Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800542
Original file (9800542.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

SEP  1 6  1998 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NO:  98-00542 
. >. 
COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

Applicant  requests that the total weight of his household goods 
shipped at the time of his Permanent Change of Station  (PCS) be 
adjusted. 
Specifically,  his  estimate  of  10  pounds  for 
professional  books,  papers,  and  equipment  (PBP&E)  should  be 
changed to 975 pounds.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. 
The  appropriate Air  Force  office  evaluated  applicant's request 
and provided  an advisory opinion to the Board  recommending the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C).  The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available evidence  of  record, we  find  insufficient evidence  of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  rebutted  by  applicant. 
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which 
entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not  followed,  or 
appropriate  standards  were  not  applied,  we  find  no  basis  to 
disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

Members  of  the  Board  Mrs.  Barbara A. Westgate, Mr.  Henry  Romo 
Jr.,  and  Mr.  Allen  Beckett  considered  this  application  on 
15 September 1998 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force 
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. 

Panel Chafr 

Exhibits: 
A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 

JOINT PERSONAL PROPERTY SHIPPING OFFICE - SAN ANTONIO (DOD) 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

613 NORTHWEST LOOP 410, SUITE 400 

SAN  ANTONIO  TX 

782164518 

MEMORANDUM FOR 

AFBCMR 
1535 COMMAAND DRIVE 
EE WING 3RD FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB MD 20762-7002 

FROM:  DIR 

1  I  MAY  1998 

SUBJECT:  Application for Correction of Military Records- 

 

-

,

1.  This Air Staff Advisory is submitted in reference to subject application 

2.  Background: 

a.  The Air Force is governed in matters pertaining to the shipment of 
household goods (HHG) for its military members by Volume I, Joint Federal 
Travel Regulations (JFTR), which is promulgated from Title 37, U. S. Code. 

& 

b.  Per SDecial Order AB-0111 dated 8 Nov 95. the armlicant made a perma- 
VA for the pur- 
separation, he 
 to his home 

nent change of station (PCS) from 
pose of separation from active du 
was entitled to 
of record (HOR), 

nts f

r

a

L -  

c.  The applicant made two shipments of personal property in conjunction 

A shipment of HHG moved from Italy to Rock Island IL 

with his separation. 
under Government Bill of Lading (GBL) VP-486,927.  It had a net weight of 
3,722 poun 
moved from 
653 pounds 
eding 
The Excess Cost Adjudication Function (ECAF) was asked to review the case 
he member had filed a Congressional Inquiry regarding his shipment.  ECAF 

shipment of unaccompanied baggage  (UB)  also 
IL under GBL YP-889,465 with a net weight of 

He was billed a total 
llowance of 2,000 pounds 

determined that the excess cost charges were correct as the member had 
exceeded both his JFTR weight allowance and the unaccompanied baggage weight 
entitlement 
The excess charges are higher than those com- 
puted at origin because the origin charges did not include storage and other 
destination charges. 

3.  The applicant is requesting an allowance for professional books, papers, 
and equipment (PBP&E).  He states that because he was rushed out of the mili- 
tary, he did not fully understand or read all of the paperwork regarding his 
shipment.  He states that at the time of shipment he estimated he had 10 
pounds of PBP&E.  However, he now estimates the shipment contained 975 pounds 
of PBP&E. 

t 
r 

4.  Paragraph U5310-C, JFTR, provides that a member is entitled to transporta- 
tion of PBP&E when certified by the member as being necessary in the perform- 
ance of official duties and when prepared for transportation in accordance 
with regulations of the Service concerned.  Paragraph 2.3.5.2, Air Force 
Sup/JFTR, stipulates that in order for a member to receive credit for PBP&E, 
it must be separately packed, marked, weighed, and a clear description of 
articles entered on the carrier's household goods inventory prepared at time 
It also states that after-the-fact declaration of PBP&E will only 
of pickup. 
be accepted when a review of the member's case file contains documented indis- 
putable intent to declare PBP&E.  Documented intent includes the requirement 
that the PBP&E was separately identified, marked, and inventoried during the 
move in question. 

