RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00492
INDEX CODE: 128.10
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
A correction be made to the Government Bill of Lading (GBL) AP-127101
to reflect the shipment contained professional gear.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
On 11 December 2000 Global Van Lines made an extra pick-up at his
office located in the Aerospace Corp complex in Los Angeles, CA. At
that time his professional gear, including but not limited to,
professional books, papers, desk chair, government pictures, office
mementos, and AF-issued computer equipment was packed and shipped to
Rosslyn, VA. Captain E--- was present for the outbound portion of the
move, Mr. B--- was present for the incoming shipment. Because of an
unexpected meeting with the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force, he
was unable to be present and there was a failure to properly annotate
the GBL indicating it contained professional books, papers, and
equipment (PBP&E).
In support of the appeal, applicant submits statements from Captain E--
- and Mr. B---, also a letter from Joint Personal Property Shipping
Office (JPPSO) indicating that the Global Van Line representative
believes PBP&E was shipped.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the
grade of brigadier general.
The applicant was billed $2,240.00 for exceeding the prescribed weight
allowance of 18,000 pounds. A verbal rebuttal of the excess cost
charged was filed stating the applicant had not received credit for
his professional books, papers and equipment. The Excess Cost
Adjudication Function (ECAF) reviewed the case and advised the
applicant that regulations require PBP&E be separately packed, clearly
marked as professional items, and identified as such on the
appropriate shipping documents at the time of pick-up of the property.
Since no professional gear is identified on the shipping records,
based on provisions of applicable regulations, they concluded that no
credit for PBP&E could be granted.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
JPPSO/CC states that when the applicant made application to ship his
household goods (HHGs) he estimated he would have 3,000 pounds of
PBP&E to include in the shipment. However, no items were separately
packed, marked, or identified on the shipping documents as
professional goods. Since an extra pickup of items was made from the
office, they believe these items were PBP&E items. Because the
applicant was called away during the packing of his HHG, they think
this may have contributed to the oversight in the PBP&E not being
properly identified on the appropriate shipping documents. For these
reasons, they support the applicant’s request to receive credit for
PBP&E in his move from California to Virginia. Therefore, based on
information obtained from the sequent shipment, they recommend the
applicant be granted 1,276 pounds of PBP&E.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
JPPSO/CC states that after further review of the shipment file from a
previous shipment, they have determined the applicant should be
credited with an additional 180 pounds of PBP&E. He asks that
paragraph 6 of subject advisory to read, the shipment that moved under
Government Bill of Lading AP-127101, dated 9 November 2000,
contained 1,456 pounds of PBP&E, vice 1,276 pounds.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that he
appreciates the relief recommended by the JPPSO and its apparent
understanding that, but for an unexpected meeting with an Assistant
Secretary of the Air Force, he would have been present for the packing
of his PBP&E at his office and would have ensured that it was properly
annotated.
While the advisory references the pick-up from his office, it does not
take into account the PBP&E that were at his home and were packed and
shipped also. These items included:
a. 5 cartons of professional books
b. 2 medium sized boxes of professional memorabilia
c. 5 picture cartons of memorabilia
d. 1 wardrobe box of specialty Air Force uniforms
e. 2 medium sized boxes containing a government issued computer,
printer, docking station and associated parts.
He estimates the total weight of the above additional listed items
from his home to be approximately 1000 pounds.
Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief. In this
respect, we note the supporting statement from the individual who
supervised and assisted the moving company in the packaging of
applicant’s professional gear from his office. In view of this
statement and noting the comments from the Air Force, we are persuaded
that the applicant should be giving credit for shipment of 1,456
pounds of PBP&E. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below. Applicant’s request for shipment of
additional PBP&E, located at his home, is noted; however, we find no
evidence that the applicant separately packed, marked, and provided a
description of the items to the carrier. The applicant, a senior Air
Force officer, should have been aware of these requirements. Based on
the evidence of record, we do not recommend allowance for any
additional shipment of PBP&E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the household goods
shipment under Government Bill of Lading AP-127101, dated 9 November
2000, contained 1,456 pounds of professional books, papers, and
equipment (PBP&E).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 11 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Panel Chair
Ms. Diane Arnold, Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, JPPSO/CC, dated 25 Feb 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, JPPSO/CC, dated 7 May 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 02.
Exhibit F. Applicant's Response, dated 24 May 02.
LAWRENCE R. LEEHY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-00492
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that the household goods
shipment under Government Bill of Lading AP-127101, dated 9 November
2000, contained 1,456 pounds of professional books, papers, and
equipment (PBP&E).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01823 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The excess unaccompanied baggage (UB) costs for shipment of his household goods (HHG) be corrected to eliminate costs of professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&E) and the remaining excess costs...
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Applicant filed a rebuttal to her indebtedness claiming she did not get credit for all of her PBP&E, a mattress was missing, items were misidentified on the inventory, and questioning the validity of the shipment weight. The Excess Cost Adjudication Function (ECAF) reviewed her rebuttal and credited her with 363...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00425
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes the record to be unjust because he was unable to insure the movers on the day of the shipment correctly annotated PBP&E on the appropriate shipping documents. It is also unreasonable to believe that a colonel with 24 years of service at the time of PCS and 11 prior PCS moves would not have any PBP&E to ship. LAURENCE M. GRONER Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00425 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02023
Since the letter was provided more than six months following the delivery of the shipment, ECAF contacted the carrier, only to discover that the carrier representative who signed the statement was not familiar with the shipment and that she, at the applicant’s request, identified items of PBP&E on the inventory per his request. In this case, reviews of the inventories reveal there were no items identified as PBP&E during the move. Following receipt of ECAF’s 14 May 2004 letter, he...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01319 INDEX CODE: 128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a remission of indebtedness of the excess weight of household goods (HHG) shipment. At no time did anyone from TMO explain to his wife that the maximum weight for the household goods was 9,000 pounds. As of this date, no...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02860
The shipment had a net weight of 19,220 pounds. Regulations require that PBP&E be separately packed, marked, and identified as such on the shipping documents in order to receive credit. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02029
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). He states that at the time of shipment he estimated he had 10 pounds of PBP&E. Should the board decide to grant the relief sought, the records may be changed to state the household goods shipment that moved under Government Bill of Lading VP-486,927 dated 9 Nov 95, contained 975 pounds of professional books, papers, and equipment.
Therefore, at the time of his PCS the member’s weight allowance for the shipping of HHGs was 4,225 pounds, plus 1,100 pounds of UB. There has been no evidence submitted to show that he informed the destination site that his shipment exceeded the weight allowed for the shipping of his HHGs, nor did he request to have his shipment reweighed. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...