Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007886
Original file (20090007886.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 October 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090007886 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

2.  The applicant states he served in the U.S. Army from February 1961 to February 1964 as a military policeman, he was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone with the 534th Military Police Company during the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis, and his unit was alerted for possible deployment if war broke out.  He adds that he served in Vietnam as a member of the U.S. Air Force and is 100-percent disabled due to military combat duty.  The applicant believes he deserves to be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 8 February 1961.  Upon completion of training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 951.10 (Military Policeman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) he was assigned to the 534th Military Police Company (Service), Fort Clayton, Canal Zone, from 9 July 1961 through 22 February 1963.  However, section 9 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) does not show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 7 February 1964 based on the expiration of his term of service and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement).  At the time he had completed 3 years of net active service.

   a.  Item 24 (Statement of Service), block c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he completed 1 year, 5 months, and 22 days of overseas service in Panama.

   b.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol and Carbine Bars.

5.  The applicant's military personnel records do not show any evidence that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for service in support of the Cuban Missile Crisis.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  Qualifying service for this award includes service in support of U.S. military operations in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963.

7.  Section II (Terms) of the glossary in Army Regulation 600-8-22 defines the following terms:

	a.  "Area of operation" is the foreign territory upon which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the direct support of the designated military operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of operations; and the airspace above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.

	b.  "Direct support" is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility by ground units, ships, and aircraft provided it involves actually entering the designated area of eligibility.  This includes units, ships, and aircraft providing logistic, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility.

	c.  "Area of eligibility" is defined as the foreign territory on which troops have actually landed or are present and specifically deployed for the operation; adjacent water areas in which ships are operating, patrolling, or providing direct support of the operation; and the air space above and adjacent to the area in which operations are being conducted.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service while assigned to the 534th Military Police Company (Service) during the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis because his unit was alerted for possible deployment if war broke out.

2.  The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Army from 8 February 1961 to 7 February 1964 and he was assigned to the 534th Military Police Company (Service), Fort Clayton, Canal Zone, from 9 July 1961 through 22 February 1963.

3.  The evidence of record shows that the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for members of the Armed Forces of the United States participating in direct support of U.S. military operations in Cuba for a period of 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963.

4.  The applicant's claim that his unit in the Canal Zone was on alert during the Cuban Missile Crisis is not disputed.  However, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he was assigned or attached to a unit, or an element of a unit, in the area of operations in direct support of military operations in Cuba during the period of his service in the Canal Zone from 24 October 1962 to 22 February 1963 or at any time thereafter through 1 June 1963.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.
5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ____X___  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007886



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090007886



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2011-016

    Original file (2011-016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 23, 2011, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who was honorably discharged from the Coast Guard in 1966, asked the Board to correct his discharge form DD 214 to show that he received a medal for participating in the Cuban Missile Crisis1 and to have the Coast Guard issue a DD 215 showing all of the medals and citations he received. All of the medals that a Coast Guard member could receive for serving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021485

    Original file (20130021485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no substantiating evidence that the applicant served in direct support or within the area of eligibility for which the AFEM was authorized for operations in the Cuban Missile Crisis. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the NDSM to the awards already listed on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001350

    Original file (20110001350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 July 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110001350 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) for the period 26 May 1961 through 24 January 1964 shows he served in Korea from 12 July 1961 through 11 September 1962 in section 5 (Service Outside the Continental United States).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010608C080213

    Original file (20070010608C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides orders, dated 6 March 1962, assigning him to Fort Benning, GA; his DD Form 214; a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 8 April 1965; his Honorable Discharge Certificate; a letter, dated 5 July 2001, from the Review Boards Agency Support Division; two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record under the Provisions of Title 10, U. S. Code, Section 1552), both dated 5 April 2001; an Army Precommission Extension Course diploma; three subcourse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000809

    Original file (20100000809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. While an AFEM was awarded for service in Cuba from 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963, the applicant had already been REFRAD in August 1962 and thus could not qualify for that award. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009583C070206

    Original file (20050009583C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) is a military award of the United States military which was first created in 1961 by Executive Order of President John Kennedy. The first campaign of the AFEM was the Cuban Missile Crisis and the award was issued to those who served in the designated area of operation during the period of 24 October 1962 to 1 June 1963. However, the criteria for award of the AFEM required that individuals must serve in the designated area of operations in order...

  • CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-037

    Original file (2008-037.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The list of Coast Guard vessels that served in that area during that period does not include the Rockaway. APPLICABLE LAWS Commandant Instruction M1650.25D, the Coast Guard’s Medals and Awards Manual, contains the rules governing the eligibility of Coast Guard members for various awards and med- als. of the manual provides the eligibility requirements for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), as follows: The AFEM may be awarded to personnel of the Armed Forces of the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015901C080407

    Original file (20070015901C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland C. Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the period of the applicant's honorable active duty service entitles him to the NDSM, and that his service in Korea between 1962 and 1963 entitles him to the KDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his 26 June 1963 DD Form 214 by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010705

    Original file (20080010705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested that he be awarded the AFEM, but item 24c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 does not show that he served overseas at any time during his active duty service. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence that he ever served in the designated area of operations of the Cuban Missile Crisis. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006349

    Original file (20090006349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the AFEM for Cuba. While the applicant asserts he is entitled to award of the AFEM for Cuba, the applicant’s record shows he served in Germany from 18 January 1962 to 20 November 1963 which would have been the period for authorization for award of the AFEM. There is no evidence, nor has he provided any evidence that shows he served in Cuba or in direct support of any operation related to Cuba.