counted as  satisfactory  service,  making
him one month short in the final accounting.  He further  states  that
if he had been given proper counseling and  guidance,  he  would  have
been eligible to be transferred to the Retired Reserve.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

ARPC Form 168, Computation for AF  Form  526,  dated  9  August  2001,
reflects that the applicant served on active duty in the  Regular  Air
Force from 15 June 1965 to 1 December 1972.  He was in civilian status
from 2 December 1972 to  15  December  1972.   During  the  period  16
December 1972 to 8 April 1973, he served in the North Dakota/Texas Air
National Guard.  From 9 April 1973 until 22 September 1976, he  served
on active duty in the Regular Air  Force.   He  returned  to  the  Air
National Guard on 23 September 1976 until his discharge on 27  October
1986.  The applicant completed a total of 19 years, 11 months,  and  1
day of satisfactory Federal service.

An ANG/USAFR Point Credit Summary containing computerized  information
on the applicant’s participation was provided to him for review on  27
October 1986.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ ARPC/DPP recommended denial.  They state  that  in  order  for  the
period from 16 December 1972  to  8  April  1973  to  be  credited  as
satisfactory service the applicant must have earned at least 16 points
during this period.  They indicate that it appears that the  applicant
stopped participating in December 1985 although he was not  discharged
until 27 October 1986.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 5 October 2001, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice. After a  careful  review  of
the   evidence   of   record,   we   note   that,   except   for   the
retirement/retention period in  question,  the  applicant  had  earned
sufficient points to be credited with over 19  satisfactory  years  of
Federal service.  While we are not certain as to why the applicant did
not participate during the period January 1986  to  October  1986,  we
note that had he requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in
December 1985, he would have been eligible for retired pay at age  60.
Therefore, we believe that the applicant was  not  properly  counseled
concerning this issue.  In view of the above, we  recommend  that  his
record be corrected to the extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:

      a.  He was discharged from the Air National Guard on 16 December
1985, rather than 27 October 1986, and on 17  December  1985,  he  was
transferred to the Headquarters Air Reserve Personnel Center.


      b.  On 18 December 1985,  he  was  transferred  to  the  Retired
Reserve, in the Reserve grade of Technical Sergeant, with  entitlement
to retired pay at age 60.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 19 December 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                 Mr. Terry A. Yonkers, Panel Chair
                 Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
                 Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 June 2001.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 28 September 2001.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 October 2001.




                                   TERRY A. YONKERS
                                   Panel Chair



AFBCMR 01-01791




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that:

            a.  He was discharged  from  the  Air  National  Guard  on
16 December 1985, rather than 27 October  1986,  and  on  17  December
1985, he was transferred to the  Headquarters  Air  Reserve  Personnel
Center.


            b.  On 18 December 1985, he was transferred to the Retired
Reserve, in the Reserve grade of Technical Sergeant, with  entitlement
to retired pay at age 60.





            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01432

    Original file (BC-2005-01432.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01432 INDEX CODE: 135.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show satisfactory years of service for retention/retirement (R/R) year’s 17 April 1982 to 16 April 1983, 17 April 1984 to 16 April 1985, 17 April 1986 to 16 April 1987, and 17 April 1987 to 16 April...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002844

    Original file (0002844.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant stated that he had applied for reassignment in November 1998, he could have participated with his unit of assignment until his effective date of transfer on 26 February 1999. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded 4 non- paid inactive duty training (IDT) points for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02731

    Original file (BC-2005-02731.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement and copies of his Oath of Office, Reserve orders; Air Reserve Personnel Center notification letters of change in his R/R dates, and his ANG/USAFR point credit summaries. DPP states the applicant’s service history shows he participated for a partial year of service while on extended active duty as a Reserve of the Air Force from 17 May 1983 through 7 May 1984. The Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002767

    Original file (0002767.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02767 INDEX CODE: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated in the grade of lieutenant colonel (0-5) as a retired member of the Air Force Reserve with full eligibility for retirement benefits in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Applicant’s complete submission is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200756

    Original file (0200756.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    INDEX CODE: 135.02 AFBCMR 02-00756 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: APPLICANT Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03905

    Original file (BC-2004-03905.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, DPP contends, there is no provision of law that would allow a member to retire with entitlements and no pay. DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that while he is no authority on retirement matters, he does believe that retirement after 15 years of service is allowable at times. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03286

    Original file (BC-2006-03286.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant completed 29 years, 6 months, and 18 days of honorable federal service; however, only 13 years, 1 month, and 25 days of this time is satisfactory service creditable toward retired pay eligibility. The DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel indicates the Air Force advisory opinion is based on the information provided in the Department...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0103522

    Original file (0103522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission is at Exhibit A. Based on the evidence of record and that verified by HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC), the applicant was properly credited for all of the service which he performed during his career, including the credit of 304 points (which equates to 10 months) of active duty he received for Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 3 August 1962. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01899

    Original file (BC-2005-01899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states, in order for him to receive retired pay in the grade of master sergeant, he must have been promoted to the grade of master sergeant and have served satisfactorily in that grade. It appears evidence provided by the applicant to the contrary can be attributed to an honorary promotion to master sergeant conferred upon the applicant by the State of Pennsylvania and was not a federally recognized promotion. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02259

    Original file (BC-2003-02259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP states that the applicant was voluntarily assigned to an inactive reserve section from 21 November 2001 until 11 September 2002, when he accepted the IMA position. DPP notes that the fact that the member was assigned to inactive status for a majority of his R/R year, plus the fact that he did not earn 35 points during the time he was in a participating assignment, resulted in him not being credited with a satisfactory year of service. We took notice of the applicant's complete...