Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03463
Original file (BC-2002-03463.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-03463
            INDEX CODE:  128.05

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO



_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment date be changed from 17 Dec 01 to 17 Jan 02.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not due to reenlist until 16 Feb 02; however, he reenlisted  on
17 Dec 01 while deployed to Diego Garcia.   The  following  month  the
Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) list was released and activated the
week of 17 Jan 02.

In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his AF Form
901, Reenlistment Eligibility Annex to DD  Form  4.   The  applicant’s
complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service Date (TAFMSD) is
17 Aug 92.  He has been progressively promoted to the grade  of  staff
sergeant (E-5), with an effective date and date of rank of 1  Dec  99.
The applicant is assigned to the supply career field, with  a  Control
Air  Force  Specialty  Code  (CAFSC)  of  2S051.   His   most   recent
reenlistment was on 17 Dec 01 for a period of 4 years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the  application  be  denied.   DPPAE  stated
that, on 17 Jan 02, HQ USAF  released  a  new  Selective  Reenlistment
Bonus (SRB) list.  The window to get the SRB  recomputed  was  if  the
member reenlisted between 2 Jan 02 and 16 Jan 02.  The SRB review  had
not been announced as of the date the  applicant  reenlisted  (17  Dec
01); therefore, the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) was  not  able  to
brief the applicant it had changed.  The HQ AFPC/DPPAE  evaluation  is
at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  applicant  on  6
December 2002 for review and response.  As of this date,  no  response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case.
However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed  as
the basis for our decision that the applicant has  failed  to  sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or an  injustice.   In
view of the above and absent evidence by  the  applicant  which  would
lead  us  to  believe  he  was  provided  inaccurate   or   misleading
information at the time he  executed  his  reenlistment,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 30 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                  Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Panel Chair
                  Ms. Martha Maust, Member
                  Mr. John E. Pettit, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in  connection  with
AFBCMR Docket Number 02-03463.

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 Oct 02, w/atch.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 25 Nov 02.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 02.




                                   EDWARD C. KOENIG III
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201315

    Original file (0201315.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01315 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of reenlistment be changed from 11 December 2001 to 29 January 2002 to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The applicant reenlisted on 11 December 2001 before the SRB review had been announced...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02994

    Original file (BC-2002-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02994

    Original file (BC-2002-02994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She reenlisted on 18 December 2001 in zone A for a 1.5 multiple SRB. The SRB review had not been announced as of the date the applicant reenlisted and therefore the MPF was not able to brief the applicant it had changed. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR Docket No.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04106

    Original file (BC-2002-04106.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR 02-04106 Index Code: 128.05 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628

    Original file (BC-2002-00628.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202427

    Original file (0202427.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02427 INDEX CODE 128.05 112.07 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her nine-month extension executed on 11 Jan 02 be voided (per Exhibit E) and she be allowed to reenlist for six years so she may qualify for a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). HQ AFPC/DPPAER informally advised the AFBCMR Staff...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200680

    Original file (0200680.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00680 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment date of 1 Jan 02 be changed to 2 Jan 02 in order to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) entitlement. The HQ AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00623

    Original file (BC-2003-00623.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has never received an SRB even though he has reenlisted two times, extended once, and served for nearly 10 years. A “Zone B” SRB is a bonus for members having over six but less than 10 years of total active federal military service and whose AFSC has been authorized to receive a bonus. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0201986

    Original file (0201986.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    EDWARD C. KOENIG III Panel Chair Attachment: Ltrs, AFPC/DPPAE, dtd 15 Jul 02, w/atch AFBCMR 02-01986 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03679

    Original file (BC-2002-03679.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We note that, since the applicant was not in a required 5-skill level...