5.  Review of the applicant's case file indicates that no items in the ship- 
ment were separately packed, marked, weighed, or listed on the carrier's HHG 
inventory as PBP&E. 
GBL VP-486,927 indicates that no PBP&E was included in 
the shipment 
HHG's inventory that he states could have been shipped as PB 
include books, book cases, word processor, and encyclopedias 
Under normal circumstances, some of these items would not qualify as PBP&E and 
none of the items were identified as PBP&E as required by regulations in order 
to receive credit. 

The applicant has circled 10 items on the 

6.  In view of the above, recommend denial of the member's request to receive 
a 975 pound credit for PBP&E. 
He did not provide any information to support a 
probable error or injustice. 

7.  Should the board decide to grant the relief sought, the records may be 
changed to state the household goods shipment that moved under Government Bill 
of Lading VP-486,927 dated 9 Nov 95, contained 975 pounds of professional 
books, papers, and equipment. 

8.  My point of contact is Mr. Alfred P. August.  If there are any questions 
regarding this matter, he may be reached at DSN 954-4227. 

GEORGE R. FITZPATRICK 
Director 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01823

    Original file (BC-2003-01823.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01823 INDEX CODE: 128.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The excess unaccompanied baggage (UB) costs for shipment of his household goods (HHG) be corrected to eliminate costs of professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&E) and the remaining excess costs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01577

    Original file (BC-2010-01577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The HHG shipment of his PBP&E was not annotated properly on his Descriptive Inventories Sheet, dated 6 Jun 07. JPPA-ECAF’s adjudication section reviewed the case file and determined the debt was correct, advising that previous or subsequent shipment weights could not be used in determining the excess cost for the shipment in question. The applicant is requesting the 22 items in his HHG...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1996-02029

    Original file (BC-1996-02029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9602029

    Original file (9602029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Director, Joint Personal Property Shipping Office, JPPSO-SAT/DIR, reviewed this application and recommended denial. ECAF again reviewed the case and based on claim documentation, they granted a weight credit of 493 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items under GBL VP-154,889 and 108 pounds for items...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002777

    Original file (0002777.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, at the time of his PCS the member’s weight allowance for the shipping of HHGs was 4,225 pounds, plus 1,100 pounds of UB. There has been no evidence submitted to show that he informed the destination site that his shipment exceeded the weight allowed for the shipping of his HHGs, nor did he request to have his shipment reweighed. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02023

    Original file (BC-2004-02023.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the letter was provided more than six months following the delivery of the shipment, ECAF contacted the carrier, only to discover that the carrier representative who signed the statement was not familiar with the shipment and that she, at the applicant’s request, identified items of PBP&E on the inventory per his request. In this case, reviews of the inventories reveal there were no items identified as PBP&E during the move. Following receipt of ECAF’s 14 May 2004 letter, he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00425

    Original file (BC-2005-00425.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes the record to be unjust because he was unable to insure the movers on the day of the shipment correctly annotated PBP&E on the appropriate shipping documents. It is also unreasonable to believe that a colonel with 24 years of service at the time of PCS and 11 prior PCS moves would not have any PBP&E to ship. LAURENCE M. GRONER Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00425 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002124

    Original file (0002124.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Applicant filed a rebuttal to her indebtedness claiming she did not get credit for all of her PBP&E, a mattress was missing, items were misidentified on the inventory, and questioning the validity of the shipment weight. The Excess Cost Adjudication Function (ECAF) reviewed her rebuttal and credited her with 363...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 0000902

    Original file (0000902.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Using the cube rule, ECAF increased the weight for professional books, papers, and equipment (PBP&G), from 50 pounds to 960 pounds for the unaccompanied baggage (UB) shipment and credited 457 pounds for missing and irreparably damaged items for the household goods (HHG) shipment that moved from Germany to England. JPPSO/CC indicates the applicant submitted an amendment to his original application in which he states he made another PCS move from England back to Germany and he was not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03906

    Original file (BC-2003-03906.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a member declares PBP&E and the carrier fails to record and weigh the items, credit may be given if the traffic management office (TMO) documents the items and weight upon delivery. Review of the applicant’s HHG inventory and other shipping documents reveal that no items were identified as PBP&E during the shipment in question. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...