RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01981
INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The circumstances surrounding her discharge were corrupt. She
contends that circumstances surrounding an improper relationship with
a Marine Corp NCO who was an instructor at the Explosive Ordinance
School, which she was a student, caused the symptoms of adjustment
disorder and her discharge from the Air Force.
In support of her request, applicant provided a copy of her DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty and a
personal statement. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 March 2001 for a
term of 4 years.
The applicant was first seen in the clinic on 26 July 2001 reporting
that she was unhappy with military life, and had decreased mood.
Additional circumstances reported included that she had just broken up
with her fiancé, and was far from family and frustrated that she
hasn't seen them. She reported a history of an eating disorder (was
treated by her family physician in Tennessee with medication). She
reported that she had had symptoms for 4 months (i.e. approximately
since the end of the March 2001, during basic military training)
including depressed mood, decreased sleep, decreased appetite,
anxiety, spontaneous crying, and loss of interest in pleasurable
activities. The physician felt she was depressed, started her on an
antidepressant medication and referred her to the mental health
clinic.
She was seen in the mental health clinic on 3 August 2001, where she
reported breaking up with her boyfriend. The mental health clinic
entry documents a prior history of depression as well as eating
disorder prior to entering service. "Client does report history of
dysthymia and major depression and agrees to follow with signing a
release for records from her previous physician who treated her for
depression." Her diagnosis was felt to be Major Depression,
recurrent. On the 27 August 2001 mental health clinic entry, a four
(4) year history of depression treated with multiple medications, and
two (2) suicide attempts were recorded. In addition, some history of
a turbulent childhood was indicated and it was felt that she did not
meet diagnostic criteria for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at that
time.
A memorandum from her psychiatrist dated 29 August 2001 recommended
administrative separation for Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood,
and Eating Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified. A diagnosis of a
personality disorder was not definitively made nor excluded (Axis II:
deferred").
On 7 September 2001 she was notified of her commanders intent to
recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the
provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.1.11.1. The
reason for this action was that she was diagnosed with a mental
disorder. She was advised of her rights in this matter and
acknowledged receipt of the notification on that same date. After
consulting counsel she elected to waive her right to submit matters on
her own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the wing attorney
advisor found the case legally sufficient and recommended that she be
discharged without probation and rehabilitation. The discharge
authority concurred with the recommendation and directed that she be
discharged with an entry-level separation. She served 6 months and 18
days on active duty and was issued an RE code of “2C.”
_____________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant’s request and
recommends denial. The Medical Consultant states that the applicant
developed symptoms of depression due to an adjustment disorder and was
administratively separated for that unsuiting condition. The time of
onset of her symptoms reported in her initial clinic visit indicates
that these symptoms began approximately 2 months prior to the start of
the improper relationship she reports in her letter. During her
mental health evaluations, a history of existing prior to service
depression, suicide attempts and an eating disorder were revealed. It
is very likely that had she revealed that history during her
enlistment medical evaluation, she would have been rejected for
enlistment. The circumstances she alleges in her letter requesting
correction would certainly aggravate her symptoms. The Medical
Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. Based
on the review of his case file, her RE code 2C, “Involuntarily
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation
without characterization of service” is correct. The DPPAE evaluation
is at Exhibit D.
AFPC/DPPRS reviewed applicant’s request and recommends denial. The
applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Additionally,
she provided no facts warranting a change in his discharge. The DPPRS
evaluation is at attachment E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
15 Nov 02, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice to warrant changing her
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. Evidence has not been provided in
support of her appeal, which would lead us to believe that a change to
her RE code is warranted. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the BCMR Medical Consultant and the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2002-
01981 in Executive Session on 9 April 2003, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Billy C. Baxter, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 June 2002 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 19 Aug 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 12 Nov 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Sep 02.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Nov 02.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00868
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00868 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to enable reenlistment into the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01129
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01129 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed to allow her to reenlist. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE states, in part, that the RE Code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02947
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02947 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard. She served 3 months and 8 days on active duty and was issued an RE code of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02937
Available Department of Veterans Administration (DVA) medical documentation shows that in 1999 she still reported symptoms of the conditions for which she was disability discharged. The documentation provided is insufficient to show that the applicant is now fit for active duty. Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the BCMR Medical Consultant and the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00643
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00643 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service, be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03206 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The applicant developed symptoms of grief depressed mood while in technical training that was diagnosed as Adjustment Disorder with...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03206 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. The applicant developed symptoms of grief depressed mood while in technical training that was diagnosed as Adjustment Disorder with...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00064
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00064 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 JUL 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed from 12 September 2002 to 19 September 2002. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The records...
The evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommended denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01742
A follow-up evaluation on 19 September 1996 rendered a diagnosis of major depression vs. dysthymia and she was treated with the antidepressant medicine Prozac. The applicant’s history of recurrent major depression requiring hospitalization was clearly disqualifying for continued active duty. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error...